> -Original Message-
> From: kvm-ppc-ow...@vger.kernel.org
> [mailto:kvm-ppc-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Hollis Blanchard
> Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 7:49 AM
> To: Liu Yu-B13201
> Cc: kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] Add kvmppc_mmu_dtlb/itlb_miss for booke
>
> On Thu, 2008-12-18 at 20:22 +0800, Liu Yu wrote:
> > When itlb or dtlb miss happens, E500 needs to update some
> mmu registers.
> > So that the auto-load mechanism can work on E500 when write
> a tlb entry.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Liu Yu
> > ---
> > arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h |2 ++
> > arch/powerpc/kvm/44x_tlb.c |8
> > arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c |2 ++
> > 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h
> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h
> > index f4b041b..82547c8 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h
> > @@ -63,6 +63,8 @@ extern int kvmppc_mmu_dtlb_index(struct
> kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t eaddr);
> > extern int kvmppc_mmu_itlb_index(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> gva_t eaddr);
> > extern gpa_t kvmppc_mmu_xlate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> unsigned int gtlb_index,
> >gva_t eaddr);
> > +extern void kvmppc_mmu_dtlb_miss(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> > +extern void kvmppc_mmu_itlb_miss(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> >
> > extern struct kvm_vcpu *kvmppc_core_vcpu_create(struct kvm *kvm,
> > unsigned int id);
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/44x_tlb.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/44x_tlb.c
> > index e67b731..4a16f47 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/44x_tlb.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/44x_tlb.c
> > @@ -232,6 +232,14 @@ int kvmppc_mmu_dtlb_index(struct
> kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t eaddr)
> > return kvmppc_44x_tlb_index(vcpu, eaddr, vcpu->arch.pid, as);
> > }
> >
> > +void kvmppc_mmu_itlb_miss(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > +{
> > +}
> > +
> > +void kvmppc_mmu_dtlb_miss(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > +{
> > +}
> > +
> > static void kvmppc_44x_shadow_release(struct
> kvmppc_vcpu_44x *vcpu_44x,
> >unsigned int stlb_index)
> > {
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c
> > index a73b395..933c406 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c
> > @@ -295,6 +295,7 @@ int kvmppc_handle_exit(struct kvm_run
> *run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > kvmppc_booke_queue_irqprio(vcpu,
> BOOKE_IRQPRIO_DTLB_MISS);
> > vcpu->arch.dear = vcpu->arch.fault_dear;
> > vcpu->arch.esr = vcpu->arch.fault_esr;
> > + kvmppc_mmu_dtlb_miss(vcpu);
> > kvmppc_account_exit(vcpu, DTLB_REAL_MISS_EXITS);
> > r = RESUME_GUEST;
> > break;
> > @@ -337,6 +338,7 @@ int kvmppc_handle_exit(struct kvm_run
> *run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > if (gtlb_index < 0) {
> > /* The guest didn't have a mapping for it. */
> > kvmppc_booke_queue_irqprio(vcpu,
> BOOKE_IRQPRIO_ITLB_MISS);
> > + kvmppc_mmu_itlb_miss(vcpu);
> > kvmppc_account_exit(vcpu, ITLB_REAL_MISS_EXITS);
> > break;
> > }
>
> I don't think you've supplied an implementation of these
> hooks for e500.
> Does it build with this patch series applied?
>
Sorry, these hooks for e500 exists in "[PATCH 06/10] E500 TLB
emulation".
--
+static inline void kvmppc_e500_deliver_tlb_miss(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+ unsigned int eaddr, int as)
+{
+ struct kvmppc_vcpu_e500 *vcpu_e500 = to_e500(vcpu);
+ unsigned int victim, pidsel, tsized;
+ int tlbsel;
+
+ /* since we only have two TLBs, only lower bit is used. */
+ tlbsel = (vcpu_e500->mas4 >> 28) & 0x1;
+ victim = (tlbsel == 0) ? tlb0_get_next_victim(vcpu_e500) : 0;
+ pidsel = (vcpu_e500->mas4 >> 16) & 0xf;
+ tsized = (vcpu_e500->mas4 >> 8) & 0xf;
+
+ vcpu_e500->mas0 = MAS0_TLBSEL(tlbsel) | MAS0_ESEL(victim)
+ | MAS0_NV(vcpu_e500->guest_tlb_nv[tlbsel]);
+ vcpu_e500->mas1 = MAS1_VALID | (as ? MAS1_TS : 0)
+ | MAS1_TID(vcpu_e500->pid[pidsel])
+ | MAS1_TSIZE(tsized);
+ vcpu_e500->mas2 = (eaddr & MAS2_EPN)
+ | (vcpu_e50
