Re: [PATCH] arm64: paravirt: remove conduit check in has_pv_steal_clock

2022-11-09 Thread Will Deacon
On Fri, 4 Nov 2022 06:16:59 +, Usama Arif wrote:
> arm_smccc_1_1_invoke() which is called later on in the function
> will return failure if there's no conduit (or pre-SMCCC 1.1),
> hence the check is unnecessary.
> 
> 

Applied to arm64 (for-next/trivial), thanks!

[1/1] arm64: paravirt: remove conduit check in has_pv_steal_clock
  https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/1e55b44d9ecd

Cheers,
-- 
Will

https://fixes.arm64.dev
https://next.arm64.dev
https://will.arm64.dev
___
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm


Re: [PATCH] arm64: paravirt: remove conduit check in has_pv_steal_clock

2022-11-04 Thread Steven Price
On 04/11/2022 06:16, Usama Arif wrote:
> arm_smccc_1_1_invoke() which is called later on in the function
> will return failure if there's no conduit (or pre-SMCCC 1.1),
> hence the check is unnecessary.
> 
> Suggested-by: Steven Price 
> Signed-off-by: Usama Arif 

Reviewed-by: Steven Price 

> ---
>  arch/arm64/kernel/paravirt.c | 4 
>  1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/paravirt.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/paravirt.c
> index 57c7c211f8c7..aa718d6a9274 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/paravirt.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/paravirt.c
> @@ -141,10 +141,6 @@ static bool __init has_pv_steal_clock(void)
>  {
>   struct arm_smccc_res res;
>  
> - /* To detect the presence of PV time support we require SMCCC 1.1+ */
> - if (arm_smccc_1_1_get_conduit() == SMCCC_CONDUIT_NONE)
> - return false;
> -
>   arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
>ARM_SMCCC_HV_PV_TIME_FEATURES, );
>  

___
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm


[PATCH] arm64: paravirt: remove conduit check in has_pv_steal_clock

2022-11-04 Thread Usama Arif
arm_smccc_1_1_invoke() which is called later on in the function
will return failure if there's no conduit (or pre-SMCCC 1.1),
hence the check is unnecessary.

Suggested-by: Steven Price 
Signed-off-by: Usama Arif 
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/paravirt.c | 4 
 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/paravirt.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/paravirt.c
index 57c7c211f8c7..aa718d6a9274 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/paravirt.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/paravirt.c
@@ -141,10 +141,6 @@ static bool __init has_pv_steal_clock(void)
 {
struct arm_smccc_res res;
 
-   /* To detect the presence of PV time support we require SMCCC 1.1+ */
-   if (arm_smccc_1_1_get_conduit() == SMCCC_CONDUIT_NONE)
-   return false;
-
arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
 ARM_SMCCC_HV_PV_TIME_FEATURES, );
 
-- 
2.25.1

___
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm