Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 1/8] arm64: microbench: get correct ipi received num

[Auger Eric]

Hi Jingyi,

On 7/2/20 5:01 AM, Jingyi Wang wrote:
> If ipi_exec() fails because of timeout, we shouldn't increase
> the number of ipi received.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jingyi Wang 
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger 

Thanks

Eric
> ---
>  arm/micro-bench.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arm/micro-bench.c b/arm/micro-bench.c
> index 4612f41..794dfac 100644
> --- a/arm/micro-bench.c
> +++ b/arm/micro-bench.c
> @@ -103,7 +103,9 @@ static void ipi_exec(void)
>   while (!ipi_received && tries--)
>   cpu_relax();
>  
> - ++received;
> + if (ipi_received)
> + ++received;
> +
>   assert_msg(ipi_received, "failed to receive IPI in time, but received 
> %d successfully\n", received);
>  }
>  
> 

___
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

[kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 1/8] arm64: microbench: get correct ipi received num

[Jingyi Wang]

If ipi_exec() fails because of timeout, we shouldn't increase
the number of ipi received.

Signed-off-by: Jingyi Wang 
---
 arm/micro-bench.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arm/micro-bench.c b/arm/micro-bench.c
index 4612f41..794dfac 100644
--- a/arm/micro-bench.c
+++ b/arm/micro-bench.c
@@ -103,7 +103,9 @@ static void ipi_exec(void)
while (!ipi_received && tries--)
cpu_relax();
 
-   ++received;
+   if (ipi_received)
+   ++received;
+
assert_msg(ipi_received, "failed to receive IPI in time, but received 
%d successfully\n", received);
 }
 
-- 
2.19.1


___
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm