Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Account activation for pootle service
Hi Rimas, On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 3:00 AM, Rimas Kudelis wrote: > Hi Danishka, > > 2011.02.04 16:16, Danishka Navin rašė: > > I could not find my account activation mail. >> >> Pls help me on activating my account 'danishka' for Sinhala (si) locale. >> > > It took me three days, but now it's done. Your account is activated. Please > forgive me for the delay. > > its ok. thanks for the support :) Regards, Danishka > Best regards and good luck in your work, > Rimas > > -- Danishka Navin http://danishkanavin.blogspot.com http://twitter.com/danishkanavin http://identi.ca/danishka -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to l10n+h...@libreoffice.org List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/l10n/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Estonian update
2011/2/7 Mihkel Tõnnov : > Hi *, > I finally managed to get OOo's Estonian translation and quickly > updated/adapted it for upcoming LibO 3.3.1 release. I hope I'm not too late > -- the "[libreoffice-l10n] Translation deadline changed?" thread suggests > not :) > > Anyway: https://et.libreoffice.org/assets/Uploads/ET-temp/GSI_et.sdf.bz2 > I used libreoffice-3-3-en-US-2011-02-01.* files from > http://login.kristshell.net/~olorin/ > There were some warnings at creation time, all like "po2oo: warning: No > template at None. Skipping blaah.po", but I t think/hope that's nothing > disastrous. Hi Mikhel, I commited your new translation. It is somewhat incomplete, but better that it was in the l10n repository. Best regards, Andras -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to l10n+h...@libreoffice.org List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/l10n/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: Updated breton translation and request for UI pootle setting
Hello, 2011.02.05. 16:58 keltezéssel, Drouizig írta: Here is an updated breton translation, http://meskach.free.fr/arbo/LibO/br-FR.sdf.gz and po files, if needed. http://meskach.free.fr/arbo/LibO/LibO.tar.bz2 The sdf passed the gsicheck. Breton imported and updated from templates. Are the numbers as expected? Rimas -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to l10n+h...@libreoffice.org List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/l10n/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Account activation for pootle service
Hi Danishka, 2011.02.04 16:16, Danishka Navin rašė: I could not find my account activation mail. Pls help me on activating my account 'danishka' for Sinhala (si) locale. It took me three days, but now it's done. Your account is activated. Please forgive me for the delay. Best regards and good luck in your work, Rimas -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to l10n+h...@libreoffice.org List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/l10n/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [libreoffice-l10n] l10n of LibreOffice 3.3.1
Rimas I am happy! :-) Olivier On 06-02-2011 18:16, Rimas Kudelis wrote: Hello Olivier, 2011.02.06 11:47, Olivier Hallot wrote: I don't think I have the rights to create a new project for pt-BR and and upload these files. Can you do that for me? Done, Rimas -- Olivier Hallot Founder, Steering Commitee Member - The Document Foundation Voicing the enterprise Translation Leader for Brazilian Portuguese -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to l10n+h...@libreoffice.org List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/l10n/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
[libreoffice-l10n] Branch libreoffice-3-3-1 created
Hi all, Similarly to the release of 3.3.0, we have created a branch for the stabilization of the 3.3.1, called 'libreoffice-3-3-1'. It is not based on a tag yet, Petr will tag tomorrow. The following rules apply: + any commit has to be reviewed by 3 people + preferably commit only translation fixes, or blocker fixes + only cherry-pick from the libreoffice-3-3 branch The 'libreoffice-3-3' branch is still active, will be used for the next bugfix release (3.3.2), and has the following rules: + any commit needs review by 1 person + only safe fixes are allowed + changes are regularly merged into master The 'master' branch is used for 3.4 development and has the rules: + free commit; do your best to do not break build and functionality + any development allowed For further information about the roadmap, please check http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan Now, if you want to switch your clone to the libreoffice-3-3-1 branch, do: git pull -r bin/g pull -r git checkout -b libreoffice-3-3-1 origin/libreoffice-3-3-1 bin/g checkout -b libreoffice-3-3-1 origin/libreoffice-3-3-1 Hopefully it will work for you :-) Most probably, you will also want to do (if you haven't done it yet): git config --global push.default tracking When you do git push with this, git will push only the branch you are on; ie. libreoffice-3-3-1 when you have switched to it. This will save you some git shouting at you. Happy hacking, Kendy -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to l10n+h...@libreoffice.org List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/l10n/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [libreoffice-l10n] l10n of LibreOffice 3.3.1
2011.02.05. 11:58 keltezéssel, Rhoslyn Prys írta: > The Welsh translation of 3.3 included some English strings. I should > have flagged up that there was a gap between the translation on Pavel's > server and the latest on the OO.o Pootle server.The latest Welsh > translation of OO.o is on the Pootle server. I'm having difficulty > accessing it at present (Permission Denied!) but it's nearly all there. > Thanks. > > Rhos > Hi Rhos, We did not used what was on Pavel's server. Last change to Welsh translation in l10n module was on 2009-05-28 - quite a long ago. :( For the next bugfix and l10n fix release of LibreOffice (3.3.2) we can sort this out. I suggest that you use TDF Pootle. I can help in converting your OOo translations for LibreOffice. Let me know what you think. Best regards, Andras -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to l10n+h...@libreoffice.org List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/l10n/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [libreoffice-l10n] l10n of LibreOffice 3.3.1
2011.02.07 20:41, Martin Srebotnjak rašė: 2011/2/7 Andras Timar Done, I think, and with backups this time. Care to check if the numbers are as expected? :) Looks perfect, because en-GB which was fully complete has only those 164 words untranslated which came from vcl/source/src/print.src. Good job. :) This check is for Pootle languages only? Slovenian should look 100% but I submitted an sdf file, so you probably can't check it. Yes. As you can see, Slovenian is not even imported. Rimas -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to l10n+h...@libreoffice.org List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/l10n/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [libreoffice-l10n] l10n of LibreOffice 3.3.1
2011/2/7 Andras Timar > > Done, I think, and with backups this time. Care to check if the numbers > > are as expected? :) > > > > Looks perfect, because en-GB which was fully complete has only those 164 > words untranslated which came from vcl/source/src/print.src. Good job. :) > This check is for Pootle languages only? Slovenian should look 100% but I submitted an sdf file, so you probably can't check it. Lp, m. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to l10n+h...@libreoffice.org List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/l10n/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [libreoffice-l10n] l10n of LibreOffice 3.3.1
2011.02.07. 18:51 keltezéssel, Rimas Kudelis írta: > 2011.02.07 00:11, Andras Timar rašė: >> 2011.02.06. 22:24 keltezéssel, Olav Dahlum írta: >>> How soon can we get templates to work with? >> Now. >> http://ftp.fsf.hu/LibreOffice/libreoffice-3-3-en-US-2011-02-06-UI.pot.tar.bz2 >> >> http://ftp.fsf.hu/LibreOffice/libreoffice-3-3-en-US-2011-02-06-help.pot.tar.bz2 >> >> bug#1632 was fixed and libreoffice-3-3-en-US-2011-02-01.sdf was used as >> SDF template. >> >> Rimas, is it possible to easily update existing translations in >> "LibreOffice 3.3.x – Merged Help" and "LibreOffice 3.3.x – Merged UI" >> modules with these new POT files? > > Done, I think, and with backups this time. Care to check if the numbers > are as expected? :) > Looks perfect, because en-GB which was fully complete has only those 164 words untranslated which came from vcl/source/src/print.src. Good job. :) Many thanks, Andras -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to l10n+h...@libreoffice.org List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/l10n/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [libreoffice-l10n] l10n of LibreOffice 3.3.1
2011.02.07 00:11, Andras Timar rašė: 2011.02.06. 22:24 keltezéssel, Olav Dahlum írta: How soon can we get templates to work with? Now. http://ftp.fsf.hu/LibreOffice/libreoffice-3-3-en-US-2011-02-06-UI.pot.tar.bz2 http://ftp.fsf.hu/LibreOffice/libreoffice-3-3-en-US-2011-02-06-help.pot.tar.bz2 bug#1632 was fixed and libreoffice-3-3-en-US-2011-02-01.sdf was used as SDF template. Rimas, is it possible to easily update existing translations in "LibreOffice 3.3.x – Merged Help" and "LibreOffice 3.3.x – Merged UI" modules with these new POT files? Done, I think, and with backups this time. Care to check if the numbers are as expected? :) Rimas -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to l10n+h...@libreoffice.org List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/l10n/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
[libreoffice-l10n] Estonian update
Hi *, I finally managed to get OOo's Estonian translation and quickly updated/adapted it for upcoming LibO 3.3.1 release. I hope I'm not too late -- the "[libreoffice-l10n] Translation deadline changed?" thread suggests not :) Anyway: https://et.libreoffice.org/assets/Uploads/ET-temp/GSI_et.sdf.bz2 I used libreoffice-3-3-en-US-2011-02-01.* files from http://login.kristshell.net/~olorin/ There were some warnings at creation time, all like "po2oo: warning: No template at None. Skipping blaah.po", but I t think/hope that's nothing disastrous. Best regards, Mihkel -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to l10n+h...@libreoffice.org List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/l10n/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [Libreoffice] [libreoffice-l10n] A possible future for LO help/lang packs?
On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 13:12 +0100, Andre Schnabel wrote: > > Von: Martin Srebotnjak .. > > just thinking loud (hope it is not too loud): is it possible to* make > > help packs into extensions* (oxt files)? Sounds (to me) like a really good idea :-) May not work well for Linux - where you want the help installed in the system, but that is different enough anyway. > I tried this briefly for one of the LibO beta versions. In theory > the mechanism is there but in reality I ended up with a mix of > English and German help. Maybe this could be fixed, but the no-go > for me was that the activation of the extension took about half an hour > (on a Windows7 DualCore AMD PC). Lol :-) that does sound deadly silly. > It does already, but currently it builds index files on installing / > activating the extension what takes a lot of time. I have no idea > if we could "prebuild" the index and put this into the extension. Oh - we can certainly special case / disable that for our extensions that already come with a pre-built help index. Better, we should speed up the indexing with clucene; but that is all quite do-able. It would help to have a stack trace of quite how the slowness gets called in that case though (if that is possible to get on Windows). Martin - is that something you might be interested in working on ? and/or if not - could you add it as an easy hack - which will need some research doing on it to make it easy [ samples of other code that packs extensions, thoughts on solving path problems on Mac vs. Windows etc. ]. ATB, Michael. -- michael.me...@novell.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to l10n+h...@libreoffice.org List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/l10n/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [libreoffice-l10n] A bug that could be a stopper for the L10N community
Hi, 2011.02.07 17:00, Sophie Gautier rašė: On 07/02/2011 17:45, Christian Lohmaier wrote: On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Martin Srebotnjak wrote: http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=58014 It is quite relevant for L10N teams and international users, even more for users that have spell-checking, thesaurus and grammar needs in the languages of their preference. It is present in OOo for a long time, but there was no will to squash it. There is no easy fix for this, due to the way it works on windows. There are static dummy-document that are then in turn copied to the location where you invoke the contextmenu→New function. So LO/OOo could only fix it by recognizing on open that it is a "shellnew" document and then replace it by itself using a document based on the default template. This is no problem if only OOo/LO is used to modify the documents, but of course when other applications are used to edit the documents, they'd ignore that property and then you risk that LO/OOo will throw away the existing changes when not checking for modifications, etc. Thanks for your analysis Christian. Is it possible the L10N list would nominate this bug as a stopper for LO3.4 or 3.3.2 or whichever version of LO? Well, without a proposed fix I agree on that that couldn't be a stopper, however there is a lot of duplicates on the issue, so it shows that it is often meet by a certain population of users. What I wanted to do is open the bug on our own tracker to have it in our radar and ask Fridrich to have a look at it. Here's a possible solution: step 1) don't put the files into the ShellNew folder. Quick googling reveals, that entries can be added to the New File menu using the registry instead of the template file. In that case, an empty file is being created. step 2) alter LibO's behaviour: when it's given an empty (0-byte) file to open, it should initialize it using the default template instead of doing what it does now. And here's what it does: * Writer presents a transcode dialog (which makes absolutely no sense since the amount of data to transcode is 0) * Math creates a valid archive instead of the file, but the archive totally empty, and Math's UI is not shown. It looks like Math simply quits * I haven't checked other applications. By the way, I gave Math as an example just because we don't provide a template for it, so it was quite easy to check quickly Another option would be to suggest the user to change the document language if no language is set for a document. But that would be quite annoying... Rimas -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to l10n+h...@libreoffice.org List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/l10n/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [libreoffice-l10n] A bug that could be a stopper for the L10N community
Hi all, On 07/02/2011 17:45, Christian Lohmaier wrote: Hi *, On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Martin Srebotnjak wrote: I already mentioned this bug some time ago on this list, I think: It helps to at least mention what you're talking about in the subject. Please choose a more telling subject next time. http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=58014 It is quite relevant for L10N teams and international users, even more for users that have spell-checking, thesaurus and grammar needs in the languages of their preference. It is present in OOo for a long time, but there was no will to squash it. There is no easy fix for this, due to the way it works on windows. There are static dummy-document that are then in turn copied to the location where you invoke the contextmenu→New function. So LO/OOo could only fix it by recognizing on open that it is a "shellnew" document and then replace it by itself using a document based on the default template. This is no problem if only OOo/LO is used to modify the documents, but of course when other applications are used to edit the documents, they'd ignore that property and then you risk that LO/OOo will throw away the existing changes when not checking for modifications, etc. Thanks for your analysis Christian. Is it possible the L10N list would nominate this bug as a stopper for LO3.4 or 3.3.2 or whichever version of LO? Well, without a proposed fix I agree on that that couldn't be a stopper, however there is a lot of duplicates on the issue, so it shows that it is often meet by a certain population of users. What I wanted to do is open the bug on our own tracker to have it in our radar and ask Fridrich to have a look at it. Kind regards Sophie -- Founding member of The Document Foundation -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to l10n+h...@libreoffice.org List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/l10n/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [libreoffice-l10n] A bug that could be a stopper for the L10N community
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Martin Srebotnjak wrote: > 2011/2/7 Christian Lohmaier > >> It helps to at least mention what you're talking about in the subject. >> Please choose a more telling subject next time. >> > > Thanks for your free lesson, but there is also something called "suspense": > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suspense No, it is a matter of attitude (my post is the most important, so everybody must read it). Many people on this list don't have just this list subscribed, but easily receive hundred messages a day. Not using a telling summary is either stealing their time, or just taking the risk of not being read at all. ciao Christian -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to l10n+h...@libreoffice.org List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/l10n/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [libreoffice-l10n] A bug that could be a stopper for the L10N community
2011/2/7 Christian Lohmaier > It helps to at least mention what you're talking about in the subject. > Please choose a more telling subject next time. > Thanks for your free lesson, but there is also something called "suspense": http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suspense Lp, m. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to l10n+h...@libreoffice.org List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/l10n/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [libreoffice-l10n] A bug that could be a stopper for the L10N community
Hi *, On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Martin Srebotnjak wrote: > > I already mentioned this bug some time ago on this list, I think: It helps to at least mention what you're talking about in the subject. Please choose a more telling subject next time. > http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=58014 > It is quite relevant for L10N teams and international users, even more > for users that have spell-checking, thesaurus and grammar needs in the > languages of their preference. It is present in OOo for a long time, > but there was no will to squash it. There is no easy fix for this, due to the way it works on windows. There are static dummy-document that are then in turn copied to the location where you invoke the contextmenu→New function. So LO/OOo could only fix it by recognizing on open that it is a "shellnew" document and then replace it by itself using a document based on the default template. This is no problem if only OOo/LO is used to modify the documents, but of course when other applications are used to edit the documents, they'd ignore that property and then you risk that LO/OOo will throw away the existing changes when not checking for modifications, etc. > Is it possible the L10N list would nominate this bug as a stopper for > LO3.4 or 3.3.2 or whichever version of LO? Well, without a proposed fix ciao Christian -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to l10n+h...@libreoffice.org List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/l10n/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: [Libreoffice] Mac builds / lang-packs ...
2011.02.07 13:17, Thorsten Behrens rašė: Michael Meeks wrote: Would it not be better in 3.4 (when we have solved the size issues) to have a single download (like Windows) that includes all the languages, and have an optional help-pack ? Yep - though I don't really like the installer concept on mac, I guess I'd then prefer to install all those langs unconditionally. If that turns out to cause issues, we can discuss other options. Well, all languages together (incl. help packs) would certainly take up a considerable amount of space. BTW, Mac OS X has a built-in package installer, which, while doesn't support uninstallation, seems to do everything else that we may need. Here's a HOWTO about it: http://s.sudre.free.fr/Stuff/PackageMaker_Howto.html In the second half of this document, there's information about making a metapackage, which is basically what we would need to make installing languages optional. With screenshots! ;) Rimas -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to l10n+h...@libreoffice.org List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/l10n/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
[libreoffice-l10n] Re: [Libreoffice] A possible future for LO help/lang packs?
Note that we don't want the situation were all UI languages are equal, but one UI language is more equal than the others. --tml -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to l10n+h...@libreoffice.org List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/l10n/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [libreoffice-l10n] A possible future for LO help/lang packs?
Hi Martin, 2011.02.07 13:37, Martin Srebotnjak rašė: Hi, just thinking loud (hope it is not too loud): is it possible to* make help packs into extensions* (oxt files)? Could this also be done with the lang-packs? The benefits: - *smaller file size*: extensions are great, because they are not executables and all the execution/installation code already lies within LO/OOo; - *lower cost of building/hosting*: a help pack would need to be built just once for all supported (and unsupported) operating systems; - *user-friendly*: a help pack can be dropped onto Extension Manager, double-clicked etc. It can also be downloaded at the last phase of the installation process with an installer on Windows and Linux etc. (an installer downloading and running another installer seems not so nice). - *localizer-friendly*: maybe Pootle server could be extended to generate helppacks (langpacks) daily/weekly or by demand - for testing purposes as well as for the release purposes; The drawbacks: - the extension framework maybe needs to be extended a bit to support help installation via extensions (but if needed at all that seems a reasonable investment to me, not knowing how much work that would present :) ); I think that it's a VERY VERY VERY good idea. ;) Rimas -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to l10n+h...@libreoffice.org List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/l10n/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [libreoffice-l10n] A possible future for LO help/lang packs?
Hi, > Von: Martin Srebotnjak > An: l10n@libreoffice.org > just thinking loud (hope it is not too loud): is it possible to* make > help packs into extensions* (oxt files)? I tried this briefly for one of the LibO beta versions. In theory the mechanism is there but in reality I ended up with a mix of English and German help. Maybe this could be fixed, but the no-go for me was that the activation of the extension took about half an hour (on a Windows7 DualCore AMD PC). ... > > The drawbacks: > - the extension framework maybe needs to be extended a bit to support help It does already, but currently it builds index files on installing / activating the extension what takes a lot of time. I have no idea if we could "prebuild" the index and put this into the extension. Regards, André -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to l10n+h...@libreoffice.org List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/l10n/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
[libreoffice-l10n] A possible future for LO help/lang packs?
Hi, just thinking loud (hope it is not too loud): is it possible to* make help packs into extensions* (oxt files)? Could this also be done with the lang-packs? The benefits: - *smaller file size*: extensions are great, because they are not executables and all the execution/installation code already lies within LO/OOo; - *lower cost of building/hosting*: a help pack would need to be built just once for all supported (and unsupported) operating systems; - *user-friendly*: a help pack can be dropped onto Extension Manager, double-clicked etc. It can also be downloaded at the last phase of the installation process with an installer on Windows and Linux etc. (an installer downloading and running another installer seems not so nice). - *localizer-friendly*: maybe Pootle server could be extended to generate helppacks (langpacks) daily/weekly or by demand - for testing purposes as well as for the release purposes; The drawbacks: - the extension framework maybe needs to be extended a bit to support help installation via extensions (but if needed at all that seems a reasonable investment to me, not knowing how much work that would present :) ); Lp, m. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to l10n+h...@libreoffice.org List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/l10n/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
[libreoffice-l10n] Re: [Libreoffice] Mac builds / lang-packs ...
Michael Meeks wrote: > Would it not be better in 3.4 (when we have solved the size issues) to > have a single download (like Windows) that includes all the languages, > and have an optional help-pack ? > Yep - though I don't really like the installer concept on mac, I guess I'd then prefer to install all those langs unconditionally. If that turns out to cause issues, we can discuss other options. Cheers, -- Thorsten -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to l10n+h...@libreoffice.org List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/l10n/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
[libreoffice-l10n] A bug that could be a stopper for the L10N community
Hello, I already mentioned this bug some time ago on this list, I think: http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=58014 It is quite relevant for L10N teams and international users, even more for users that have spell-checking, thesaurus and grammar needs in the languages of their preference. It is present in OOo for a long time, but there was no will to squash it. Is it possible the L10N list would nominate this bug as a stopper for LO3.4 or 3.3.2 or whichever version of LO? Thanks, m. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to l10n+h...@libreoffice.org List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/l10n/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
