[LAAMN] What will YOU do to Win the Peace TODAY?

2011-05-27 Thread Scott Peden
Send a few bucks if you have it, start your own movement if you have the
energy, but at least visit the web sites.

Scott



What will YOU do to Win the Peace TODAY?

We have asked ourselves this question many times, and bet you may have 
also.  Now we have embarked upon a coarse of action.

We are making feature film, 'Lysistrata Unleashed', a comedy based upon 
the ancient Greek play, 'Lysistrata' by Aristophanes.  This amazing 
theatre classic explores solutions to ending war though brilliant 
comedic satire.  It inspires direct personal action for solving deep 
economic and military issues.

Our movie is guaranteed to stimulate laughter first, and then dialog 
about how WE can achieve Peace in OUR world today.

http://www.LysistrataUnleashed.com

It is incredible how the problems of 25 centuries ago reflect upon the 
dire issues in our own world today.  And our theatrical audiences have 
expressed this to us precisely and emphatically.

Polls show that 60% of Americans don't want this endless war in the 
Middle East.

Which is why we are making this movie right now.  And why we believe its 
message is very timely and important.  Hence we strive to complete the 
film in short order, to be released this Fall.

What are YOU doing to win the Peace?

We would like to enlist your aid and support towards completing our 
movie, 'Lysistrata Unleashed'.

Our IndieGoGo campaign: http://igg.me/p/24968?a=14910i=shlk

Please send us $5 (or as much as you can) on IndieGoGo today, AND tell 
your friends, contacts and network(s) about the film.  We thank you for 
your support and participation.

Peace  Prosperity,
Phoenix and The Lysistrata Unleashed Team

PS: You can forward the above letter, use it as a model to re-write, or 
just send the links in with your own words, like below.
-- Checkout the cool Love  Peace movie project: -- 
http://igg.me/p/24968?a=14910i=shlk === 
 The website - http://www.LysistrataUnleashed.com The 
IndieGoGo - http://igg.me/p/24968?a=14910i=shlk




---
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---
Unsubscribe: mailto:laamn-unsubscr...@egroups.com
---
Subscribe: mailto:laamn-subscr...@egroups.com
---
Digest: mailto:laamn-dig...@egroups.com
---
Help: mailto:laamn-ow...@egroups.com?subject=laamn
---
Post: mailto:la...@egroups.com
---
Archive1: http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn
---
Archive2: http://www.mail-archive.com/laamn@egroups.com
---
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
laamn-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
laamn-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
laamn-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



[LAAMN] Santa Monica Airport Critics Speak Out at Activist Support Circle July 27 Public Gathering

2011-05-27 Thread jerrypeaceactivistrubin
 SPECIAL EVENT ADVISORY

 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
 Contact: Jerry Rubin  310-399-1000
 jerrypeaceactivistru...@earthlink.net

 Santa Monica Airport Critics Speak Out
 To Be Theme Of July 27 Activist Support Circle

 DATE-  Wednesday, July 27, 2011
 TIME-  7:00 PM (Refreshments served 6:30PM)
 LOCATION-  Friends Meeting Hall
 1440 Harvard Street, Santa Monica
 THEME- Santa Monica Airport Critics Speak Out

 Santa Monica and Los Angeles residents, environmental
 activists, and community group leaders who are critical of
 SMO and who are speaking out on SMO related concerns
 such as toxic air pollution, noise pollution, and public safety
 will be attending the support gathering.
 Participants will include:
 Martin Rubin-   Founder and Director of Concerned Residents
 Against Airport Pollution (CRAAP)
 Cathy Larson-   Chair, Friends of Sunset Park Airport Committee
 Laura Silagi-  Co-Chair, Venice Neighborhood Council Santa
 Monica Airport Committee
 Bill Koontz-   Co-Chair, Mar Vista Community Airport Committee

 The support gathering is free and there is free on-site parking.

 The Activist Support Circle is an ongoing and open support group
 for progressive activists that began in February, 2005 to help
 guard against activist burnout.

 For further information:
 Call-  310-399-1000
 E-mail-  activistsupportcir...@earthlink.net
 Website-  www.ActivistSupportCircle.org

 




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





---
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---
Unsubscribe: mailto:laamn-unsubscr...@egroups.com
---
Subscribe: mailto:laamn-subscr...@egroups.com
---
Digest: mailto:laamn-dig...@egroups.com
---
Help: mailto:laamn-ow...@egroups.com?subject=laamn
---
Post: mailto:la...@egroups.com
---
Archive1: http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn
---
Archive2: http://www.mail-archive.com/laamn@egroups.com
---
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
laamn-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
laamn-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
laamn-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



[LAAMN] CANCELLATION

2011-05-27 Thread John Johnson




WE HAD NOT REALIZED IT WAS FATHER'S DAY
We apologize!
The e-mail that was sent out for Sally  Peter's garage sale
for the 19th of June is CANCELLED.
Thank You Kindly,
Paz,
Sally  Peter




John Johnson
Change-Links Progressive Newspaper
change-li...@change-links.org
http://change-links.org
Subscribe to our list server. Email  change-links-subscr...@yahoogroups.com
(818) 782-1412
Cell (818) 681-7448.

===


http://change-links.org/animated%20palestine%20flag1.gif 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





---
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---
Unsubscribe: mailto:laamn-unsubscr...@egroups.com
---
Subscribe: mailto:laamn-subscr...@egroups.com
---
Digest: mailto:laamn-dig...@egroups.com
---
Help: mailto:laamn-ow...@egroups.com?subject=laamn
---
Post: mailto:la...@egroups.com
---
Archive1: http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn
---
Archive2: http://www.mail-archive.com/laamn@egroups.com
---
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
laamn-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
laamn-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
laamn-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



[LAAMN] [womeninblack] Jasmina Tesanovic: Mladic

2011-05-27 Thread Karin Pally
 Mensaje original 
Asunto: Mladic
Fecha:  Thu, 26 May 2011 14:08:30 -0700 (PDT)
De: jasmina tesanovic politicalid...@yahoo.com



The self proclaimed God of genocide in Srebrenica, the Serbian ethnic 
generalRatko Mladic was arrested today in a small village  eighty 
kilometers from Belgrade.

Mladic sheltered there with a relative, and lived under a false 
name.   For years on end he hid like a house-mouse, and was arrested 
with a similar meekness.


Old, docile, with one hand crippled, the formerly ferocious warlord 
lived peaceably and invisibly in a house that had been searched 
repeatedly by the Serbian police.   This long-wanted war criminal and 
exceedingly successful fugitive from justice had a 10 million euro award 
on his head.

And yet, recent polls say that, despite the suffering and ignominy he 
brought them, 51 percent of Serbian citizens would not have given him up 
to the international war tribunal in the Hague.  No, not for any money.  
Serbian stubbornness has gone beyond the period of Mladic's bloodstained 
hero-worship.  Nowadays the Serbs have grown indifferent to Mladic while 
actively resenting the European Union, whose economic disorders have 
made Serbian life miserable.

And yet it appears that somebody did betray Mladic for the reward: 
someone among his circle of close friends. Some years ago, an entire 
group of people, who were all accused of actively sheltering Mladic, 
were released from a Serbian court through lack of evidence.

After his arrest, only a few drunken people gathered before his hideout, 
and also in downtown Belgrade: the usual hooligan nationalist bands. 
Mladic was taken to thespecial court of war crimes in Belgrade to be 
interrogated. But this effort was interrupted because of the former 
general's difficult psychological and physical condition.

Mladic seems to have been babbling, but he managed to say, according to 
his lawyer, that he does not recognize the war tribunal in Hague, and 
will not plead guilty or innocent.  He was armed with two pistols when 
he was arrested, but he gave himself peacefully.

Who will pick up the 10 million euro reward? How much prosperity did 
Ratko Mladic cost Serbia over these 16 years?  These money issues  are 
the big questions in Serbian press. Although the police said they will 
not take a penny, they did their regular job.

As a further financial twist, the state still owes the general his 
regular pension, which he never received (as a fugitive).  Handsome 
lump-sums have paid by and to the other citizens of the state -- mainly, 
blood money for his victims.

And what about the dead? Do they have a price? Gone without a name, many 
of them still without graves since their bodies, dismembered and 
scattered all over the territory are still being sought. The silence of 
the ghosts is loud as ever in this moment of joy  and victory.

More recently, European pressure has intensified from the Hague 
tribunal; on June 6 the Serbian government faced a grim report from 
Serbia by Serge Brammertz, citing them for non-cooperation with the 
United Nations. Europe is experiencing many difficulties, but Serbia, 
like a tin can tied to a cat's tail, suffers them even more so.

The primary obstacle to Serbia's European harmonization is and was, of 
course,  the genocidal war criminal Ratko Mladic.

We citizens of Serbia all knew that Mladic was hiding among us in 
Serbia; don't ask me why, but we never believed the many tales spread 
about his death or his exile.   Given his modest rural circumstances, he 
was concealed more discreetly than the Pakistanis hid Osama bin Laden -- 
but the parallels there are obvious.  Mladic had his protectors in the 
covert wing of the government, and the Serbian government is 
traditionally an enterprise in which everything is covert, and yet 
everybody knows. Ask them not why they turned him in, but  why they 
delayed until today.

A couple of years ago, Radovan Karadzic,  the mastermind of the ethnic 
cleansing inBosnia, was arrested in downtown Belgrade.  Dr. Karadzic had 
been hiding under a long beard as a New Age quack guru.  Witnessing this 
travesty on television,  my aged father said: Ratko Mkadic is a 
soldier!  He will never do a thing like that!  He will rather commit 
suicide than humiliate himself in that manner or get arrested by 
police!  Mladic will never go to The Hague!

The same myth of fearless valor was running for the late president of 
Serbia, Milosevicwho actually was arrested and died in  The Hague.  
Milosevic was a close collaborator with the Bosnian Serb warlords, 
Karadzic and Mladic, in surpressing the Muslim population of Bosnia.

   This demon dream team of Balkan genocide: Milosevic, Mladic and 
Karadzic, were all destined for The Hague.  They were playing chess with 
one another in the anteroom of justice, waiting for a sentence longer 
than their lives.  Only death could bring them peace and liberation. 
Radovan Karadzic  

[LAAMN] Venezuela: 900 representatives of factory committees meet to strengthen the fight for Workers' Control

2011-05-27 Thread Cort Greene
To view the photos at end article, please click on the url:

http://www.marxist.com/venezuela-900-representatives-strengthen-workers-control.htm
 Venezuela: 900 representatives of factory committees meet to strengthen the
fight for Workers'
Controlhttp://www.marxist.com/venezuela-900-representatives-strengthen-workers-control.htm
Written by Patrick Larsen in Ciudad Guayana Friday, 27 May 2011
[image: 
Print]http://www.marxist.com/venezuela-900-representatives-strengthen-workers-control/print.htm#

*On the 21st of May, a spectacular meeting of more than 900 worker activists
took place at the SIDOR steel works in Ciudad Guayana in the eastern part of
Venezuela. The purpose of this encounter was to discuss the ongoing struggle
for workers' control in the Bolivarian Revolution.*

[image: 
guayana-completo]http://www.marxist.com/images/stories/venezuela/guayana-completo.jpgAfter
a short cultural event on Friday, the meeting itself opened on
Saturday 21stof May in the theatre hall of SIDOR. This venue has a
total capacity of 550,
but the room quickly got completely packed, with more than 200 extra workers
following the proceedings standing up. More workers joined the meeting on
Sunday, thus giving a total assistance of 900. The opening ceremony was
especially emotive, with the singing of the Venezuelan national anthem
followed by the anthem of the world proletariat: The International.

The meeting had been organized by different groups, most of them from the
UNT trade union confederation. It is worth pointing out, that the workers'
leaders of the Basic Industries in Guayana, Venezuela's Industrial
heartland, had played an extraordinary role in the convening of this
gathering. This should not surprise anyone, as Guayana is the place where
the struggle for workers' control has reached the most advanced level, being
confronted directly with physical violence on the part of the bureaucratic
factions in the state apparatus.

The gathering at SIDOR was probably one of the most representative meetings
of the Venezuelan labour movement in the last couple of years. Around one
hundred factories were represented and the participants had come from 21 out
of Venezuela's 24 states. The logistics of the meeting had been organized by
the workers of Guayana, based mainly on voluntary work and the sacrifices of
the ordinary workers who opened their houses to give accommodation to the
participants from other parts of the country.

The proceedings of the meeting were divided into three parts: 1) Exchanges
of experiences of workers' control 2) Workshop discussion about the nature
and obstacles for workers' control and 3) Plenary session with the
conclusions and agreements of the encounter
Bureaucratic sabotage against workers' control

A theme that sprung up again and again was the way in which the bureaucratic
sectors of the state are constantly trying to undermine the implementation
of workers' control. Despite the fact that president Chávez on several
occasions has spoken energetically in favour of workers control and even
suggested that managers be elected in the state industries, local mayors and
governors are doing everything possible to crush such initiatives.

Almost every report at the meeting bear testimony to this fact. An important
moment at the SIDOR meeting was when Elio Sayago, the president of the
nearby aluminum plant ALCASA addressed the audience. Sayago is a worker of
ALCASA who was appointed president of the factory by Chávez in May 2010,
after having been recommended by his co-workers. At that time Chávez called
upon the workers to implement workers' control and he appointed other
workers in SIDOR, BAUXILUM and VENALUM as presidents of the factories.

[image: guayana-mesas]However, in the year which has passed, the governor of
Bolívar State, Rangel Gómez (who was elected on a PSUV ticket) has been
actively supporting the FBT (Bolivarian Workers' Force), a trade union
faction which is using violent methods to sabotage the implementation of
workers' control. In the case of ALCASA, this took the form of a violent
picket which lasted for 34 days, during which hired gangsters took control
of the factory gates, in order to sabotage production. The aim was to bring
down Sayago and stop the process of workers' control that he is trying to
develop. Similar actions have taken place in BAUXILUM and, to a lesser
degree, in SIDOR.

The interventions of workers from other parts of the country pointed in the
same direction. Yenni Cortéz of the GOTCHA factory in Maracay, Aragua state,
explained how both the governor and the local mayor has turned a deaf ear to
the constant appeals for nationalization of this textile firm, which has
been occupied for two years by its female workers.

Yahaira López, member of the factory committee at INAF, a factory in Cagua,
Aragua state, which produces articles for bathrooms, gave voice to the same
concerns, when she pointed out that the nationalization of the plant, which
was announced by 

[LAAMN] Alan Woods - Europe in crisis: Italy and Belgium next

2011-05-27 Thread Cort Greene
http://www.marxist.com/europe-in-crisis-italy-and-belgium-next.htm


 Europe in crisis: Italy and Belgium
nexthttp://www.marxist.com/europe-in-crisis-italy-and-belgium-next.htm
Written by Alan Woods Thursday, 26 May 2011
[image: 
Print]http://www.marxist.com/europe-in-crisis-italy-and-belgium-next/print.htm#

*The Euro zone is in a mess. After a year of huge financial bail outs
intended to calm the markets, the latter are very unstable, with a marked
downward tendency. Signs of slowing global growth, and the continuing euro
zone debt crisis, have caused the markets to slump. The nervousness of the
markets is an accurate reflection of the growing anxiety of the bourgeois
about the economic prospects for Europe.*

[image: The Euro - a bomb waiting to explode. Illustration: Latuff  Dromos]
http://www.marxist.com/images/stories/europe/Latuff_n_Dromos-Euro_timebomb.gif
“*Events in Greece have brought the euro area to a crossroads: the future
character of European monetary union will be determined by the way in which
this situation is handled.”* (Jens Weidmann, Bundesbank president and
European Central Bank governing council member, Hamburg, May 20)

The politicians are panicking once again. Their latest recipe to raise cash
is to privatise on a massive scale. In a desperate attempt to raise cash,
the Spanish government is selling off the family jewels. They are
privatising the state lottery, as well as the state airports authority. The
sale of the state lottery is expected to raise between €6.5bn and €7.5bn. If
completed it would create Europe’s most valuable listed gaming group. That
will make a lot of money for big business, but it will lose money for the
Spanish state. The state lottery earned a net profit of just under €3bn in
2009, with €2.92bn going to the Spanish treasury. This is an excellent
example of the plundering of the state: nationalizing the losses and
privatizing the profits.

Already the big banks are queuing up to get their hands on this highly
profitable business. Lazard is viewed by company insiders as a favourite to
manage the process, with Goldman Sachs, Citigroup and Morgan Stanley among
several others that are in the running for other roles, which count among
the most prestigious investment banking outfits. Given their record in
gambling (and losing) billions of their clients’ money, thus provoking a
collapse of the world’s banking system three years ago, they seem well
qualified for the running of the world's largest gambling company.

But the main concern is still Greece, which they are pressurizing to
privatise more than the previously agreed €50bn. The only snag is that the
EU doesn't trust the Greeks to do it themselves. Instead, they want an
“independent commission” to do the dirty work.
“Make the Greeks pay!”

“Sell your islands, you bankrupt Greeks - and the Acropolis too!” The
hysterical headline of *Bild*, Germany’s leading tabloid when the dire state
of Greece’s finances was first made public sounded like the usual
exaggerations of the yellow press. But one year later, the same far from
elegant message is being delivered by Europe’s finance ministers. As we
predicted, the rescue package to Portugal was not enough to stop the crisis
spreading to Spain, Belgium and Italy. Now everybody is talking about
contagion.

At a time when the attentions of the world’s press were fully occupied with
the exciting adventures of the (former) President of the IMF and a certain
chambermaid in a New York hotel, the heads of European finance were busy
deciding the destinies of millions of people in Greece. Serious commentators
expressed concern lest the absence of DSK (unavoidably detailed as a guest
of the New York Police Department) might affect the efficacy of the
proceedings. They need not have worried.

The trials and tribulations of Monsieur Strauss Khan did not prevent the
recent meeting in Luxembourg, where ministers from the countries that use
the euro delivered a harsh message to the people and government of Greece:
push through more reforms and privatize everything, or you will not receive
a single euro more from your European “partners”.

This indicates that Europe’s financial crisis is not over. On the contrary,
it is entering a new and even more dangerous phase. All the rescue packages
have failed to save the Greek economy, which continues to fall. The mood in
Germany is hardening. This is not just a reflection of public unease, or the
fears of Angela Merkel that she will not be reelected. It is a realization
that the financial resources of the Bundesbank are finite after all, and
cannot serve to prop up the whole of Europe.

The Germans are taking an increasingly harsh line. The Bundesbank, which
controls the EU’s purse strings, has warned that if politicians take even a
modest step towards a restructuring of the Greek debt, the ECB will cut
Greek banks off from its liquidity supply, triggering a financial collapse
that would push the country’s economy into the abyss. Today’s 

[LAAMN] Krugman: Medicare and Mediscares, Amy G: Vermont, a Healthy First

2011-05-27 Thread Ed Pearl
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/27/opinion/27krugman.html?nl=todaysheadlines
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/27/opinion/27krugman.html?nl=todaysheadlines
emc=tha212 emc=tha212

 


Medicare and Mediscares


Paul Krugman

NY Times: May 27, 2011

 

Yes, Paul Ryan, the chairman of the House Budget Committee, is a sore loser.
Why do you ask? 

To be sure, Mr. Ryan had reason to be upset after Tuesday's special election
in New York's 26th Congressional District. It's a very conservative
district, so much so that last year the Republican candidate took 76 percent
of the vote. Yet on Tuesday, Kathy Hochul, a Democrat, took the seat, with a
campaign focused squarely on Mr. Ryan's plan to dismantle Medicare and
replace it with a voucher system. 

How did Ms. Hochul pull off this upset? The Wisconsin congressman blamed
Democrats' willingness to shamelessly distort and demagogue the issue,
trying to scare seniors to win an election, and he predicted that by
November of next year the American people are going to know they've been
lied to. 

You can understand Mr. Ryan's bitterness. He has, after all, experienced
quite a comedown over the course of the past seven weeks. Until his Medicare
plan was rolled out in early April he had spent months bathing in warm
approbation from many pundits, who had decided to anoint him as an icon of
fiscal responsibility. And the plan itself received rapturous praise in the
first couple of days after its release. 

Then people who actually know how to read a budget proposal started looking
at the plan. And that's when everything started to fall apart. 

Mr. Ryan may claim - and he may even believe - that he's facing a backlash
because his opponents are lying about his proposals. But the reality is that
the Ryan plan is turning into a political disaster for Republicans, not
because the plan's critics are lying about it, but because they're
describing it accurately. 

Take, for example, the statement that the Ryan plan would end Medicare as we
know it. This may have Republicans screaming Mediscare! but it's the
absolute truth: The plan would replace our current system, in which the
government pays major health costs, with a voucher system, in which seniors
would, in effect, be handed a coupon and told to go find private coverage. 

The new program might still be called Medicare - hey, we could replace
government coverage of major expenses with an allowance of two free aspirins
a day, and still call it Medicare - but it wouldn't be the same program.
And if the cost estimates of the Congressional Budget Office are at all
right, the inadequate size of the vouchers - which by 2030 would cover only
about a third of seniors' health costs - would leave many if not most older
Americans unable to afford essential care. 

If anyone is lying here, it's Mr. Ryan himself, who has claimed that his
plan would give seniors the same kind of coverage that members of Congress
receive - an assertion that is completely false. 

And, by the way, the claim that the plan would keep Medicare as we know it
intact for Americans currently 55 or older is highly dubious. True, that's
what the plan promises, but if you think about the political dynamics that
would emerge once Americans born a year or two too late realize how much
better a deal slightly older Americans are getting, you realize that this is
a promise unlikely to be fulfilled. 

Still, are Democrats doing a bad thing by telling the truth about the Ryan
plan? If you demagogue entitlement reform, says Mr. Ryan, you're
hastening a debt crisis; you're bringing about Medicare's collapse. Maybe
he should have a word with his colleagues who greeted the modest, realistic
cost control efforts in the Affordable Care Act with cries of death
panels. 

Anyway, the underlying premise behind statements like that is the assumption
that the Ryan plan represents a serious effort to come to grip with
America's long-run fiscal problems. But what became clear soon after that
plan was unveiled was that it was no such thing. In fact, it wasn't really a
deficit-reduction plan. Once you remove the absurd assumptions -
discretionary spending, including defense, falling to Calvin Coolidge
levels, and huge tax cuts for corporations and the rich, with no loss in
revenue? - it's highly questionable whether it would reduce the deficit at
all. 

What the Ryan plan is, instead, is an attempt to snooker Americans into
accepting a standard right-wing wish list under the guise of deficit
reduction. And Americans, it seems, have seen through the deception. 

So what happens now? The fight will shift from Medicare to Medicaid - a
program that has become an essential lifeline for many Americans, especially
children, but which in the Ryan plan is slated for a 44 percent cut in
federal aid over the next decade. At this point, however, I'm optimistic
that this initiative will also run aground on popular disapproval. 

What of Mr. Ryan's hope that voters will realize that they've been lied to?

[LAAMN] labor law reform - a key battle for mexican unions today

2011-05-27 Thread David Bacon
Labor Law Reform - A Key Battle for Mexican Unions Today
by David Bacon

Published by the Americas Program on: May 26, 2011
http://www.cipamericas.org/archives/4654

Editor's Note: This is the second installment of 
a series on border solidarity by journalist and 
immigration activist David Bacon. This article 
and subsequent installments were originally 
published in the Institute for Transnational 
Social Change's report Building a Culture of 
Cross-Border Solidarity. To download a PDF of the 
entire report, visit the Americas Program website.


Changing Mexico's labor law threatens the lives 
of millions of workers.  It would cement the 
power of a group of industrialists who have been 
on the political offensive for decades, and who 
now control Mexico's presidency and national 
government.   Labor law reform will only benefit 
the country's oligarchs, claims Andres Manuel 
Lopez Obrador, who most Mexicans think won the 
last presidential election in 2006, as candidate 
of the left-wing Party of the Democratic 
Revolution.  Napoleon Gomez Urrutia, head of the 
miner's union who was forced into exile in Canada 
in 2006, says Mexico's old governing party, the 
Party of the Institutionalized Revolution (PRI), 
which lost control of the presidency in 2000, is 
trying to assure its return by making this gift 
to big business, putting an end to labor rights.

In part, the change is drastic because on paper, 
at least, the rights of Mexican workers are 
extensive, deriving from the Revolution that 
ended in 1920.  At a time when workers in the 
U.S. still had no law that recognized the 
legality of unions, Article 123 of the Mexican 
Constitution spelled out labor rights.  Workers 
have the right to jobs and permanent status once 
they're hired.  If they're laid off, they have 
the right to severance pay.  They have rights to 
housing, health care, and training.  In a legal 
strike, they can string flags across the doors of 
a factory or workplace, and even the owner can't 
enter until the dispute is settled. 
Strikebreaking is prohibited.

A new labor law would change most of that.

Companies would be able to hire workers in a 
six-month probationary status, and then fire them 
at the end without penalty.  Even firing workers 
with 20 or 30 years on the job would suddenly 
become much easier and cheaper, by limiting the 
penalty for unjust termination to one year's 
severance pay.  That's an open invitation to 
employers, according to Arturo Alcalde, Mexico's 
most respected labor lawyer and past president of 
the National Association of Democratic Lawyers. 
The bosses themselves say the PRI reform is the 
road to a 'paradise of firings.'  It will make it 
much cheaper for companies to terminate workers.

The justification, of course, is that by reducing 
the number of workers at a worksite, while 
requiring those remaining to work harder, 
productivity increases and profits go up.  For 
workers, though, a permanent job and stable 
income become a dream, while the fear of firing 
grows, hours get longer, and work gets faster, 
harder and more dangerous.

The PRI labor law reform proposal deepens those 
changes.  The 40-hour workweek was written into 
the Federal Labor Law, which codified the rights 
in Article 123.  That limit would end.  Even the 
current 7-peso/hour minimum wage ($5/day) would 
be undermined, as employers would gain the 
unilateral right to set wages.  The independent 
review of safe working conditions would be 
heavily restricted.

Mexican workers aren't passive and organize work 
stoppages and protests much more frequently than 
do workers in the U.S.  Greater activity by angry 
workers, therefore, wouldn't be hard to predict. 
So the labor law reform takes this into account 
as well.

Even in union workplaces with a collective 
agreement setting wages and conditions, an 
employer could force workers to sign individual 
agreements with fewer rights or lower wages. 
Companies could subcontract work with no limit, 
giving employers the ability to find low-cost 
contractors with no union to replace unionized, 
higher-wage employees.  And it would become much 
more difficult to go on strike.

THE proposed labor law reform is the fourth in a 
series of basic changes in Mexico's economic, 
legal and political framework over the last 
decade.  A fiscal reform began the process of 
privatizing the country's pension system, much 
like the Social Security privatization plans 
proposed for the U.S.  Teachers charge that 
Mexican education reform is intended to remove 
their influence over the curriculum, which still 
espouses values that would seem very progressive 
in a U.S. classroom.  In many cases, they say, it 
will remove them from their jobs also.  Current 
Mexican President Felipe Calderon of the National 
Action Party (PAN) proposed an energy reform 
aimed at privatizing the national oil company, 
Pemex.  Fierce opposition, however, was able to 
restrict it to some degree.

All the 

[LAAMN] Ash: Post bin Laden America

2011-05-27 Thread Ed Pearl

http://www.readersupportednews.org/opinion2/275-42/6068-post-bin-laden-ameri
ca


Post bin Laden America


By Marc Ash, Reader Supported News

27 May 11


Reader Supported News | Perspective 

 

sama bin Laden is dead.

Of course he deserved it, that is not the question. The question is, what
did we deserve?

The attacks of September 11th, 2001, came out of a clear blue sky, and out
of the blue it seemed, came the news that the mastermind of the attacks,
Osama bin Laden, was dead. Killed - President Barack Obama announced in a
special late night address from the White House - by a US Special Forces
team.

Brushed aside by the jubilant young crowds who flocked to the White House
that evening were any questions about the legality of the US sending an
extra-judicial assassination team to foreign soil, in this case Pakistan, to
carry out the killing. It is, however, in that disregard for international
law in pursuit of the head of Osama bin Laden, that bin Laden's own legacy
survives him.

America after bin Laden is sadly an America more in line with bin Laden's
own ideological perspective. We are a more intolerant, more repressive and
socially restrictive society than we ever had been before bin Laden. Many of
the most draconian new social measures have come at the hands of those who
postured themselves as bin Laden's most ardent foes, and freedom's
staunchest defenders. If the object was to, defeat bin Laden, not become
him, clearly from a standpoint of social justice in America, we have
failed.

The issues are stark and substantive. Political surveillance and repression
in the US are at levels not seen since the darkest days of Joseph McCarthy's
communist witch hunts and J. Edgar Hoover's COINTELPRO.

We are now an America that rationalizes and debates the merits of torture.
From the talk shows to the floor of congress - that, which for one hundred
and fifty years has been unspeakable conduct for an American government, now
has openly shameless defenders. Among them, a prominent law professor from
Berkeley, and a sitting judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the
Ninth Circuit. Both apparently enjoying unassailable careers. Both legal
advisors to George W. Bush who crafted legal opinions justifying - if
renaming - what the world calls torture.

Perhaps bin Laden was rendered lifeless by SEAL Team 6, but he is very much
alive in the way we live our lives today in this land that's known as
freedom.

The government is now allowed to tap your phone without a warrant. Repeat:
The government is now allowed to tap your phone without a warrant. In fact,
Congress said so twice. First in a knee-jerk piece of legislation that bin
Laden must have had a good laugh over called the USA PATRIOT Act, and then,
in case you didn't hear it the first time, in the FISA Amendments Act, which
expressly validated warrantless wiretapping, and retroactively indemnified
the telecommunications companies from lawsuits for having done it at the
behest of the Bush administration.

Osama bin Laden, the gift that keeps on giving.

Surveillance of anti-war groups, no problem, blame it on bin Laden. Free
speech zones, cameras, cameras everywhere, warfare and military
glorification restored after decades of post-Vietnam distain, citizen's
rights to privacy all but canceled, separation of church and state open to
interpretation. The list goes on and on. Worst of all, education vilified,
and ignorance encouraged.

It's Osama's America now.

Maybe the attacks of September 11th and the news of bin Laden's death came
out of the blue, but Osama bin Laden certainly did not. The offspring of a
wealthy Saudi bin Laden family heavily connected to the Saudi royal family,
western interests and particularly US oil interests, Osama was educated in
England at Oxford, trained and armed by US operatives to fight with the
Mujahideen against the Soviets after the CIA baited them into the so-called
Afghan trap. Robert Scheer lays it all out brilliantly in his essay titled
A Monster of Our Own Creation
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/a_monster_of_our_own_creation_20110504/
 .

The Osama bin Laden that we have come to dread was indeed a monster of our
own creation, but more precisely a tool of the same capitalist, colonialist
complex that benefits from the fear he and they thrive on.

In 1968, David Crosby, Stephen Stills, Graham Nash and Neil Young in their
song, Chicago http://bit.ly/m8v41i , asked a question: In a land that's
known as freedom, how can such a thing be fair?

  _  

Marc Ash is the founder and director of Reader Supported News, as well as
Truthout.

Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission
to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader
Supported News.

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





---
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network