I've sent you a copy privately, but I'd like to clarify that the play was about a Rational speaker (a speaker with the truth) and a Rhetorical speaker (a speaker with all the bells and whistles). It was a requirement that the audience reacted to the speakers positively or negatively. So while the argument itself may not be that convincing one of the speakers certainly is.
Heather Abbotsford, BC
Congratulations on your grade. And I'd like a copy, please -- if the chat can't/doesn't want to "support" it because of length, then privately. As for why... :)
I'm argumentative by nature, and I *like* a well-reasoned argument, whether I agree with the final "findings" or not; it's the beauty of looking at something (anything: lace problem, philosophical problem, language/thought process relationship, a twig) from more than one angle that appeals to me.
To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] containing the line: unsubscribe lace-chat [EMAIL PROTECTED] For help, write to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
