Re: chunks in exceptions
Ahh, I didn't realize I had to add angle brackets as well, the postag="" works. Thanks a lot! Andriy 2014-08-18 2:50 GMT-04:00 Marcin Miłkowski : > W dniu 2014-08-18 04:11, Andriy Rysin pisze: >> On 08/16/2014 06:07 PM, Daniel Naber wrote: >>> On 2014-08-11 01:47, Andriy Rysin wrote: >>> I was writing a rule were I had to catch a phrase with last word being noun, but only if that noun is not part of adverb chunk (with another word following). The best way to do that seems to use adverb chunk in exception but looks like this is not supported. >>> Sorry for the late reply. If by chunks you mean phrases (and not chunks >>> in the sense that the Language class has getChunker() implemented): the >>> reason that they are not supported is probably that adding support might >>> be difficult. The matching algorithm is already complicated. >>> >>> Note that you can use to specify patterns that prevent >>> matching. These match on the whole sentence, though, not at a specific >>> token. >>> >> No, I actually mean chunker (if I understand the concept correctly), I >> have some adverb chunks defined in multiwords and it would be nice to be >> abel to use them in exceptions and not just in tokens. >> E.g. «показати тією мірою» have chunk marker on тією and on >> мірою (besides their POS tags) so I would like to be able to use those. >> And I would like to stick to localized scope so using antipattern is not >> the best approach here. > > To have chunks, you'd have to add a separate interface for the chunker. > The tags you mention are *not* chunker tags, these are simple POS > tags and you can use them in exceptions as POS tags. > > Hope that helps. > > Best, > Marcin > > -- > ___ > Languagetool-devel mailing list > Languagetool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/languagetool-devel -- ___ Languagetool-devel mailing list Languagetool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/languagetool-devel
Re: chunks in exceptions
W dniu 2014-08-18 04:11, Andriy Rysin pisze: > On 08/16/2014 06:07 PM, Daniel Naber wrote: >> On 2014-08-11 01:47, Andriy Rysin wrote: >> >>> I was writing a rule were I had to catch a phrase with last word being >>> noun, but only if that noun is not part of adverb chunk (with another >>> word following). The best way to do that seems to use adverb chunk in >>> exception but looks like this is not supported. >> Sorry for the late reply. If by chunks you mean phrases (and not chunks >> in the sense that the Language class has getChunker() implemented): the >> reason that they are not supported is probably that adding support might >> be difficult. The matching algorithm is already complicated. >> >> Note that you can use to specify patterns that prevent >> matching. These match on the whole sentence, though, not at a specific >> token. >> > No, I actually mean chunker (if I understand the concept correctly), I > have some adverb chunks defined in multiwords and it would be nice to be > abel to use them in exceptions and not just in tokens. > E.g. «показати тією мірою» have chunk marker on тією and on > мірою (besides their POS tags) so I would like to be able to use those. > And I would like to stick to localized scope so using antipattern is not > the best approach here. To have chunks, you'd have to add a separate interface for the chunker. The tags you mention are *not* chunker tags, these are simple POS tags and you can use them in exceptions as POS tags. Hope that helps. Best, Marcin -- ___ Languagetool-devel mailing list Languagetool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/languagetool-devel
Re: chunks in exceptions
On 08/16/2014 06:07 PM, Daniel Naber wrote: > On 2014-08-11 01:47, Andriy Rysin wrote: > >> I was writing a rule were I had to catch a phrase with last word being >> noun, but only if that noun is not part of adverb chunk (with another >> word following). The best way to do that seems to use adverb chunk in >> exception but looks like this is not supported. > Sorry for the late reply. If by chunks you mean phrases (and not chunks > in the sense that the Language class has getChunker() implemented): the > reason that they are not supported is probably that adding support might > be difficult. The matching algorithm is already complicated. > > Note that you can use to specify patterns that prevent > matching. These match on the whole sentence, though, not at a specific > token. > No, I actually mean chunker (if I understand the concept correctly), I have some adverb chunks defined in multiwords and it would be nice to be abel to use them in exceptions and not just in tokens. E.g. «показати тією мірою» have chunk marker on тією and on мірою (besides their POS tags) so I would like to be able to use those. And I would like to stick to localized scope so using antipattern is not the best approach here. Thanks Andriy -- ___ Languagetool-devel mailing list Languagetool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/languagetool-devel
Re: chunks in exceptions
On 2014-08-11 01:47, Andriy Rysin wrote: > I was writing a rule were I had to catch a phrase with last word being > noun, but only if that noun is not part of adverb chunk (with another > word following). The best way to do that seems to use adverb chunk in > exception but looks like this is not supported. Sorry for the late reply. If by chunks you mean phrases (and not chunks in the sense that the Language class has getChunker() implemented): the reason that they are not supported is probably that adding support might be difficult. The matching algorithm is already complicated. Note that you can use to specify patterns that prevent matching. These match on the whole sentence, though, not at a specific token. Regards Daniel -- ___ Languagetool-devel mailing list Languagetool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/languagetool-devel
chunks in exceptions
Hi all I was writing a rule were I had to catch a phrase with last word being noun, but only if that noun is not part of adverb chunk (with another word following). The best way to do that seems to use adverb chunk in exception but looks like this is not supported. So after multiple experiments and reading our wiki pages I wrote a rule like this and it works but it does generate a warning: Running pattern rule tests for Ukrainian... The Ukrainian rule: PASSIVE_PREDICATE:1 (exception in token [4]), token [4], contains "тією мірою" that contains token separators, so can't possibly be matched. Current solution looks ugly and although it works I'd like to make it right. So the question is is there a reason why chunks are not supported in exceptions? And if there's a reason we should not support chunks in exceptions what's the best way to write a rule below (without splitting it to two or complicating it even more)? Thanks Andriy тією мірою -- ___ Languagetool-devel mailing list Languagetool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/languagetool-devel
