Re: [LARTC] htb errors, wrong patch?

2003-10-04 Thread Stef Coene
On Saturday 04 October 2003 02:52, Alex wrote:
 I downloaded iproute2-2.4.7-now-ss010824.tar.gz and I did patched tc with
 the htb3.6_tc.diff from htb3.6-020525.tgz and when I try to use a htb
 script I get just errors. I did not patch the kernel, since I use kernel
 2.4.21 and I saw on - HTB Homepage that I need to patch it only if I run
 version 2.4.20 or earlier. Do also need the kernel patch ? Or maybe is
 something else wrong?

 RTNETLINK answers: No such file or directory
 Deleted old root disk on eth0
 Unknown filter flowid, hence option 1:10 is unparsable
 Unknown filter flowid, hence option 1:2 is unparsable
 RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
 RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
 RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
 RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
Can you post us your commands and do you have the htb qdisc enabled in your 
kernel config?

Stef

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Using Linux as bandwidth manager
 http://www.docum.org/
 #lartc @ irc.openprojects.net

___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/


[LARTC] Client firewall scrueing up bandwith shapeing

2003-10-04 Thread Dragoº Cintezã
Hi

Here?s the deal: I have a LAN behind a linux box. The Linux box acts
as a NAT to all the hosts behind it. I'm classifying my hosts with
iptables:

/sbin/iptables -t mangle -A INPUT --in-interface $GREEN_DEV -s 192.168.1.1 -j MARK 
--set-mark 1 
...
/sbin/iptables -t mangle -A INPUT --in-interface $GREEN_DEV -s 192.168.1.7 -j MARK 
--set-mark 7 

/sbin/iptables -t mangle -A OUTPUT --out-interface $GREEN_DEV -d 192.168.1.1 -j MARK 
--set-mark 1 
...
/sbin/iptables -t mangle -A OUTPUT --out-interface $GREEN_DEV -d 192.168.1.7 -j MARK 
--set-mark 7 

/sbin/iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING --in-interface $GREEN_DEV -s 192.168.1.1 -j 
MARK --set-mark 1 
...
/sbin/iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING --in-interface $GREEN_DEV -s 192.168.1.7 -j 
MARK --set-mark 7 

/sbin/iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING --out-interface $GREEN_DEV -d 192.168.1.1 -j 
MARK --set-mark 1 
...
/sbin/iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING --out-interface $GREEN_DEV -d 192.168.1.7 -j 
MARK --set-mark 7

Then I want to give everybody a rate of 18kbit

# clean existing down- and uplink qdiscs, hide errors 
tc qdisc del dev eth1 root 2 /dev/null  /dev/null 
tc qdisc del dev eth0 root 2 /dev/null  /dev/null 

tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 10: htb 
tc class add dev eth1 parent 10: classid 10:10 htb rate 125kbit ceil 128kbit burst 4k 

tc class add dev eth1 parent 10:10 classid 10:1 htb rate 18kbit ceil 128kbit prio 2 
burst 4k 
tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 10:1 handle 1: sfq perturb 10 
tc filter add dev eth1 parent 10: protocol ip handle 1 fw classid 10:1 
tc filter add dev eth1 parent 10: protocol ip prio 2 u32 match ip src 192.168.1.1 
flowid 10:1 
tc filter add dev eth1 parent 10: protocol ip prio 3 u32 match ip dst 192.168.1.1 
flowid 10:1
...

with hosts 2 to 7 works fine, while bandwidth of host 1 it is not shaped at all (all 
pakets go to default-root qdisc)

The 192.168.1 is runing win xp and Zone Alarm firewall. Most of the hosts are runing 
WinXP with no problem.

My question: Can it be that the packets are not being identified corectly because of 
the ZA firewall on Host 1?
I had problems before with host 1 that blocked some ports with ZA that had the result 
of freazing the workgroup
while it was online. that problem was fixed anyway. 
Now please dont ask me to try to disable the ZA firewall because i have no access to 
host1.
And another thing: iptraf shows corectly that trafic is made from host 1 and its rate.

Thanks   

___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/


Re: [LARTC] htb errors, wrong patch?

2003-10-04 Thread Alex
I have everything cbq/htb and all the QoS stuff compiled directly in the
kernel, not as a module. The script is at
http://retea.hostingcenter.ro/htb.txt since is about 46k and is too big to
post here.

Thanks.

Alex
- Original Message - 
From: Stef Coene [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Lartc [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 04, 2003 12:41 PM
Subject: Re: [LARTC] htb errors, wrong patch?


 On Saturday 04 October 2003 02:52, Alex wrote:
  I downloaded iproute2-2.4.7-now-ss010824.tar.gz and I did patched tc
with
  the htb3.6_tc.diff from htb3.6-020525.tgz and when I try to use a htb
  script I get just errors. I did not patch the kernel, since I use kernel
  2.4.21 and I saw on - HTB Homepage that I need to patch it only if I run
  version 2.4.20 or earlier. Do also need the kernel patch ? Or maybe is
  something else wrong?
 
  RTNETLINK answers: No such file or directory
  Deleted old root disk on eth0
  Unknown filter flowid, hence option 1:10 is unparsable
  Unknown filter flowid, hence option 1:2 is unparsable
  RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
  RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
  RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
  RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
 Can you post us your commands and do you have the htb qdisc enabled in
your
 kernel config?

 Stef

 -- 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Using Linux as bandwidth manager
  http://www.docum.org/
  #lartc @ irc.openprojects.net

 ___
 LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/



___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/


[LARTC] Layer 7 support for tcng ?

2003-10-04 Thread Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Yep, thats right. Does it exist somewhere ? Will it ever ?

Currently i use tcng for my bandwidth shaping and i really didnt want to 
change to bare tc scripts.
- -- 
+-+
|PGP Public Key: http://sys49152.net/pubkey.asc   |
+-+
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/f3HHRslfH2ZQjFARArZFAKDmAOz0u0t2M+Rd8UIAah1FouwzLACdHnVW
zALy7xbns/KUZYk+87l8LwI=
=JIhc
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/


[LARTC] HTB qdisc, why quantum = 200000?

2003-10-04 Thread Nguyen Dang Phuoc Dong
Hi,

Can anybody explain to me why the upper limit of quantum of a HTB class is
20? Why the author choose this number? What if we expand this number,
for instant, 50?

Thank you in advance

Dong

___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/