[LARTC] Traffic shaping and IP aliases
Hi folks, I have the traffic shaping (HTB and IMQ) on my eth0 (of course no problems with it). And now I would like add some extra IPs on it (ifconfig eth0:0 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx and ifconfig eth0:1 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx). So do I have to set up a new tc rools ( tc qdisc add deveth0:0 root handle 1: htb default 20 r2q 5 ...)for the eth0:0 and eth0:1 or can still be only tc rules for the eth0? Thanks in advance Remus
[LARTC] kptd ipsec
hi all, could someone describe where the encryption de-encryption is in the kptd? thanks! charles ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Re: [LARTC] Traffic shaping and IP aliases
On Friday 23 Jan 2004 09:15, Remus wrote: Hi folks, I have the traffic shaping (HTB and IMQ) on my eth0 (of course no problems with it). And now I would like add some extra IPs on it ( ifconfig eth0:0 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx and ifconfig eth0:1 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx). So do I have to set up a new tc rools ( tc qdisc add dev eth0:0 root handle 1: htb default 20 r2q 5 ...) for the eth0:0 and eth0:1 or can still be only tc rules for the eth0? I've been wondering about the same thing recently. :-) As far as I have managed to find, the only way to do this is to set up dummy devices pointed at the real interface, and shape those instead. I haven't had a chance to try it yet, though... Gordan ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
RE: [LARTC] Traffic shaping and IP aliases
Can you even shape on aliases? I thought you could only shape on the actual device. Why not shape on the source or destination IP? Mike. -Original Message- From: Gordan Bobic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 5:52 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [LARTC] Traffic shaping and IP aliases On Friday 23 Jan 2004 09:15, Remus wrote: Hi folks, I have the traffic shaping (HTB and IMQ) on my eth0 (of course no problems with it). And now I would like add some extra IPs on it ( ifconfig eth0:0 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx and ifconfig eth0:1 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx). So do I have to set up a new tc rools ( tc qdisc add dev eth0:0 root handle 1: htb default 20 r2q 5 ...) for the eth0:0 and eth0:1 or can still be only tc rules for the eth0? I've been wondering about the same thing recently. :-) As far as I have managed to find, the only way to do this is to set up dummy devices pointed at the real interface, and shape those instead. I haven't had a chance to try it yet, though... Gordan ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/ ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
RE: [LARTC] Traffic shaping and IP aliases
Yes: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg07410.html search for the text alias bummer. Mike. -Original Message- From: Gordan Bobic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 5:52 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [LARTC] Traffic shaping and IP aliases On Friday 23 Jan 2004 09:15, Remus wrote: Hi folks, I have the traffic shaping (HTB and IMQ) on my eth0 (of course no problems with it). And now I would like add some extra IPs on it ( ifconfig eth0:0 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx and ifconfig eth0:1 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx). So do I have to set up a new tc rools ( tc qdisc add dev eth0:0 root handle 1: htb default 20 r2q 5 ...) for the eth0:0 and eth0:1 or can still be only tc rules for the eth0? I've been wondering about the same thing recently. :-) As far as I have managed to find, the only way to do this is to set up dummy devices pointed at the real interface, and shape those instead. I haven't had a chance to try it yet, though... Gordan ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/ ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
[LARTC] IMQ Stability
Hello all, I have been doing a lot of archive searching over the last week reading posts on IMQ and it's apparent stability / instability. I have seen a number of posts about it not being maintained as well. Can anyone talk to me about IMQ's stability in a heavy throughput environment (20 Mbps) and what was causing IMQ to fail if you know. Thanks, Mike ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
[LARTC] htbinit and redhat-9.0
dear All, I'm a new student and my job is too shapping bandwith for our campus faculty network. I want to implement htb with Redhat-9.0 distro. does this distro kernel support htb and tc good ? or i should apply some patch or upgrade kernel ? regards reza E0j)b bmj)fjwlffX)Z9diZ(
Re: [LARTC] htbinit and redhat-9.0
On Friday 23 January 2004 18:38, Mohammad Reza wrote: dear All, I'm a new student and my job is too shapping bandwith for our campus faculty network. I want to implement htb with Redhat-9.0 distro. does this distro kernel support htb and tc good ? or i should apply some patch or upgrade kernel ? Patch the kernel yourself so you are sure you have the latest htb. Stef -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using Linux as bandwidth manager http://www.docum.org/ #lartc @ irc.openprojects.net ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
[LARTC] Set IP Options
Hi All, I'm trying to do something regarding Bandwith Aggregation and I would need to set new options in the IP-header. I had been studying some kernel source that concern to the IP layer, but I don't really know how to set a new option. Does anyone have any idea to add new custom options into the IP header ? Thank you in advance Felipe Herrera ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
[LARTC] Deleting tc filters
I have a fairly sophisticated bandwidth control tree. I am using filters to allocate traffic to various HTB buckets according to packet marks. Nothing about that is terribly hard. The problem is that my user population is dynamic. Users appear and disappear over time. Also, the priority to which a user is entitled changes over time. So, as these changes occur, I need to delete and recreate various classes, and I need to change the associated filters in order to route user traffic to the appropriate places. Deleting and reconstructing the entire tree is not an option. The problem I'm running into is that it's *very* hard to figure out how to delete filters. And I'm not the only one who has found this difficult. After a lot of painful Googling, I found the following two outstanding examples: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg07359.html http://lists.nocat.net/pipermail/nocat/2003-April/003004.html Has anyone made any progress in figuring out the best way to do this? ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
[LARTC] sending same packet stream over both links
Hi, I have an application requirement that hints at the use of multicast, but I think it can be solved without it. |--- [Receiver 1] [Sender] --- [Relay/Router] | |--- [Receiver 2] There is a UDP stream from the [sender] that needs to reach both the receivers. Is it possible to direct the stream to the [Router] and have iproute2/iptable rules that modify the packets and send it to both the receivers? Thanks for your time. Regards, Amit -- .| Amit Kucheria |. ...| Wireless Systems Engineer |... .| Metric Systems Corp., San Diego, CA |. ..| www.metricsystems.com |.. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
