[LARTC] Re: [ANNOUNCE] iproute2 version (050929)

2005-10-10 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 12:34:51 +0200 (CEST)
Krzysztof Oledzki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 
 On Wed, 5 Oct 2005, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
 
  On Sat, 1 Oct 2005 23:34:25 +0200 (CEST)
  Krzysztof Oledzki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
 
  On Fri, 30 Sep 2005, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
 
  There is an new minor update to iproute2 utilities available:
http://developer.osdl.org/dev/iproute2/download/iproute2-050929.tar.gz
 
 
  It hangs on ip rule flush. Tested on 2.6.13.2.
 
 
  Best regards,
 
 
 Krzysztof Olędzki
 
  Fixed by this patch (in next release)
 
 Not sure... Just checked iproute2-ss051007 and it still hangs on ip rule 
 flush with ~100% cpu load.
 

Are you running as root? If not it will loop forever.
___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc


[LARTC] Prioritize ACK packets

2005-10-10 Thread Kenneth Kalmer
Guys

I'm a bit rusty and in a hurry, can anyone share with me how to
prioritze TCP/ACK packets on an outgoing interface... I need these
acknowledgements to get through on a congested DSL link...

Thanks in advance!

--

Kenneth Kalmer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] stats
http://vspx27.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/main.py?qtype=userpageusername=kenneth%2Ekalmer
___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc


[LARTC] Re: [ANNOUNCE] iproute2 version (050929)

2005-10-10 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 16:37:00 -0400
jamal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Mon, 2005-10-10 at 22:08 +0200, Krzysztof Oledzki wrote:
  
 
  
   Why are you trying to flush those tables?
  To install a new set of rules.
  
 
 
 flush should kill everything if i am not mistaken. 
 Are you replacing the main table etc as well?
 
   Try to downgrade the kernel and see what happens - go as far as 2.6.12
  But why? It works with older (ss050330) version of iproute2 even on 
  2.6.13.3.
  
 
 Ok, sorry i wasnt aware of that. Try the attached patch.
 
 cheers,
 jamal

Look like the -batch code that keeps the RTNL handle open was
breaking this.  The patch shows the general idea, but it still has
problems because I think it would still not work if used in
-batch situation.

-- 
Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OSDL http://developer.osdl.org/~shemminger
___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc