Re: [LARTC] Multi-path routing only using last nexthop in default route.

2006-01-18 Thread Julian Anastasov

Hello,

On Mon, 16 Jan 2006, Jody Shumaker wrote:

 ${IP} route add default table 221 proto static \
 nexthop via ${EXTGW2} dev ${EXTIF2} weight 1\
 nexthop via ${EXTGW1} dev ${EXTIF1} weight 5

 With this command, connections going out from my network always seem to use
 the GW1 route.  I if I reverse the order of the nexthop's to list GW1 first
 and GW2 second, then the reverse happens and all outgoign connections use
 GW2.  I'm going to attempt to test this better by attempting a large number
 of connections to a large list of ip's, but in running this setup I've never
 seen it use both gateway's.

Do you have script to ping/arping the gateways on eth device(s)?
The NOARP devices are always preferred if the GWs on ARP devices are
not marked reachable in ARP cache.

Regards

--
Julian Anastasov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc


[LARTC] Download and upload independency

2006-01-18 Thread Diego Cabrero

Hello everyone:
As it is known, when you limit uplink bandwidth it usually gets downlink 
bandwidth to a lower value.
I just want to know what is the optimal configuration for eth1 and imq0 
according to some variables of  tc(HTB), txqueuelen, mtu, etc. to make 
these packet flows less independent on an ethernet based network.




Thank you in advance.

-Diego

___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc


RE: [LARTC] Gred/dsmark/htb

2006-01-18 Thread comp.techs
Title: Re: [LARTC] Gred/dsmark/htb






Hi, thx for the reply. If I 
changed the parent to 2.0 for the filters this would not pass the minor classid 
field back to the tcindex, which is required for gred?

thx jason


From: Andy Furniss 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thu 1/12/2006 2:43 
PMTo: comp.techsCc: 
lartc@mailman.ds9a.nlSubject: Re: [LARTC] 
Gred/dsmark/htb

comp.techs wrote: Hi, I am trying to get assured 
forwarding/expedited forwarding with gred and htb working. Below is the script I 
am using. The following steps are what I thing is how the script works. 
My problem is that if I remove the HTB qdisc from the script and have the GREDS 
parent as the dsmark it works, but when I add the htb as a parent of GRED and 
DSmark the parent of htb it does not work? Any suggestion 
appreciated. thx jason 1. The DS field is 
marked by iptables in prerouting/mangle to the appropriate class. 
2. DSMark masks the ds and copies ths dscp to the tcindex field. 
3. filters are selected as per what dscp there handle is. 4. the 
minor of the filter is returned back to the dsmark and copied to the 
tcindex #!/bin/sh 
tc qdisc del dev eth0 root tc qdisc add dev eth0 handle 1:0 root dsmark 
indices 16 set_tc_index tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip 
prio 1 tcindex \ mask 0xfc shift 2 pass_on #af class 1I 
think all the filters below here should be on 2:0 tc filter add dev 
eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 1 \ handle 10 tcindex classid 
1:11 tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 1 \ 
handle 12 tcindex classid 1:12 tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 
protocol ip prio 1 \ handle 14 tcindex classid 1:13 #af class 
2Andy.


___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc