RE: [LARTC] wondershaper question

[Chris Winfield-Blum]

Maybe there is another solution to this problem?

The problem is that I have had a couple of users on the network hogging
the bandwidth and while we do have a policy implemented sometimes the
downloads are genuinely work related (eg downloaded a new version of an
application we use for development)

Sooo what I NEED is

A script that will ensure that ports 80, 25, 110, 443, etc are priority
Then that these are then are then "shaped" to not allow one person to
hog it all.

In an IDEAL situation I would like to break it up into classes

Server Class: that has access to ALL ports and are priority for any
traffic (maybe I can set them a guaranteed 100Kb/s) 

User Class: that has priority access (that doesn't override the server
class) to ports 80, 25, 110 etc. Perhaps the remaining 156Kb/s is
divided evenly?

Any suggestions? Im really NEW to this and would love some example
scripts (preferably commently highly :P hehe)

This was the address of the other script that I found:
http://www.surestorm.com/qos/

I am not "set" on using wondershaper..

Thanks for all your help

Chris

___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

[LARTC] wondershaper question

[Chris Winfield-Blum]

Hi I
am very unclear about the wonder shaper and a bit of a novice 

with
Unix all together 

 

I
have a question for you and I hope you can answer

 

Basically
my office is getting a couple of people slowing down the 

network
so ive been looking around and found wondershaper

 

What
I want to know is that can I rather than having low priority 

ports
have it with high priority ports

 

And
the same with high priority hosts...

 

Can I
have it so that say for example 192.168.1.2 192.168.1.3 are high 

priority
and port 20 22 80 443 110 25 etc are high priority?

 

Also
how do I clear the rules I have made with the script??

 

If I
want it to return to the default for example??

 

Thanks

 

Chris