Re: [LARTC] Need some help on HTB and IMQ

2003-02-25 Thread Dragan Zubac

Hi,

There is no options at all to 'shape' upload+download=fixed bandwidth
without using IMQ virtual device ? So if somebody is planning to give
customer fixed bandwidth regarless if a customer is 'uploading' or
'downloading',he (or she:) MUST use IMQ virtual device ? Anybody did some
tests of configuring same traffic shaping with and without using IMQ
device ? How IMQ device (kernel) will behave on heavy load traffic
(like VoIP,gaming,other 'real-time' traffic) comparing on mashine without
using IMQ virtual device ?
Does anybody did some test on using u32 filter and fw filter ? How does
each one behave on same mashine,same kernel,same traffic shaping
configuration ?

f2zubac

On Mon, 24 Feb 2003, Stef Coene wrote:

 On Monday 24 February 2003 21:19, hanumantha kavuluru wrote:
  Hi All,
  Thanks for the help. Stef, our product is already out in the market with
  2.4.18 kernel. So if we change the kernel, we will have to go through a
  full QA cycle which is something we don't want to do :).  
 Ok
 
  BTW, I would like
  to have global limits on the Bandwidth per user irrespective of  which
  interface the traffic might go.Can i do this without using IMQ?
 So you want up + down = fixed bandwidth?  Then you need IMQ.
 
  Also i want
  to do my own classification by setting the skb-priority field with the
  appropriate class ID. Is it possible to use this kind of classification
  with IMQ and HTB? 
 I don't know the internals of tc, but I think you can do.
 
 Stef
 
 -- 
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Using Linux as bandwidth manager
  http://www.docum.org/
  #lartc @ irc.oftc.net
 
 ___
 LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
 

___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/


Re: [LARTC] question re: longer-period fair sharing

2002-10-16 Thread Dragan Zubac


Hi,

Try a VPN solution with RADIUS accounting for amount of bytes each user
had transmit over the network.Radius protocol can do accounting bytes
(octects actually) as well 'online' time.In that way,You can have multiple
business policies for clients,one for kids,one for family,one for
guests,etc...
This solution maybe enters some delay in TCP/IP protocol,but guarantee You
secure connections (no more sniffing:),and You won't have possible trouble
about filtering MAC addresses of malicius clients trying to forge their IP
numbers if You have 'layer 3 accounting solution' :)
When they exceed the payed amount of bytes,simply that account won't be in
use anymore :)

Hope this help :)

f2zubac


On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, Thomas Vander Stichele wrote:

 Hi,
 
 I've been asked something I couldn't really give an answer to out of the 
 box.  Someone I know wants to do fair bandwidth sharing over long periods.  
 The period would be related to the provider's capping period ;)
 So, for example, if five people share one connection, and the ISP allows 
 10 GB per month of traffic, each person could only use 2 GB per month, and 
 be effectively turned off when passing that limit.
 
 Now, my question is - has anyone done anything similar ? I'd think that 
 this application would lean more to an approach that just does accounting 
 by the hour,, for example, and turn off net access through firewall rules 
 based on those values.  Also, it would probably have to store intermediate 
 accounting values to disk instead of keep everything in memory.
 
 What do you guys think ?
 
 Thomas
 
 
 -- 
 
 The Dave/Dina Project : future TV today ! - http://davedina.apestaart.org/
 -*-  -*-
 You think I'm scared of girls well maybe
 but I'm not afraid of you
 You want to scare me then you'll
 cling to me no matter what I do
 -*- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -*-
 URGent, the best radio on the Internet - 24/7 ! - http://urgent.rug.ac.be/
 
 ___
 LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
 

___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/



Re: [LARTC] RADIUS? Traffic Accounting and VPN (PPTP)

2002-07-31 Thread Dragan Zubac

Hi,

You can always use pppd (which VPN uses),and radiusclient to do IP
accounting via internal or external radius server.Radius protocol can
account time as well as byte octets,it depends only on You what things
You'd like to account :)

Dragan Zubac


On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Don Gould wrote:

 Hi All,
 
 I'm trying to find the right tools to be able to track the amount of data
 that my users and pulling accross our VPN links.
 
 I've already done a google and hunted thru the Redhat web site but I'm
 really just not sure what I'm looking for.
 
 Could someone give me some links or even the correct terms would be a start.
 
 Cheers DiG
 
 Ask not what your broadband Telcos can do for you...
 ...but what you can do for your broadband community! 
 
 Don Gould Unit 4 / 3 Conroy Street
 CBP Team Leader   Maylands , Perth
 Bowenvale Communications  WA 6051
 www.bvc.com.auAustralia
 Phone + 61 8 9371 7289
 
 

___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/