Re: [LARTC] tc + zebra/quagga
On Sunday 27 March 2005 14:50, you wrote: > Lorin wrote: > > I have some problem with traffic shaping on debian testing. I actually > > posted a full config on the list a while ago but didn't get any answers. > > The problem is that traffic doesn't get into the user classes (~150) when > > I associate a class with a qdisc. I tried sfq, fifo but none works. If I > > dont't associate a qdisc with a class classification occurs well. > > I'm pretty sure the config is ok. Just was wondering if someone has > > already steped into this one. > > This box runs zebra and bgpd as it is a bgp border router. > > I found this post on google which is quite similar to my case: > > http://mailman.isi.edu/pipermail/6bone/2002-May/005420.html. > > > > Thank you. > > This is strange - can you recreate it with a small test script that > doesn't use htbinit way of naming/numbering. > > Andy. It would be quite some work to setup a configuration, there are a lot of hosts that need to be limited. Here is what I have: #---class root - RATE/CEIL=100Mbit /sbin/tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:0010 htb rate 100Mbit /sbin/tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1 htb default 3000 #---class bgp - RATE/CEIL=128Kbit /sbin/tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:0010 classid 1:0050 htb rate 128Kbit ceil 128Kbit prio 0 /sbin/tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:0050 handle 0050 sfq perturb 10 /sbin/tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 100 u32 match ip dst /32 classid 1:0050 /sbin/tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 100 u32 match ip src /32 classid 1:0050 /sbin/tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 100 u32 match ip sport 179 0x classid 1:0050 /sbin/tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 100 u32 match ip dport 179 0x classid 1:0050 #---class management - RATE/CEIL=64Kbit (ssh,icmp) /sbin/tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:0010 classid 1:0500 htb rate 64Kbit ceil 64Kbit prio 1 /sbin/tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:0500 handle 0500 sfq perturb 10 /sbin/tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 100 u32 match ip dport 22 0x classid 1:0500 /sbin/tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 100 u32 match ip sport 22 0x classid 1:0500 /sbin/tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 100 u32 match ip src 83.103.150.50 classid 1:0500 /sbin/tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 100 u32 match ip dst 83.103.150.50 classid 1:0500 /sbin/tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 100 u32 match ip sport 0 0x classid 1:0500 /sbin/tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 100 u32 match ip dport 0 0x classid 1:0500 #---class premium - RATE/CEIL=sum of RATE child classes (the broadband way [tm]) /sbin/tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:0010 classid 1:1000 htb rate 352Kbit ceil 352Kbit prio 2 /sbin/tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:1000 handle 1000 sfq perturb 10 /sbin/tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1000 classid 1:1001 htb rate 32Kbit ceil 64Kbit prio 2 /sbin/tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:1001 handle 1001 sfq perturb 10 /sbin/tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 100 u32 match ip src /32 classid 1:1001 /sbin/tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1000 classid 1:1002 htb rate 32Kbit ceil 64Kbit prio 2 /sbin/tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:1002 handle 1002 sfq perturb 10 /sbin/tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 100 u32 match ip src /32 classid 1:1002 /sbin/tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1000 classid 1:1003 htb rate 32Kbit ceil 64Kbit prio 2 /sbin/tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:1003 handle 1003 sfq perturb 10 /sbin/tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 100 u32 match ip src classid 1:1003 #---class best-effort RATE/CEIL=sum of RATE child classes individual limits just like in premium class #---class default RATE/CEIL=2Kbit /sbin/tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:3000 classid 1:3000 htb rate 2Kbit prio 7 /sbin/tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:3000 handle 3000 sfq perturb 10 If I set the leaf qdisc to 'none' traffice gets classified well; if I use a qdisc in a child class all traffic goes to default. After few tests I managed to isolate the problem (kinndof) - if I use just one class, best-effort for example, and put all filters/qdisc in this one everything works fine. But I really need to separate big clients (premium) from small ones (best-effort) and to shape management/bgp traffic separately from those 2. atm the only separations is made after prio value: bgp 0, management 1, premium 2, best-effort 3 and default 7. Thanks for the help! p.s. I'm working on a romanian translation for LARTC. I have about 1/4 of it till now. If there are any romanians on this list willing to help it would a very nice thing to do for the community. Also translating this great howto it's a study itself so you can get also
Re: [LARTC] tc + zebra/quagga
On Sunday 27 March 2005 14:50, you wrote: > Lorin wrote: > > I have some problem with traffic shaping on debian testing. I actually > > posted a full config on the list a while ago but didn't get any answers. > > The problem is that traffic doesn't get into the user classes (~150) when > > I associate a class with a qdisc. I tried sfq, fifo but none works. If I > > dont't associate a qdisc with a class classification occurs well. > > I'm pretty sure the config is ok. Just was wondering if someone has > > already steped into this one. > > This box runs zebra and bgpd as it is a bgp border router. > > I found this post on google which is quite similar to my case: > > http://mailman.isi.edu/pipermail/6bone/2002-May/005420.html. > > > > Thank you. > > This is strange - can you recreate it with a small test script that > doesn't use htbinit way of naming/numbering. > > Andy. It would be quite some work to setup a configuration, there are a lot of hosts that need to be limited. Here is what I have: #---class root - RATE/CEIL=100Mbit /sbin/tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:0010 htb rate 100Mbit /sbin/tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1 htb default 3000 #---class bgp - RATE/CEIL=128Kbit /sbin/tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:0010 classid 1:0050 htb rate 128Kbit ceil 128Kbit prio 0 /sbin/tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:0050 handle 0050 sfq perturb 10 /sbin/tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 100 u32 match ip dst /32 classid 1:0050 /sbin/tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 100 u32 match ip src /32 classid 1:0050 /sbin/tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 100 u32 match ip sport 179 0x classid 1:0050 /sbin/tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 100 u32 match ip dport 179 0x classid 1:0050 #---class management - RATE/CEIL=64Kbit (ssh,icmp) /sbin/tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:0010 classid 1:0500 htb rate 64Kbit ceil 64Kbit prio 1 /sbin/tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:0500 handle 0500 sfq perturb 10 /sbin/tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 100 u32 match ip dport 22 0x classid 1:0500 /sbin/tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 100 u32 match ip sport 22 0x classid 1:0500 /sbin/tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 100 u32 match ip src 83.103.150.50 classid 1:0500 /sbin/tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 100 u32 match ip dst 83.103.150.50 classid 1:0500 /sbin/tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 100 u32 match ip sport 0 0x classid 1:0500 /sbin/tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 100 u32 match ip dport 0 0x classid 1:0500 #---class premium - RATE/CEIL=sum of RATE child classes (the broadband way [tm]) /sbin/tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:0010 classid 1:1000 htb rate 352Kbit ceil 352Kbit prio 2 /sbin/tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:1000 handle 1000 sfq perturb 10 /sbin/tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1000 classid 1:1001 htb rate 32Kbit ceil 64Kbit prio 2 /sbin/tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:1001 handle 1001 sfq perturb 10 /sbin/tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 100 u32 match ip src /32 classid 1:1001 /sbin/tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1000 classid 1:1002 htb rate 32Kbit ceil 64Kbit prio 2 /sbin/tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:1002 handle 1002 sfq perturb 10 /sbin/tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 100 u32 match ip src /32 classid 1:1002 /sbin/tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1000 classid 1:1003 htb rate 32Kbit ceil 64Kbit prio 2 /sbin/tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:1003 handle 1003 sfq perturb 10 /sbin/tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 100 u32 match ip src classid 1:1003 #---class best-effort RATE/CEIL=sum of RATE child classes individual limits just like in premium class #---class default RATE/CEIL=2Kbit /sbin/tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:3000 classid 1:3000 htb rate 2Kbit prio 7 /sbin/tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:3000 handle 3000 sfq perturb 10 If I set the leaf qdisc to 'none' traffice gets classified well; if I use a qdisc in a child class all traffic goes to default. After few tests I managed to isolate the problem (kinndof) - if I use just one class, best-effort for example, and put all filters/qdisc in this one everything works fine. But I really need to separate big clients (premium) from small ones (best-effort) and to shape management/bgp traffic separately from those 2. atm the only separations is made after prio value: bgp 0, management 1, premium 2, best-effort 3 and default 7. Thanks for the help! p.s. I'm working on a romanian translation for LARTC. I have about 1/4 of it till now. If there are any romanians on this list willing to help it would a very nice thing to do for the community. Also translating this great howto it's a study itself so you can get also
Re: [LARTC] tc + zebra/quagga
On Sunday 27 March 2005 14:50, you wrote: > Lorin wrote: > > I have some problem with traffic shaping on debian testing. I actually > > posted a full config on the list a while ago but didn't get any answers. > > The problem is that traffic doesn't get into the user classes (~150) when > > I associate a class with a qdisc. I tried sfq, fifo but none works. If I > > dont't associate a qdisc with a class classification occurs well. > > I'm pretty sure the config is ok. Just was wondering if someone has > > already steped into this one. > > This box runs zebra and bgpd as it is a bgp border router. > > I found this post on google which is quite similar to my case: > > http://mailman.isi.edu/pipermail/6bone/2002-May/005420.html. > > > > Thank you. > > This is strange - can you recreate it with a small test script that > doesn't use htbinit way of naming/numbering. > > Andy. It would be quite some work to setup a configuration, there are a lot of hosts that need to be limited. Here is what I have: #---class root - RATE/CEIL=100Mbit /sbin/tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:0010 htb rate 100Mbit /sbin/tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1 htb default 3000 #---class bgp - RATE/CEIL=128Kbit /sbin/tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:0010 classid 1:0050 htb rate 128Kbit ceil 128Kbit prio 0 /sbin/tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:0050 handle 0050 sfq perturb 10 /sbin/tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 100 u32 match ip dst /32 classid 1:0050 /sbin/tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 100 u32 match ip src /32 classid 1:0050 /sbin/tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 100 u32 match ip sport 179 0x classid 1:0050 /sbin/tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 100 u32 match ip dport 179 0x classid 1:0050 #---class management - RATE/CEIL=64Kbit (ssh,icmp) /sbin/tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:0010 classid 1:0500 htb rate 64Kbit ceil 64Kbit prio 1 /sbin/tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:0500 handle 0500 sfq perturb 10 /sbin/tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 100 u32 match ip dport 22 0x classid 1:0500 /sbin/tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 100 u32 match ip sport 22 0x classid 1:0500 /sbin/tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 100 u32 match ip src 83.103.150.50 classid 1:0500 /sbin/tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 100 u32 match ip dst 83.103.150.50 classid 1:0500 /sbin/tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 100 u32 match ip sport 0 0x classid 1:0500 /sbin/tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 100 u32 match ip dport 0 0x classid 1:0500 #---class premium - RATE/CEIL=sum of RATE child classes (the broadband way [tm]) /sbin/tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:0010 classid 1:1000 htb rate 352Kbit ceil 352Kbit prio 2 /sbin/tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:1000 handle 1000 sfq perturb 10 /sbin/tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1000 classid 1:1001 htb rate 32Kbit ceil 64Kbit prio 2 /sbin/tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:1001 handle 1001 sfq perturb 10 /sbin/tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 100 u32 match ip src /32 classid 1:1001 /sbin/tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1000 classid 1:1002 htb rate 32Kbit ceil 64Kbit prio 2 /sbin/tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:1002 handle 1002 sfq perturb 10 /sbin/tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 100 u32 match ip src /32 classid 1:1002 /sbin/tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1000 classid 1:1003 htb rate 32Kbit ceil 64Kbit prio 2 /sbin/tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:1003 handle 1003 sfq perturb 10 /sbin/tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 100 u32 match ip src classid 1:1003 #---class best-effort RATE/CEIL=sum of RATE child classes individual limits just like in premium class #---class default RATE/CEIL=2Kbit /sbin/tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:3000 classid 1:3000 htb rate 2Kbit prio 7 /sbin/tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:3000 handle 3000 sfq perturb 10 If I set the leaf qdisc to 'none' traffice gets classified well; if I use a qdisc in a child class all traffic goes to default. After few tests I managed to isolate the problem (kinndof) - if I use just one class, best-effort for example, and put all filters/qdisc in this one everything works fine. But I really need to separate big clients (premium) from small ones (best-effort) and to shape management/bgp traffic separately from those 2. atm the only separations is made after prio value: bgp 0, management 1, premium 2, best-effort 3 and default 7. Thanks for the help! p.s. I'm working on a romanian translation for LARTC. I have about 1/4 of it till now. If there are any romanians on this list willing to help it would a very nice thing to do for the community. Also translating this great howto it's a study itself so you can get also
[LARTC] tc + zebra/quagga
I have some problem with traffic shaping on debian testing. I actually posted a full config on the list a while ago but didn't get any answers. The problem is that traffic doesn't get into the user classes (~150) when I associate a class with a qdisc. I tried sfq, fifo but none works. If I dont't associate a qdisc with a class classification occurs well. I'm pretty sure the config is ok. Just was wondering if someone has already steped into this one. This box runs zebra and bgpd as it is a bgp border router. I found this post on google which is quite similar to my case: http://mailman.isi.edu/pipermail/6bone/2002-May/005420.html. Thank you. -- + Lorin + I tought I taw a putty cat...I did! I did taw a putty cat! + http://si-bemol.ro ___ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
Re: [LARTC] htb.init issues
On Monday 14 March 2005 09:42, Lorin wrote: Hi again! Sorry for the repost but our provider's mail server was down for a few hours and I probably missed some replies for this. Thank you, > Hi! > Here's what I want: > > root class 0010 > premium parent class 1000 >premium child classes 1xyz > best-effort parent class 2000 > best-effort child classes 2xyz > default class 3000 > > Here's how I do it: > > eth1: > DEFAULT=3000 > > eth1-0010.root: > RATE=100Mbit > LEAF=sfq > > eth1-0010:1000.premium > CEIL=352Kbit > RATE=352Kbit > PRIO=2 > LEAF=sfq > > eth1-0010:1000:1xyx.child1 > CEIL=32Kbit > RATE=8Kbit > PRIO=3 > LEAF=sfq > RULE=, > > eth1-0010:2000.best-effort > CEIL=500Kbit > RATE=500Kbit > PRIO=3 > LEAF=sfq > > eth1-0010:2000:2xyz.child1 > CEIL=16Kbit > RATE=8Kbit > PRIO=2 > LEAF=sfq > RULE=, > > eth1-0010:3000.default > RATE=2Kbit > PRIO=7 > > An output from tc commands generated by the script: > > /sbin/tc qdisc del dev eth0 root > /sbin/tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1 htb default 3000 > > /sbin/tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:0010 classid 1:1000 htb rate 352Kbit > ceil 352Kbit prio 2 > /sbin/tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:1000 handle 1000 sfq perturb 10 > > /sbin/tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1000 classid 1:1001 htb rate 32Kbit > ceil 64Kbit prio 2 > /sbin/tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 100 u32 match ip > dst /32 classid 1:1001 > sbin/tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1000 classid 1:1002 htb rate 32Kbit > ceil 64Kbit prio 2 > /sbin/tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 100 u32 match ip > dst /32 classid 1:1002 > > > /sbin/tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:0010 classid 1:2000 htb rate 500Kbit > ceil 500Kbit prio 3 > /sbin/tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:2000 handle 2000 sfq perturb 10 > > /sbin/tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:2000 classid 1:2001 htb rate 8Kbit > ceil 32Kbit prio 3 > /sbin/tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:2001 handle 2001 sfq perturb 10 > /sbin/tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 100 u32 match ip > dst /32 classid 1:2001 > /sbin/tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:2000 classid 1:2002 htb rate 8Kbit > ceil 32Kbit prio 3 > /sbin/tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:2002 handle 2002 sfq perturb 10 > /sbin/tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 100 u32 match ip > dst /32 classid 1:2002 > > /sbin/tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:0010 classid 1:3000 htb rate 2Kbit > prio 7 /sbin/tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:3000 handle 3000 sfq perturb 10 > > The problem is that all traffic goes to default class and I > can't figure out why. It seems like u32 doesn't match the ip addresses I > configured... > I use Debian Testing, with required modules sch_* compiled in kernel > (2.6.9). > > 10x > > p.s. I'm a tc newbie... -- + Lorin + I tought I taw a putty cat...I did! I did taw a putty cat! + http://si-bemol.ro ___ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
[LARTC] htb.init issues
Hi! Here's what I want: root class 0010 premium parent class 1000 premium child classes 1xyz best-effort parent class 2000 best-effort child classes 2xyz default class 3000 Here's how I do it: eth1: DEFAULT=3000 eth1-0010.root: RATE=100Mbit LEAF=sfq eth1-0010:1000.premium CEIL=352Kbit RATE=352Kbit PRIO=2 LEAF=sfq eth1-0010:1000:1xyx.child1 CEIL=32Kbit RATE=8Kbit PRIO=3 LEAF=sfq RULE=, eth1-0010:2000.best-effort CEIL=500Kbit RATE=500Kbit PRIO=3 LEAF=sfq eth1-0010:2000:2xyz.child1 CEIL=16Kbit RATE=8Kbit PRIO=2 LEAF=sfq RULE=, eth1-0010:3000.default RATE=2Kbit PRIO=7 An output from tc commands generated by the script: /sbin/tc qdisc del dev eth0 root /sbin/tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1 htb default 3000 /sbin/tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:0010 classid 1:1000 htb rate 352Kbit ceil 352Kbit prio 2 /sbin/tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:1000 handle 1000 sfq perturb 10 /sbin/tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1000 classid 1:1001 htb rate 32Kbit ceil 64Kbit prio 2 /sbin/tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 100 u32 match ip dst /32 classid 1:1001 sbin/tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1000 classid 1:1002 htb rate 32Kbit ceil 64Kbit prio 2 /sbin/tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 100 u32 match ip dst /32 classid 1:1002 /sbin/tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:0010 classid 1:2000 htb rate 500Kbit ceil 500Kbit prio 3 /sbin/tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:2000 handle 2000 sfq perturb 10 /sbin/tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:2000 classid 1:2001 htb rate 8Kbit ceil 32Kbit prio 3 /sbin/tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:2001 handle 2001 sfq perturb 10 /sbin/tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 100 u32 match ip dst /32 classid 1:2001 /sbin/tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:2000 classid 1:2002 htb rate 8Kbit ceil 32Kbit prio 3 /sbin/tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:2002 handle 2002 sfq perturb 10 /sbin/tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 100 u32 match ip dst /32 classid 1:2002 /sbin/tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:0010 classid 1:3000 htb rate 2Kbit prio 7 /sbin/tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:3000 handle 3000 sfq perturb 10 The problem is that all traffic goes to default class and I can't figure out why. It seems like u32 doesn't match the ip addresses I configured... I use Debian Testing, with required modules sch_* compiled in kernel (2.6.9). 10x p.s. I'm a tc newbie... -- + Lorin + I tought I taw a putty cat...I did! I did taw a putty cat! + http://si-bemol.ro ___ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
