route add -net 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 br2
once i have that, i apply the following
tc qdisc add dev br2 root handle 3: htb default 11
tc class add dev br2 parent 3: classid 3:1 htb rate 10mbit
tc class add dev br2 parent 3:1 classid 3:10 htb rate 9990kbit ceil
10mbit
tc class add dev br2 parent 3:1 classid 3:11 htb rate 10kbit ceil
25kbit
tc qdisc add dev br2 parent 3:10 handle 30: sfq
tc qdisc add dev br2 parent 3:11 handle 31: sfq
tc filter add dev br2 protocol ip parent 3: handle 5 fw classid 3:10
ebtables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth2 -p IPV4 -d 00:30:65:17:71:8f
-j mark --set-mark 5
please note that the ebtables is being applied to eth2.
when i set this up, all traffic destined for 00:30:65:17:71:8f, i
think, is being marked as the --Lc count is increasing. however, when
i do a
tc -s qdisc show dev br2
it looks like all the packets are going into queue 11, which is the
10kbit class.
if somebody could shed some light on this problem, i would greatly
appreciate it.
r
--__--__--
Message: 4
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2003 21:20:24 -0500 (COT)
From: Randolph Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Damjan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Lartc List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [LARTC] (no subject)
Seem you want to achieve somekind of concave service curve but with
terrible times, maybe you could try to do it some way the HFSC queuer
does but definitly not in a script or using HTB, HTB uses a linear service
curve as a Token Bucket actually does, you should try using the linux port
of the HFSC made by Alex Goldney you can find further info here
http://members.optushome.com.au/agoldney/
HFSC is intented for delay bounding, but I think you could do some strange
arragments to achieve what u say. Tell me if u get it.
You're not drunk if you can lie on the floor without holding on.
-- Dean Martin
last night.
--__--__--
Message: 5
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2003 08:03:46 +0530
From: Payal Rathod [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [LARTC] routing query
Hi,
I have a simple question. I asked a friend about it but he was also not
clear. So, I thought of mailing the list.
I have a linux box (RH 7.2) which will have 2 net cards. I have 2 types
of connections to that box. One RF at eth0 and 1 ISDN at eth1.
Now I told 10 people from the company to give eth1 as their default
gateway and the rest as eth0. Ok, so far? Now my understanding that with
the routing table below, all traffic coming to eth0 will be routed thru'
RF router and all traffic coming to eth1 will be routed through ISDN
router. Am I right? S, if ISDN fails only 10 people will suffer but the
rest can continue using RF line. Same case with RF line, if it fails the
10 people can use ISDN without any glitch. This is no load balancing
network. Just a simple routing decision.
I have,
route add default gw ISDN router ip dev eth1
route add default gw RF router ip dev eth0
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse
Iface 127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0
0 lo 125.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0
0 eth1 125.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0
0 eth1 default 203.124.123.111 0.0.0.0 UG0 0
0 eth0 default 125.125.125.3 0.0.0.0 UG0 0
0 eth1 default * 0.0.0.0 U 0 0
0 eth0
Can anyone comment whether I am right in my analysis?
My friend's comments are given below,
| I still say that should be necessary. I believe you need to echo 0
| at some files found by /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/*/send_redirects.
| Otherwise devices won't route through your box, they'll be
| redirected straight to one of the routers (at random, as far as I
| know).
With warm regards,
-Payal
--
Regards,
Manish Singh
Software Engineer
Consilnet India Pvt Ltd
Ph: 011 26868293/94/95
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
