Re: [LARTC] LARTC Wiki
I think that wiki is not the same thing, and...after all...is not the LARTC official wiki... Isn't the LARTC mailing list more popular? I think it is...and a wiki is the way to go...imho Alex Samad wrote: On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 03:53:23PM +, Andrew Beverley wrote: I'm not aware of one, and I think it's an excellent idea. There's some great software available for LARTC, and some of the documentation is very good, but unfortunately it's all a bit disparate. A wiki would be a great start. I'd be happy to host one and transfer stuff into it unless someone else has a better idea/offer? Andy Beverley Last time there was talk of a wiki this address was given http://linux-net.osdl.org/index.php/Main_Page This link below gives the details on how to setup a multi link connection http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html Alex On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 12:46 -0300, Marco Aurelio wrote: Hi all, Since the mail list receives a lot of repeated subjects (for example: "i have two adsl lines..."), maybe these specific issues should be treated on the LARTC Guide, or maybe if we had an wiki? Is there a LARTC Wiki? If not, what do you think about creating one? Thanks -- Marco ___ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc ___ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc ___ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc ___ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
Re: [LARTC] heavy VBR traffic with HTB
Ed W wrote: > Andy Furniss wrote: > >> Tiago Bruno Espírito Santo Silva wrote: >> >>> Hello! >>> >>> I made a simple configuration with HTB, 10% http and 90% Video, where >>> http can share the available bandwidth left from video. >>> >>> But :(... i think HTB it's not very fast and it can't adapt quickly to >>> the great variation of the MPEG 4 VBR (700M film), and some times it >>> jerks a bit in great variations of bandwidth. I'm making a download to >>> have always 100% bandwidth utilization (or near). This setup is running >>> on a controlled home lan. >>> >>> Have any one tried something like that? am i missing some thing? >>> >>> Please some one tell me something. >> >> >> >> You rates/ceils are probably too high you need to allow for overheads >> - seeing your script would help. > > > > Actually he said he ws *downloading*, and so he probably doesn't have > control over the incoming stream. > > Remember that you can only really control outgoing rates properly - > incoming streams you control indirectly and all you can do is ignore > the sender for a while and hope he stops sending you stuff so > quickly... So this is probably your problem - HTB reacts instantly, > but the sender keeps sending stuff for perhaps several seconds until > you stop answering him and then backs off - there is a reaction lag > and there is not much you can do about it really. > > Ed W Thanks for the responses! Well i'm out this days but i'll try to test again when i go back home, I'll send the scripts later this week. I have 3 PCs, something like this: A<===>R<===>B Where R is the router with 2 ethernet cards...so i have in A a http server (tcp) and VLC streaming (udp) to B, i think i can control the outgoing traffic from A to B in the "R"outer. You are saying to me that with this configuration if the rates/ceils are well chosen, the video streaming must work with no jerks even if the bandwidth is at 100% (or near). Thanks for your help Tiago ___ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
[LARTC] heavy VBR traffic with HTB
Hello! I made a simple configuration with HTB, 10% http and 90% Video, where http can share the available bandwidth left from video. But :(... i think HTB it's not very fast and it can't adapt quickly to the great variation of the MPEG 4 VBR (700M film), and some times it jerks a bit in great variations of bandwidth. I'm making a download to have always 100% bandwidth utilization (or near). This setup is running on a controlled home lan. Have any one tried something like that? am i missing some thing? Please some one tell me something. thanks Tiago PS: sorry my English :( ___ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
Re: [LARTC] shaping without delay
Minimize having a good CPU...every thing that travels lost some time...even in the wire or in the air :) or in the vacum the comunications with the MARS have biig delays :) Stef Coene wrote: On Saturday 30 October 2004 23:13, Avidianto Widodo wrote: Hi, How can I configure shaping bandwidth on htb/cbq without delay or latency? Please give some example. You can not shape without delay or latency. You can only try to minimize the delay or latency for certain connections. Stef ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
