Re: [LARTC] List fault?

[Victor Julien]

On 05/04/2011 10:15 PM, Ruben Rögels wrote:
> Am 04.05.2011 21:24, schrieb Grant Taylor:
>> On 05/04/11 13:37, Radu Oprisan wrote:
>>> I will try to contact LARTC in order to ask them for permission to
>>> take over this one.
>>
>> (I'll make this pitch again.)
>>
>> Does any one have any objections to (re)configuring the mailing list
>> so that it sets the Reply-To header so that replies are directed back
>> to the mailing list (as a discussion list)?
>>
>> All in favor?
>>
>> Any one against?
>>
>>
>>
>> Grant. . . .
>> ___
>> LARTC mailing list
>> LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
>> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
> 
> Please, do so.

Maybe it's an idea to use LibreList[1] or Sourceforge or something?
Saves the trouble of admin and fighting spammers.

Cheers,
Victor

[1] http://librelist.com/

-- 
-
Victor Julien
http://www.inliniac.net/
PGP: http://www.inliniac.net/victorjulien.asc
-

___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

Re: [LARTC] Writing rules direct to Kernel

[Victor Julien]

Liviu Faciu wrote:
Hi,
I'm interested to write rules direct in Kernel space memory and not to
execute the tc command. Have anyone done this before ? Any ideas ?
Sources ?
Thank you,
Liviu

Hi Liviu,
take a look at this:
http://www.coverfire.com/lql/
i have no experience with it, but it looks promising...
Regards,
Victor
___
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/