I've tried with iproute and it works now !
commands for A:
ip tunnel add mode ipip tunl1 local IP_A remote IP_B
ip addr add dev net1 local virtual-IP_A remote virtual-IP_B
ip link set net1 up
Same on B.

And then from A i'm able to ping virtual-IP_B.

It seems one can not use tunl0 as a tunnel name, is it true ?
I think it will be a good thing to add to the section 5.2 of the LARTC HowTo
the
way to do a tunnel with the 'ip' commands and to specify that new_tunnel.o is
only in old kernel. But that's perhaps already in a TODO list...

Francois


> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> here is the config:
> (i cut the 192.168. part of IP addr)
>
> -----------------A-----------------B-----------------C
>              3.3   5.3         5.4   4.4         4.1
>
> on A:
> ifconfig tunl0 192.168.3.3 pointopoint 192.168.5.4
> route add -net 192.168.4.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 dev tunl0
> on B:
> ifconfig tunl0 192.168.4.4 pointopoint 192.168.5.3
> route add -net 192.168.3.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 dev tunl0
>
> From A i can't ping C. Traceroute shows that packets doesn't even reach
> B.
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Reply via email to