[LARTC] Imq implimentation
hello all, i intend to implimentJiri Fojtasek's imq implimentation here http://hyperfighter.jinak.cz/qos/ on my Linux shaper for production use,I will like to ask if people have implimented it and find it stable and useful as stated in the site. My bandwidth manager will have 3 interfaces , eth0 -internet(live ip, bridged with eth1), eth1(live ip bridged w eth0), eth2 -lan(local ip) . eth0 and eth1 arebridge ports. I have implimented a shaper over bridged interface before and it is ok.But i was using just 2 interfaces then, now I want to use 3 interfaces. I have read in the lartc that to impliment multiple interface BWM with linux, one must use an IMQ device- I do not know if there is another method? So if anybody has implimented the scenario in the Jirii's site or the one i described above using other method(s) other that imq,may he intimate me with a sample script to get started as I am yet to fully understand the internal workings of imq device. Thanks, IbrahimT Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers!
[LARTC] How to configure tc with burstable bandwidth
Hello all, I have a qos system that is working fine with my present dedicated bandwidth.Now I need to move on to another ISP provider that gives me opportunity to burst my bandwidth when there is less contention. I want to incorporate the bursting advantage in to my script but do not know how. Please , can somebody help with what I need to do to make this possible ? Thanks. -Ibrahim __ Do you Yahoo!? Vote for the stars of Yahoo!'s next ad campaign! http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/yahoo/votelifeengine/ ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Re: [LARTC] QoS for Voip.
Hi, the hint from Martin A Brown which I am experimenting without regret yet is that you shoul decrease the queue lenght to say 30 from the default 100 and also reduce the MTU(MAX. TRANSFER UNIT) to the size of typical voice traffic say 256 using ip link set dev eth0 qlen 30 ip link set dev eth0 mtu 1000 Hope it helps. Ibrahim T. --- Alessandro Ren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been using a altered version of the wshaper script to priorize voip traffic for my customers. I'd like to know if someone in the list has any tips on QoS for voip, if someone has done some experimentation. I am using HTB and if someone on the LAN uses a p2p program, I started to noticed in the voip, with cuts, jitter and lag. If a reserve a fixed amount of bandwitdh not letting anyonbe borrow, it works fine, but then if noone is using voip, I have bandwidth going to waste. I think I need some fine tunning oin the HTB parameters, but I am not sure sure about that. Any indeas? __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
[LARTC] Shaping using both public and private Ip addresss on same linux box
I have a qos system that is currently shaping (down/up) using public ip address on eth0 and eth1 -eth0 faces the internet.What I want to do is similar to what jiri fojtasek ( http://hyperfighter.jinak.cz/qos ) in his imq implementation example. But in my case , i do not want to use imq but rather attach the 3rd NIC eth2 that will shape traffic originating/destined to my local LAN -192.168.0.0/24. wHAT i find challenging is how to construct the tc scripts between the interface eth0 and eth2 taking care of up/down as well , without conflicting with the public aspect. A sample script will be of great help. Ibrahim T __ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
