[LARTC] Difference between tc reported rate and IPTraf Rate
Title: [LARTC] Difference between tc reported rate and IPTraf Rate Trevor, Thanks for pointing out one of the possible reasons for the difference. However, in this case I have also tried using the local display and got similar results ( though the difference reduces a bit). Thanks, Rajesh >Hey pal, >What about the overhead part to create the display that flows between>the internet gateway(Machine you are monitoring) and your machine???.>TrevorOn Mon, 2003-07-14 at 14:35, Rajesh Srivastava wrote:> I am using HTB+IMQ on an Ethernet bridge and tc for statistics> reporting.> > I am finding that tc reported rate is about 5-10% less than that> reported by IPTraf for the same traffic.> > Has anyone observed this before? Which is more accurate?> > Rajesh -- ( >- LINUX, It's all about CHOICE -< )/~\ __ [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ /~\| \) / Pre Sales Consultant - Red Hat \ (/ ||_|_ \ 9820349221(M) | 22881326(O) / _|_| \_______/ Previous message: [LARTC] Difference between tc reported rate and IPTraf Rate Next message: [Re: [LARTC] marking in OUTPUT --mangle; locally generated packets and route lookup - broken?] Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Re: [LARTC] Difference between tc reported rate and IPTraf Rate
Hey pal, What about the overhead part to create the display that flows between the internet gateway(Machine you are monitoring) and your machine???. Trevor On Mon, 2003-07-14 at 14:35, Rajesh Srivastava wrote: > I am using HTB+IMQ on an Ethernet bridge and tc for statistics > reporting. > > I am finding that tc reported rate is about 5-10% less than that > reported by IPTraf for the same traffic. > > Has anyone observed this before? Which is more accurate? > > Rajesh -- ( >-LINUX, It's all about CHOICE -< ) /~\__[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ /~\ | \) / Pre Sales Consultant - Red Hat \ (/ | |_|_ \9820349221(M) | 22881326(O) / _|_| \___/ ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
[LARTC] Difference between tc reported rate and IPTraf Rate
I am using HTB+IMQ on an Ethernet bridge and tc for statistics reporting. I am finding that tc reported rate is about 5-10% less than that reported by IPTraf for the same traffic. Has anyone observed this before? Which is more accurate? Rajesh