Re: [LARTC] Ethloop
On Sunday 07 September 2003 05:25, Yves Bergeron wrote: Hi, This is my scenario I have a 100mbit for 400 routes and the rest of Internet is at 2mbit # #1:1 # / \ #1:2 1:12 # / \ # 1:10 1:11 tc qdisc del dev lo root handle 1: htb default 10 tc qdisc add dev lo root handle 1: htb default 10 tc class add dev lo parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 100mbit quantum 1500 tc class add dev lo parent 1:1 classid 1:2 htb rate 1950kbit tc class add dev lo parent 1:2 classid 1:10 htb rate 1500kbit ceil 1900kbit tc class add dev lo parent 1:2 classid 1:11 htb rate 100kbit ceil 1000kbit tc class add dev lo parent 1:1 classid 1:12 htb rate 98mbit quantum 1500 tc qdisc add dev lo parent 1:10 handle 10: sfq perturb 10 tc qdisc add dev lo parent 1:11 handle 11: sfq perturb 10 tc qdisc add dev lo parent 1:12 handle 12: sfq perturb 10 Is my class Ok ? I want to make simulation with Ethloop, How can I known which flow correspond to which classid ? I use ethloop also and 0x10010 is class 1:10, 0x10011 is class 1:11. (ethloop is a tool that can be used to test htb, see htb home page). Example : tc qdisc del dev lo root ifconfig lo mtu 1500 tc qdisc add dev lo root handle 1: htb default 10 TC=tc class add dev lo parent $TC 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 100kbps $TC 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 40kbps ceil 100kbps $TC 1:1 classid 1:11 htb rate 60kbps ceil 100kbps tc qdisc add dev lo parent 1:10 pfifo tc qdisc add dev lo parent 1:11 pfifo 0 i 0 lo 0 i 1 lo 0 P 0 0x10010 0 P 1 0x10011 0 S 0 1500 0 S 1 1500 # start all flows 0 R 0 120k 0 R 1 120k 12000 X 0 0 Stef -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using Linux as bandwidth manager http://www.docum.org/ #lartc @ irc.oftc.net ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
[LARTC] Ethloop
Hi, This is my scenario I have a 100mbit for 400 routes and the rest of Internet is at 2mbit # #1:1 # / \ #1:2 1:12 # / \ # 1:10 1:11 tc qdisc del dev lo root handle 1: htb default 10 tc qdisc add dev lo root handle 1: htb default 10 tc class add dev lo parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 100mbit quantum 1500 tc class add dev lo parent 1:1 classid 1:2 htb rate 1950kbit tc class add dev lo parent 1:2 classid 1:10 htb rate 1500kbit ceil 1900kbit tc class add dev lo parent 1:2 classid 1:11 htb rate 100kbit ceil 1000kbit tc class add dev lo parent 1:1 classid 1:12 htb rate 98mbit quantum 1500 tc qdisc add dev lo parent 1:10 handle 10: sfq perturb 10 tc qdisc add dev lo parent 1:11 handle 11: sfq perturb 10 tc qdisc add dev lo parent 1:12 handle 12: sfq perturb 10 Is my class Ok ? I want to make simulation with Ethloop, How can I known which flow correspond to which classid ? # lo will be used to TX and RX 0 i 0 lo 0 i 1 lo 0 i 2 lo Thank you Yves Bergeron [EMAIL PROTECTED] == ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Re: [LARTC] Ethloop again and 4 level tree ???
Thank you for your attention, my web page is on www.cs.dal.ca/~tong 3 experiments were attached. Best Regards, Patrick Tong On Sun, 9 Jun 2002, King Yung Tong wrote: Dear Martin, Hello again, Thank you for you help last time. I think I understand the solution form you and Stef, but when come to ethloop, the result is not like this. I repost the question, I am pleased if you can give me a quick fix of the problem? Sorry to bother you. I try to create final checkfor htb, and still found the same problem. 1:1 (ceil 1500kbps) / \ (ceil 800kbps) 1:2 1:8 (ceil 700kbps) /\ \ 1:4 1:121:14 / \ (prio 0) 1:10 1:11 (prio 1) The tree under 1:2 is almost the same as you example and is working. And I try to build a larger tree (4 levels) and I would like to do following: class 1:14 is completed isolated even no traffic, the BW will not borow. class 1:12 is empty all the time. class 1:10 is prio 0 and class 1:11 is prio 1 1. My understanding is 1:8 and 1:2 are isolated because of ceil and will not borrow? 2. Since 1:12 is always empty, it can borrow the excess to tree 1:4 and 1:10 will get all the BW wiht prio 0. But in my case, the prio parameter seems to be not working well. It will give BW to both 1:10 and 1:11.The result I got using Ethloop is not like that. I try to start 1:10 at 300k, 1:11 at 100k, since 1:4 parent ceil is 800bps remind will be 400k. At time 10s, I put 1:10 at 900k and 1:11 at 900k, and I think the 400kbs excess will all go to 1:10 and make the flow 1:10 be 700kbs ( 1:4 ceil ). From the ethloop result, 1:10 from 30 go to 50. (equal sharing) 1:11 form 10 go to 30. (eqaul sharing) Do you think the problem is on HTB script or ethloop script or both My HTB: echo sim7 can do the priority BW echo Clean all the tc setup ./tc qdisc del dev lo root ./tc qdisc add dev lo root handle 1: htb default 12 ./tc class add dev lo parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 1500kbps ceil 1500kbps echo AF and BE ./tc class add dev lo parent 1:1 classid 1:2 htb rate 100kbps ceil 800kbps ./tc class add dev lo parent 1:2 classid 1:4 htb rate 100nbps ceil 800kbps ./tc class add dev lo parent 1:2 classid 1:10 htb rate 300kbps ceil 800kbps prio 0 ./tc class add dev lo parent 1:2 classid 1:11 htb rate 100kbps ceil 800kbps prio 1 ./tc class add dev lo parent 1:1 classid 1:12 htb rate 100kbps ceil 800kbps echo EF ./tc class add dev lo parent 1:1 classid 1:8 htb rate 100kbps ceil 700kbps ./tc class add dev lo parent 1:8 classid 1:14 htb rate 100kbps ceil 700kbps echo qdisc for AF and BE ./tc qdisc add dev lo parent 1:10 handle 20: pfifo limit 5 ./tc qdisc add dev lo parent 1:11 handle 30: pfifo limit 5 ./tc qdisc add dev lo parent 1:12 handle 40: sfq perturb 10 echo qdisc EF ./tc qdisc add dev lo parent 1:14 handle 50: sfq perturb 10 My testcase: # set simulation packet size to 1k 0 S 0 1k 0 S 1 1k 0 S 2 1k 0 S 3 1k # flow 0 AF, flow 1 BE, flow 2 excess, flow 3 EF 0 P 0 0x10010 0 P 1 0x10011 0 P 2 0x10012 0 P 3 0x10014 # start all flow at defined rate 0 R 0 300k 0 R 1 100k 0 R 2 0 0 R 3 700k # AE/BE independent of EF # AE and BE flow higher than normal excess ---Both will get BW 1R 0 900k 1R 1 900k # AE and BE back to normal excess -- Go back to original case and try again 15000R 0 300k 15000R 1 100k # BE flow higher than normal excess ---no prio flow, allow lower prio to get BW 2R 1 900k # AF flow higher than normal ---flow for low prio, both will get BW 25000R 0 900k # EF flow higher than normal 3 R 3 900k 35000X 00 Result: 0.5 231444 231444 0 0 77383 77383 0 0 0 0 0 0 540271 478572 40 0 1.0 278479 278479 0 0 92882 92882 0 0 0 0 0 0 609124 583719 61 0 1.5 298901 298901 0 0 100509 100509 0 0 0 0 0 0 615354 611911 62 0 2.0 302205 302205 0 0 101279 101279 0 0 0 0 0 0 617530 617379 63 0 2.5 305878 305878 0 0 102361 102361 0 0 0 0 0 0 616506 616471 63 0 3.0 304599 304599 0 0 102921 102921 0 0 0 0 0 0 618702 618073 63 0 3.5 307264 307264 0 0 102751 102751 0 0 0 0 0 0 618239 617715 63 0 4.0 309582 309582 0 0 103272 103272 0 0 0 0 0 0 620044 619920 63 0 4.5 309559 309559 0 0 103205 103205 0 0 0 0 0 0 619327 619298 63 0 5.0 304899 304899 0 0 102930 102930 0 0 0 0 0 0 621407 619538 63 0 5.5 307757 307757 0 0 102893 102893 0 0 0 0 0 0 618269 617825 63 0 6.0 307659 307659 0 0 102626 102626 0 0 0 0 0 0 615972 615867 63 0 6.5 308994
Re: [LARTC] Ethloop again and 4 level tree ???
Hello Martin, Any comment for the graph in my web site? Pat On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, King Yung Tong wrote: Thank you for your attention, my web page is on www.cs.dal.ca/~tong 3 experiments were attached. Best Regards, Patrick Tong On Sun, 9 Jun 2002, King Yung Tong wrote: Dear Martin, Hello again, Thank you for you help last time. I think I understand the solution form you and Stef, but when come to ethloop, the result is not like this. I repost the question, I am pleased if you can give me a quick fix of the problem? Sorry to bother you. I try to create final checkfor htb, and still found the same problem. 1:1 (ceil 1500kbps) / \ (ceil 800kbps) 1:2 1:8 (ceil 700kbps) /\ \ 1:4 1:121:14 / \ (prio 0) 1:10 1:11 (prio 1) The tree under 1:2 is almost the same as you example and is working. And I try to build a larger tree (4 levels) and I would like to do following: class 1:14 is completed isolated even no traffic, the BW will not borow. class 1:12 is empty all the time. class 1:10 is prio 0 and class 1:11 is prio 1 1. My understanding is 1:8 and 1:2 are isolated because of ceil and will not borrow? 2. Since 1:12 is always empty, it can borrow the excess to tree 1:4 and 1:10 will get all the BW wiht prio 0. But in my case, the prio parameter seems to be not working well. It will give BW to both 1:10 and 1:11.The result I got using Ethloop is not like that. I try to start 1:10 at 300k, 1:11 at 100k, since 1:4 parent ceil is 800bps remind will be 400k. At time 10s, I put 1:10 at 900k and 1:11 at 900k, and I think the 400kbs excess will all go to 1:10 and make the flow 1:10 be 700kbs ( 1:4 ceil ). From the ethloop result, 1:10 from 30 go to 50. (equal sharing) 1:11 form 10 go to 30. (eqaul sharing) Do you think the problem is on HTB script or ethloop script or both My HTB: echo sim7 can do the priority BW echo Clean all the tc setup ./tc qdisc del dev lo root ./tc qdisc add dev lo root handle 1: htb default 12 ./tc class add dev lo parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 1500kbps ceil 1500kbps echo AF and BE ./tc class add dev lo parent 1:1 classid 1:2 htb rate 100kbps ceil 800kbps ./tc class add dev lo parent 1:2 classid 1:4 htb rate 100nbps ceil 800kbps ./tc class add dev lo parent 1:2 classid 1:10 htb rate 300kbps ceil 800kbps prio 0 ./tc class add dev lo parent 1:2 classid 1:11 htb rate 100kbps ceil 800kbps prio 1 ./tc class add dev lo parent 1:1 classid 1:12 htb rate 100kbps ceil 800kbps echo EF ./tc class add dev lo parent 1:1 classid 1:8 htb rate 100kbps ceil 700kbps ./tc class add dev lo parent 1:8 classid 1:14 htb rate 100kbps ceil 700kbps echo qdisc for AF and BE ./tc qdisc add dev lo parent 1:10 handle 20: pfifo limit 5 ./tc qdisc add dev lo parent 1:11 handle 30: pfifo limit 5 ./tc qdisc add dev lo parent 1:12 handle 40: sfq perturb 10 echo qdisc EF ./tc qdisc add dev lo parent 1:14 handle 50: sfq perturb 10 My testcase: # set simulation packet size to 1k 0 S 0 1k 0 S 1 1k 0 S 2 1k 0 S 3 1k # flow 0 AF, flow 1 BE, flow 2 excess, flow 3 EF 0 P 0 0x10010 0 P 1 0x10011 0 P 2 0x10012 0 P 3 0x10014 # start all flow at defined rate 0 R 0 300k 0 R 1 100k 0 R 2 0 0 R 3 700k # AE/BE independent of EF # AE and BE flow higher than normal excess ---Both will get BW 1R 0 900k 1R 1 900k # AE and BE back to normal excess -- Go back to original case and try again 15000R 0 300k 15000R 1 100k # BE flow higher than normal excess ---no prio flow, allow lower prio to get BW 2R 1 900k # AF flow higher than normal ---flow for low prio, both will get BW 25000R 0 900k # EF flow higher than normal 3 R 3 900k 35000X 00 Result: 0.5 231444 231444 0 0 77383 77383 0 0 0 0 0 0 540271 478572 40 0 1.0 278479 278479 0 0 92882 92882 0 0 0 0 0 0 609124 583719 61 0 1.5 298901 298901 0 0 100509 100509 0 0 0 0 0 0 615354 611911 62 0 2.0 302205 302205 0 0 101279 101279 0 0 0 0 0 0 617530 617379 63 0 2.5 305878 305878 0 0 102361 102361 0 0 0 0 0 0 616506 616471 63 0 3.0 304599 304599 0 0 102921 102921 0 0 0 0 0 0 618702 618073 63 0 3.5 307264 307264 0 0 102751 102751 0 0 0 0 0 0 618239 617715 63 0 4.0 309582 309582 0 0 103272 103272 0 0 0 0 0 0 620044 619920 63 0 4.5 309559 309559 0 0 103205 103205 0 0 0 0 0 0 619327 619298
Re: [LARTC] Ethloop again and 4 level tree ???
Dear Martin, Hello again, Thank you for you help last time. I think I understand the solution form you and Stef, but when come to ethloop, the result is not like this. I repost the question, I am pleased if you can give me a quick fix of the problem? Sorry to bother you. I try to create final checkfor htb, and still found the same problem. 1:1 (ceil 1500kbps) / \ (ceil 800kbps) 1:2 1:8 (ceil 700kbps) /\ \ 1:4 1:121:14 / \ (prio 0) 1:10 1:11 (prio 1) The tree under 1:2 is almost the same as you example and is working. And I try to build a larger tree (4 levels) and I would like to do following: class 1:14 is completed isolated even no traffic, the BW will not borow. class 1:12 is empty all the time. class 1:10 is prio 0 and class 1:11 is prio 1 1. My understanding is 1:8 and 1:2 are isolated because of ceil and will not borrow? 2. Since 1:12 is always empty, it can borrow the excess to tree 1:4 and 1:10 will get all the BW wiht prio 0. But in my case, the prio parameter seems to be not working well. It will give BW to both 1:10 and 1:11.The result I got using Ethloop is not like that. I try to start 1:10 at 300k, 1:11 at 100k, since 1:4 parent ceil is 800bps remind will be 400k. At time 10s, I put 1:10 at 900k and 1:11 at 900k, and I think the 400kbs excess will all go to 1:10 and make the flow 1:10 be 700kbs ( 1:4 ceil ). From the ethloop result, 1:10 from 30 go to 50. (equal sharing) 1:11 form 10 go to 30. (eqaul sharing) Do you think the problem is on HTB script or ethloop script or both My HTB: echo sim7 can do the priority BW echo Clean all the tc setup ./tc qdisc del dev lo root ./tc qdisc add dev lo root handle 1: htb default 12 ./tc class add dev lo parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 1500kbps ceil 1500kbps echo AF and BE ./tc class add dev lo parent 1:1 classid 1:2 htb rate 100kbps ceil 800kbps ./tc class add dev lo parent 1:2 classid 1:4 htb rate 100nbps ceil 800kbps ./tc class add dev lo parent 1:2 classid 1:10 htb rate 300kbps ceil 800kbps prio 0 ./tc class add dev lo parent 1:2 classid 1:11 htb rate 100kbps ceil 800kbps prio 1 ./tc class add dev lo parent 1:1 classid 1:12 htb rate 100kbps ceil 800kbps echo EF ./tc class add dev lo parent 1:1 classid 1:8 htb rate 100kbps ceil 700kbps ./tc class add dev lo parent 1:8 classid 1:14 htb rate 100kbps ceil 700kbps echo qdisc for AF and BE ./tc qdisc add dev lo parent 1:10 handle 20: pfifo limit 5 ./tc qdisc add dev lo parent 1:11 handle 30: pfifo limit 5 ./tc qdisc add dev lo parent 1:12 handle 40: sfq perturb 10 echo qdisc EF ./tc qdisc add dev lo parent 1:14 handle 50: sfq perturb 10 My testcase: # set simulation packet size to 1k 0 S 0 1k 0 S 1 1k 0 S 2 1k 0 S 3 1k # flow 0 AF, flow 1 BE, flow 2 excess, flow 3 EF 0 P 0 0x10010 0 P 1 0x10011 0 P 2 0x10012 0 P 3 0x10014 # start all flow at defined rate 0 R 0 300k 0 R 1 100k 0 R 2 0 0 R 3 700k # AE/BE independent of EF # AE and BE flow higher than normal excess ---Both will get BW 1R 0 900k 1R 1 900k # AE and BE back to normal excess -- Go back to original case and try again 15000R 0 300k 15000R 1 100k # BE flow higher than normal excess ---no prio flow, allow lower prio to get BW 2R 1 900k # AF flow higher than normal ---flow for low prio, both will get BW 25000R 0 900k # EF flow higher than normal 3 R 3 900k 35000X 00 Result: 0.5 231444 231444 0 0 77383 77383 0 0 0 0 0 0 540271 478572 40 0 1.0 278479 278479 0 0 92882 92882 0 0 0 0 0 0 609124 583719 61 0 1.5 298901 298901 0 0 100509 100509 0 0 0 0 0 0 615354 611911 62 0 2.0 302205 302205 0 0 101279 101279 0 0 0 0 0 0 617530 617379 63 0 2.5 305878 305878 0 0 102361 102361 0 0 0 0 0 0 616506 616471 63 0 3.0 304599 304599 0 0 102921 102921 0 0 0 0 0 0 618702 618073 63 0 3.5 307264 307264 0 0 102751 102751 0 0 0 0 0 0 618239 617715 63 0 4.0 309582 309582 0 0 103272 103272 0 0 0 0 0 0 620044 619920 63 0 4.5 309559 309559 0 0 103205 103205 0 0 0 0 0 0 619327 619298 63 0 5.0 304899 304899 0 0 102930 102930 0 0 0 0 0 0 621407 619538 63 0 5.5 307757 307757 0 0 102893 102893 0 0 0 0 0 0 618269 617825 63 0 6.0 307659 307659 0 0 102626 102626 0 0 0 0 0 0 615972 615867 63 0 6.5 308994 308994 0 0 103015 103015 0 0 0 0 0 0 618143 618118 63 0 7.0 304329 304329 0 0 102740 102740 0 0 0 0 0 0 620014 617526 61 0 7.5 307540 307540 0 0 102821 102821 0 0 0 0 0 0 617775 617184 63 0 8.0 308544 308544 0 0 102921 102921 0 0 0 0 0 0 617728 617588 63 0 8.5 308877 308877 0 0 102976
Re: [LARTC] Ethloop again and 4 level tree ???
Hello again, Thank you for you help last time. I try to create final check for htb, and found some problem. Can you give a quick fix for the problem? 1:1 (ceil 1500kbps) / \ (ceil 800kbps)1:2 1:8 (ceil 700kbps) /\ \ 1:4 1:121:14 / \ (prio 0) 1:10 1:11 (prio 1) The tree under 1:2 is almost the same as you example and is working. And I try to build a larger tree (4 levels) and I would like to do following: class 1:14 is completed isolated even no traffic, the BW will not borow. class 1:12 is empty all the time. class 1:10 is prio 0 and class 1:11 is prio 1 1. My understanding is 1:8 and 1:2 are isolated because of ceil and will not borrow? 2. Since 1:12 is always emppty, it can borrow the excess to tree 1:4 and 1:10 will get all the BW. But in my case, the prio parameter seems to be not very ok. It will give BW to both 1:10 and 1:11. My HTB: echo sim7 can do the priority BW echo Clean all the tc setup ./tc qdisc del dev lo root ./tc qdisc add dev lo root handle 1: htb default 12 ./tc class add dev lo parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 1500kbps ceil 1500kbps echo AF and BE ./tc class add dev lo parent 1:1 classid 1:2 htb rate 100kbps ceil 800kbps ./tc class add dev lo parent 1:2 classid 1:4 htb rate 100nbps ceil 800kbps ./tc class add dev lo parent 1:2 classid 1:10 htb rate 300kbps ceil 800kbps prio 0 ./tc class add dev lo parent 1:2 classid 1:11 htb rate 100kbps ceil 800kbps prio 1 ./tc class add dev lo parent 1:1 classid 1:12 htb rate 100kbps ceil 800kbps echo EF ./tc class add dev lo parent 1:1 classid 1:8 htb rate 100kbps ceil 700kbps ./tc class add dev lo parent 1:8 classid 1:14 htb rate 100kbps ceil 700kbps echo qdisc for AF and BE ./tc qdisc add dev lo parent 1:10 handle 20: pfifo limit 5 ./tc qdisc add dev lo parent 1:11 handle 30: pfifo limit 5 ./tc qdisc add dev lo parent 1:12 handle 40: sfq perturb 10 echo qdisc EF ./tc qdisc add dev lo parent 1:14 handle 50: sfq perturb 10 My testcase: # set simulation packet size to 1k 0 S 0 1k 0 S 1 1k 0 S 2 1k 0 S 3 1k # flow 0 AF, flow 1 BE, flow 2 excess, flow 3 EF 0 P 0 0x10010 0 P 1 0x10011 0 P 2 0x10012 0 P 3 0x10014 # start all flow at defined rate 0 R 0 300k 0 R 1 100k 0 R 2 0 0 R 3 700k # AE/BE independent of EF # AE and BE flow higher than normal excess ---Both will get BW 1R 0 900k 1R 1 900k # AE and BE back to normal excess 15000R 0 300k 15000R 1 100k # BE flow higher than normal excess ---no prio flow, allow lower prio to get BW 2R 1 900k # AF flow higher than normal ---Both will get BW 25000R 0 900k # EF flow higher than normal 3 R 3 900k 35000X 00 Result: 0.5 231444 231444 0 0 77383 77383 0 0 0 0 0 0 540271 478572 40 0 1.0 278479 278479 0 0 92882 92882 0 0 0 0 0 0 609124 583719 61 0 1.5 298901 298901 0 0 100509 100509 0 0 0 0 0 0 615354 611911 62 0 2.0 302205 302205 0 0 101279 101279 0 0 0 0 0 0 617530 617379 63 0 2.5 305878 305878 0 0 102361 102361 0 0 0 0 0 0 616506 616471 63 0 3.0 304599 304599 0 0 102921 102921 0 0 0 0 0 0 618702 618073 63 0 3.5 307264 307264 0 0 102751 102751 0 0 0 0 0 0 618239 617715 63 0 4.0 309582 309582 0 0 103272 103272 0 0 0 0 0 0 620044 619920 63 0 4.5 309559 309559 0 0 103205 103205 0 0 0 0 0 0 619327 619298 63 0 5.0 304899 304899 0 0 102930 102930 0 0 0 0 0 0 621407 619538 63 0 5.5 307757 307757 0 0 102893 102893 0 0 0 0 0 0 618269 617825 63 0 6.0 307659 307659 0 0 102626 102626 0 0 0 0 0 0 615972 615867 63 0 6.5 308994 308994 0 0 103015 103015 0 0 0 0 0 0 618143 618118 63 0 7.0 304329 304329 0 0 102740 102740 0 0 0 0 0 0 620014 617526 61 0 7.5 307540 307540 0 0 102821 102821 0 0 0 0 0 0 617775 617184 63 0 8.0 308544 308544 0 0 102921 102921 0 0 0 0 0 0 617728 617588 63 0 8.5 308877 308877 0 0 102976 102976 0 0 0 0 0 0 619844 619811 63 0 9.0 302607 302607 0 0 100873 100873 0 0 0 0 0 0 620449 617339 61 0 9.5 306437 306437 0 0 102147 102147 0 0 0 0 0 0 616490 615752 63 0 10.0 300719 300719 0 0 100240 100240 0 0 0 0 0 0 604882 617636 63 0 10.5 777898 471982 0 0 729513 264159 0 0 0 0 0 0 609705 618402 43 0 11.0 863025 505560 0 0 851542 297668 0 0 0 0 0 0 619129 616713 41 0 11.5 909551 512577 0 0 906826 306202 0 0 0 0 0 0 618050 617476 43 0 12.0 921768 513819 0 0 921121 307972 0 0 0 0 0 0 618739 618603 43 0 12.5 907931 513704 0 0 905857 308147 0 0 0 0 0 0 619284 616925 43 0 13.0 886514 523490 0 0 883462 304891 0 0 0 0 0 0 624941 617690 40 0 13.5 915565 515999 0 0 886622 307416 0 0 0 0 0 0 620989 619268 42 0 14.0 923631 514873 0 0 879157 308406 0 0 0 0 0 0 618273 617864 43 0 14.5 927437
Re: [LARTC] Ethloop again and 4 level tree ???
On Saturday 08 June 2002 20:10, King Yung Tong wrote: Hello again, Thank you for you help last time. I try to create final check for htb, and found some problem. Can you give a quick fix for the problem? 1:1 (ceil 1500kbps) / \ (ceil 800kbps)1:2 1:8 (ceil 700kbps) /\ \ 1:4 1:121:14 / \ (prio 0) 1:10 1:11 (prio 1) The tree under 1:2 is almost the same as you example and is working. And I try to build a larger tree (4 levels) and I would like to do following: class 1:14 is completed isolated even no traffic, the BW will not borow. class 1:12 is empty all the time. class 1:10 is prio 0 and class 1:11 is prio 1 1. My understanding is 1:8 and 1:2 are isolated because of ceil and will not borrow? 2. Since 1:12 is always emppty, it can borrow the excess to tree 1:4 and 1:10 will get all the BW. But in my case, the prio parameter seems to be not very ok. It will give BW to both 1:10 and 1:11. HTB will try to give each class it's rate as a minimum : ./tc class add dev lo parent 1:2 classid 1:10 htb rate 300kbps ceil 800kbps prio 0 ./tc class add dev lo parent 1:2 classid 1:11 htb rate 100kbps ceil 800kbps prio 1 So class 1:10 gets 300kbps and class 1:11 gets 100kbps. The other 400kbps will go to class 1:10 beacause his prio is lower. So prio is for traffic that's left after each class gets his rate. I hope I'm right, Devik ? :) Stef -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using Linux as bandwidth manager http://www.docum.org/ #lartc @ irc.openprojects.net ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Re: [LARTC] Ethloop?
What is the problem ? use cat ethloop_script|./ethloop for example .. devik On Thu, 6 Jun 2002, King Yung Tong wrote: Dear all, I copy a Ethloop script for tc script, but no response??? Does anyone know how to use ethloop? Ethloop; #1st parameter -- time in milliseconds from program start #2nd parameter -- operation to do #3rd parameter -- flow id #4th parameter -- operation dependent # #e.g 5000 R 2 450 #means at time 5sec set rate of flow 2 to 4.5MBps #Time should be in increasing time order #Each line is executed at its time and will change the ongoing traffic generators #example1 #Two flow simulation # Two flow simulation # lo will be used to TX and RX 0 i P 0x10010 lo 0 i P 0x10020 lo # set simulation packet size to 1k 0 S P 0x100101k 0 S P 0x10020 1k # start both flows 0 R P 0x10010100k 0 R P 0x10020100k # flow 1 to 50k and 10k later 2000R P 0x1001050k 4000R P 0x1002010k # finish at 6sec 6000X 00 tc script: echo Clean all the tc setup ./tc qdisc del dev eth0 root echo Core router echo Create qdisc and set default to 1:30 ./tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1: htb default 30 ./tc class add dev eth1 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 1.5Mbit burst 50k echo Create class for EF ./tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 0.5Mbit ceil 0.5Mbit burst 50k prio 1 echo Create class for AF ./tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:2 classid 1:20 htb rate 0.5Mbit ceil 1Mbit burst 30K prio 1 echo Create class for BE ./tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:2 classid 1:30 htb rate 0.3Mbit ceil 1Mbit burst 30k prio 2 ./tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 1:30 red limit 1800KB min 150KB max 450KB burst 200 avpkt 1000 bandwidth 1Mbit probability 0.4 echo Filter ./tc filter add dev eth1 parent 1: protocol ip prio 1 u32 match ip tos 0xb8 0xff classid 1:10 ./tc filter add dev eth1 parent 1: protocol ip prio 2 u32 match ip tos 0x0 0xff classid 1:20 ./tc filter add dev eth1 parent 1: protocol ip prio 3 u32 match ip tos 0x98 0xff classid 1:30 Thank you Patrick ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/ ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Re: [LARTC] Ethloop?
Thank you for you answer, 1:10 is incresed but 1:20 is also increased and increase to the specific rate if I add 100kbps to every line. In my case, I would like to put all the extra to 1:10 only, is that means I have to give 1:11 ceil to 10kbps. If it is, is that means I don't need prio paramter? How prio parameter works? echo Clean all the tc setup ./tc qdisc del dev lo root ./tc qdisc add dev lo root handle 1: htb default 12 ./tc class add dev lo parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 100kbps ceil 100kbps ./tc class add dev lo parent 1:1 classid 1:2 htb rate 40kbps ceil 100kbps ./tc class add dev lo parent 1:2 classid 1:10 htb rate 30kbps ceil 100kbps prio 0 ./tc class add dev lo parent 1:2 classid 1:11 htb rate 10kbps ceil 100kbps -- 10Kbps?? prio 1 ./tc class add dev lo parent 1:1 classid 1:12 htb rate 60kbps ceil 100kbps echo qdisc ./tc qdisc add dev lo parent 1:10 handle 20: pfifo limit 5 ./tc qdisc add dev lo parent 1:11 handle 30: pfifo limit 5 ./tc qdisc add dev lo parent 1:12 handle 40: sfq perturb 10 On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Martin Devera wrote: You either missed ceil parameter or it is missing on my page :) Without ceil it is the same as rate thus all classes are bounded in fact. Add ceil 100kbps to each line. devik On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, King Yung Tong wrote: Thank you for your reply :) I try to follow chapter 6 on your user guide. 1:1 / \ 1:2 1:12 / \ 1:10 1:11 (prio1) (prio2) If 1:12 don't have any traffic, all the BW on 1:12 can be assigned to 1:2, is that right? I try to put all these extra (from 1:12) to 1:10, my htb script is as follows, and I use ethloop to test and I found that 1:10 will not get the extra from 1:12. Could you tell me where I make a mistake? Thank you. echo Clean all the tc setup ./tc qdisc del dev lo root ./tc qdisc add dev lo root handle 1: htb default 12 ./tc class add dev lo parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 100kbps ./tc class add dev lo parent 1:1 classid 1:2 htb rate 40kbps ./tc class add dev lo parent 1:2 classid 1:10 htb rate 30kbps prio 0 ./tc class add dev lo parent 1:2 classid 1:11 htb rate 10kbps prio 1 ./tc class add dev lo parent 1:1 classid 1:12 htb rate 60kbps echo qdisc ./tc qdisc add dev lo parent 1:10 handle 20: pfifo limit 5 ./tc qdisc add dev lo parent 1:11 handle 30: pfifo limit 5 ./tc qdisc add dev lo parent 1:12 handle 40: sfq perturb 10 Input for ethloop: # lo will be used to TX and RX 0 i 0 lo 0 i 1 lo 0 i 2 lo # set simulation packet size to 1k 0 S 0 1k 0 S 1 1k 0 S 2 1k # flow 0 AE, flow 1 BE, flow 2 EF 0 P 0 0x10010 0 P 1 0x10011 0 P 2 0x10012 # start all flow at defined rate 0 R 0 3 0 R 1 1 0 R 2 6 # Create extra at 1:12 and borrow this to 1:2 --? 5000R 0 3 5000R 1 1 5000R 2 0 # 1:10 and 1:11 and 1:10 should get higher value --? 15000R 0 4 15000R 1 2 # finish at 8sec 25000X 00 Result is to long, I use gnuplot and found that 1:10 at most get 3. Thank you for you help. Pat On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Martin Devera wrote: What is the problem ? use cat ethloop_script|./ethloop for example .. devik On Thu, 6 Jun 2002, King Yung Tong wrote: ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Re: [LARTC] Ethloop?
Thank you for you help. Here is the HTB echo Clean all the tc setup ./tc qdisc del dev lo root ./tc qdisc add dev lo root handle 1: htb default 12 ./tc class add dev lo parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 100kbps ceil 100kbps ./tc class add dev lo parent 1:1 classid 1:2 htb rate 40kbps ceil 100kbps ./tc class add dev lo parent 1:2 classid 1:10 htb rate 30kbps ceil 100kbps prio 0 ./tc class add dev lo parent 1:2 classid 1:11 htb rate 10kbps ceil 100kbps prio 1 ./tc class add dev lo parent 1:1 classid 1:12 htb rate 60kbps ceil 100kbps echo qdisc ./tc qdisc add dev lo parent 1:10 handle 20: pfifo limit 5 ./tc qdisc add dev lo parent 1:11 handle 30: pfifo limit 5 ./tc qdisc add dev lo parent 1:12 handle 40: sfq perturb 10 _1:11 / / _/___ 1:12 (to should not be increse)??? / ---/ Result 0.5 23233 23233 0 0 7744 7744 0 0 44545 44545 0 0 1.0 28987 28987 0 0 9662 9662 0 0 57518 57518 0 0 1.5 29609 29609 0 0 10139 10139 0 0 59920 59920 0 0 2.0 30583 30583 0 0 10258 10258 0 0 59877 59877 0 0 2.5 28941 28941 0 0 10308 10308 0 0 58869 58869 0 0 3.0 30374 30374 0 0 10282 10282 0 0 60982 60982 0 0 3.5 29747 29747 0 0 8874 8874 0 0 59755 59755 0 0 4.0 29736 29736 0 0 9818 9818 0 0 59993 59993 0 0 4.5 30679 30679 0 0 10204 10204 0 0 14237 14237 0 0 5.0 29897 29897 0 0 10365 10365 0 0 3378 3378 0 0 5.5 30670 30670 0 0 10318 10318 0 0 802 802 0 0 6.0 30576 30576 0 0 10214 10214 0 0 190 190 0 0 6.5 28799 28799 0 0 10245 10245 0 0 45 45 0 0 7.0 30321 30321 0 0 8340 8340 0 0 11 11 0 0 7.5 45445 45445 0 0 18142 18142 0 0 3 3 0 0 8.0 48046 48046 0 0 19985 19985 0 0 1 1 0 0 8.5 50644 50644 0 0 17879 17879 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.0 50885 50885 0 0 19094 19094 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.5 50467 50467 0 0 20211 20211 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.0 49349 49349 0 0 20513 20513 0 0 0 0 0 0 On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Martin Devera wrote: Thank you for you answer, 1:10 is incresed but 1:20 is also increased and increase to the specific rate if I add 100kbps to every line. sounds weird. With higher prio 1:10 should get 90k and 1:11 10k. In my case, I would like to put all the extra to 1:10 only, is that means I have to give 1:11 ceil to 10kbps. If it is, is that means I don't need prio paramter? How prio parameter works? your understanding is ok, tge ceil 10k is correct - the prio is meant for lowering delay and change in excess distribution is only secondary product. Port the resulting graph somewhere so I can look at it. devik ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/ ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Re: [LARTC] Ethloop?
Thank you, I put 100kbps to both 1:11 and 1:10. 1:10 (prio 0) get almost 50kbps form 60kbps excess and 1:20 (prio 1) get 10kbps form excess. Is it the expected result? I gussess the all 60kbps (excess) should go to prio 0 or by proportional to rate in each class. Pat On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Martin Devera wrote: Ok. It seems you generate only 40kbps by ethloop script. Then you can't expect your lines to go higher ! Generate 100kbps to 1:11 and 1:10 ... devik On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, King Yung Tong wrote: Here is the version and info. Version htb3_2.4.17 [root@samwise htb]# ./tc -s -d class show dev lo class htb 1:11 parent 1:2 leaf 30: prio 1 quantum 1024 rate 80Kbit ceil 800Kbit burst 1701b/8 mpu 0b cburst 2623b/8 mpu 0b level 0 Sent 130048 bytes 127 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) rate 254bps lended: 100 borrowed: 27 giants: 0 tokens: -60449 ctokens: 12800 class htb 1:1 root rate 800Kbit ceil 800Kbit burst 2623b/8 mpu 0b cburst 2623b/8 mpu 0b level 7 Sent 730112 bytes 713 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) rate 1426bps 1pps lended: 81 borrowed: 0 giants: 0 tokens: 12800 ctokens: 12800 class htb 1:10 parent 1:2 leaf 20: prio 0 quantum 3072 rate 240Kbit ceil 800Kbit burst 1906b/8 mpu 0b cburst 2623b/8 mpu 0b level 0 Sent 360448 bytes 352 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) rate 704bps lended: 298 borrowed: 54 giants: 0 tokens: -36462 ctokens: 12800 class htb 1:2 parent 1:1 rate 320Kbit ceil 800Kbit burst 2008b/8 mpu 0b cburst 2623b/8 mpu 0b level 6 Sent 490496 bytes 479 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) rate 958bps lended: 0 borrowed: 81 giants: 0 tokens: -62221 ctokens: 12800 class htb 1:12 parent 1:1 leaf 40: prio 0 quantum 6144 rate 480Kbit ceil 800Kbit burst 2213b/8 mpu 0b cburst 2623b/8 mpu 0b level 0 Sent 239616 bytes 234 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) rate 426bps lended: 234 borrowed: 0 giants: 0 tokens: 15867 ctokens: 12800 result for all line with 100kbps (pic5) 0.5 23947 23947 0 0 7982 7982 0 0 45228 45228 0 0 1.0 29036 29036 0 0 9571 9571 0 0 57118 57118 0 0 1.5 29318 29318 0 0 10107 10107 0 0 59489 59489 0 0 2.0 30522 30522 0 0 10253 10253 0 0 59327 59327 0 0 2.5 28197 28197 0 0 10280 10280 0 0 61159 61159 0 0 3.0 30910 30910 0 0 7927 7927 0 0 59985 59985 0 0 3.5 30991 30991 0 0 7935 7935 0 0 60665 60665 0 0 4.0 28994 28994 0 0 9598 9598 0 0 59183 59183 0 0 4.5 30150 30150 0 0 10034 10034 0 0 14044 14044 0 0 5.0 28662 28662 0 0 10458 10458 0 0 0 0 5.5 30876 30876 0 0 10506 10506 0 0 791 791 0 0 6.0 28540 28540 0 0 10523 10523 0 0 188 188 0 0 6.5 29107 29107 0 0 10154 10154 0 0 45 45 0 0 7.0 30387 30387 0 0 8500 8500 0 0 11 11 0 0 7.5 45085 45085 0 0 18230 18230 0 0 3 3 0 0 8.0 49523 49523 0 0 19855 19855 0 0 1 1 0 0 8.5 49546 49546 0 0 20405 20405 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.0 50916 50916 0 0 18643 18643 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.5 50410 50410 0 0 20082 20082 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.0 48597 48597 0 0 20453 20453 0 0 0 0 0 0 On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Martin Devera wrote: What version of HTB do you use ? Send me tc -s -d class show dev xxx outoput after test pic5 generation. devik On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, King Yung Tong wrote: Thank you again for you help! Attach is the pic5 for the ceil equal to 100kbps for all line. pic10limit for the ceil equal to 100kbps except 1:20. My objective is to show if not prio is set the excess should allocate according to rate. If the prio is set, the high prio should get more. On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Martin Devera wrote: Thank you for you answer, 1:10 is incresed but 1:20 is also increased and increase to the specific rate if I add 100kbps to every line. sounds weird. With higher prio 1:10 should get 90k and 1:11 10k. In my case, I would like to put all the extra to 1:10 only, is that means I have to give 1:11 ceil to 10kbps. If it is, is that means I don't need prio paramter? How prio parameter works? your understanding is ok, tge ceil 10k is correct - the prio is meant for lowering delay and change in excess distribution is only secondary product. Port the resulting graph somewhere so I can look at it. devik ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/ ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/ ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Re: [LARTC] Ethloop?
ethloop output (as text) On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, King Yung Tong wrote: Thank you, I put 100kbps to both 1:11 and 1:10. 1:10 (prio 0) get almost 50kbps form 60kbps excess and 1:20 (prio 1) get 10kbps form excess. Is it the expected result? I gussess the all 60kbps (excess) should go to prio 0 or by proportional to rate in each class. Pat On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Martin Devera wrote: Ok. It seems you generate only 40kbps by ethloop script. Then you can't expect your lines to go higher ! Generate 100kbps to 1:11 and 1:10 ... devik On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, King Yung Tong wrote: Here is the version and info. Version htb3_2.4.17 [root@samwise htb]# ./tc -s -d class show dev lo class htb 1:11 parent 1:2 leaf 30: prio 1 quantum 1024 rate 80Kbit ceil 800Kbit burst 1701b/8 mpu 0b cburst 2623b/8 mpu 0b level 0 Sent 130048 bytes 127 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) rate 254bps lended: 100 borrowed: 27 giants: 0 tokens: -60449 ctokens: 12800 class htb 1:1 root rate 800Kbit ceil 800Kbit burst 2623b/8 mpu 0b cburst 2623b/8 mpu 0b level 7 Sent 730112 bytes 713 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) rate 1426bps 1pps lended: 81 borrowed: 0 giants: 0 tokens: 12800 ctokens: 12800 class htb 1:10 parent 1:2 leaf 20: prio 0 quantum 3072 rate 240Kbit ceil 800Kbit burst 1906b/8 mpu 0b cburst 2623b/8 mpu 0b level 0 Sent 360448 bytes 352 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) rate 704bps lended: 298 borrowed: 54 giants: 0 tokens: -36462 ctokens: 12800 class htb 1:2 parent 1:1 rate 320Kbit ceil 800Kbit burst 2008b/8 mpu 0b cburst 2623b/8 mpu 0b level 6 Sent 490496 bytes 479 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) rate 958bps lended: 0 borrowed: 81 giants: 0 tokens: -62221 ctokens: 12800 class htb 1:12 parent 1:1 leaf 40: prio 0 quantum 6144 rate 480Kbit ceil 800Kbit burst 2213b/8 mpu 0b cburst 2623b/8 mpu 0b level 0 Sent 239616 bytes 234 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) rate 426bps lended: 234 borrowed: 0 giants: 0 tokens: 15867 ctokens: 12800 result for all line with 100kbps (pic5) 0.5 23947 23947 0 0 7982 7982 0 0 45228 45228 0 0 1.0 29036 29036 0 0 9571 9571 0 0 57118 57118 0 0 1.5 29318 29318 0 0 10107 10107 0 0 59489 59489 0 0 2.0 30522 30522 0 0 10253 10253 0 0 59327 59327 0 0 2.5 28197 28197 0 0 10280 10280 0 0 61159 61159 0 0 3.0 30910 30910 0 0 7927 7927 0 0 59985 59985 0 0 3.5 30991 30991 0 0 7935 7935 0 0 60665 60665 0 0 4.0 28994 28994 0 0 9598 9598 0 0 59183 59183 0 0 4.5 30150 30150 0 0 10034 10034 0 0 14044 14044 0 0 5.0 28662 28662 0 0 10458 10458 0 0 0 0 5.5 30876 30876 0 0 10506 10506 0 0 791 791 0 0 6.0 28540 28540 0 0 10523 10523 0 0 188 188 0 0 6.5 29107 29107 0 0 10154 10154 0 0 45 45 0 0 7.0 30387 30387 0 0 8500 8500 0 0 11 11 0 0 7.5 45085 45085 0 0 18230 18230 0 0 3 3 0 0 8.0 49523 49523 0 0 19855 19855 0 0 1 1 0 0 8.5 49546 49546 0 0 20405 20405 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.0 50916 50916 0 0 18643 18643 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.5 50410 50410 0 0 20082 20082 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.0 48597 48597 0 0 20453 20453 0 0 0 0 0 0 On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Martin Devera wrote: What version of HTB do you use ? Send me tc -s -d class show dev xxx outoput after test pic5 generation. devik On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, King Yung Tong wrote: Thank you again for you help! Attach is the pic5 for the ceil equal to 100kbps for all line. pic10limit for the ceil equal to 100kbps except 1:20. My objective is to show if not prio is set the excess should allocate according to rate. If the prio is set, the high prio should get more. On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Martin Devera wrote: Thank you for you answer, 1:10 is incresed but 1:20 is also increased and increase to the specific rate if I add 100kbps to every line. sounds weird. With higher prio 1:10 should get 90k and 1:11 10k. In my case, I would like to put all the extra to 1:10 only, is that means I have to give 1:11 ceil to 10kbps. If it is, is that means I don't need prio paramter? How prio parameter works? your understanding is ok, tge ceil 10k is correct - the prio is meant for lowering delay and change in excess distribution is only secondary product. Port the resulting graph somewhere so I can look at it. devik ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/ ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/ ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [LARTC] Ethloop?
Thank you, I put 100kbps to both 1:11 and 1:10. 1:10 (prio 0) get almost 50kbps form 60kbps excess and 1:20 (prio 1) get 10kbps form excess. Is it the expected result? I gussess the all 60kbps (excess) should go to prio 0 or by proportional to rate in each class. The rate on the original class is 1:3. ./tc class add dev lo parent 1:2 classid 1:10 htb rate 30kbps ceil 100kbps prio 0 ./tc class add dev lo parent 1:2 classid 1:11 htb rate 10kbps ceil 100kbps prio 1 0.5 23490 23490 0 0 7830 7830 0 0 46202 46202 0 0 1.0 29308 29308 0 0 9471 9471 0 0 57537 57537 0 0 1.5 30066 30066 0 0 10311 10311 0 0 58370 58370 0 0 2.0 30364 30364 0 0 10190 10190 0 0 59133 59133 0 0 2.5 28144 28144 0 0 10251 10251 0 0 61029 61029 0 0 3.0 30859 30859 0 0 7907 7907 0 0 59899 59899 0 0 3.5 30563 30563 0 0 8694 8694 0 0 60245 60245 0 0 4.0 29243 29243 0 0 9873 9873 0 0 58596 58596 0 0 4.5 83553 74535 30 0 78956 16722 205 0 13905 13905 $5.0 97047 89562 20 0 95957 10635 438 0 3300 3300 0 05.5 100414 88939 38 0 100155 13212 553 0 783 783 0 06.0 101170 92980 20 0 101108 9802 570 0 186 186 0 0 6.5 98639 89751 38 0 98624 13015 577 0 44 44 0 0 7.0 99815 93172 20 0 99812 9755 578 0 10 10 0 0 7.5 63232 65056 0 0 39204 23397 41 0 3 3 0 0 8.0 54142 54575 0 0 22722 18971 3 0 1 1 0 0 8.5 51258 51361 0 0 21080 20189 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.0 50674 50698 0 0 20406 20195 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.5 49723 49729 0 0 20402 20351 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.0 51020 51021 0 0 20529 20517 0 0 0 0 0 0 On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Martin Devera wrote: ethloop output (as text) On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, King Yung Tong wrote: Pat On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Martin Devera wrote: Ok. It seems you generate only 40kbps by ethloop script. Then you can't expect your lines to go higher ! Generate 100kbps to 1:11 and 1:10 ... devik On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, King Yung Tong wrote: Here is the version and info. Version htb3_2.4.17 [root@samwise htb]# ./tc -s -d class show dev lo class htb 1:11 parent 1:2 leaf 30: prio 1 quantum 1024 rate 80Kbit ceil 800Kbit burst 1701b/8 mpu 0b cburst 2623b/8 mpu 0b level 0 Sent 130048 bytes 127 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) rate 254bps lended: 100 borrowed: 27 giants: 0 tokens: -60449 ctokens: 12800 class htb 1:1 root rate 800Kbit ceil 800Kbit burst 2623b/8 mpu 0b cburst 2623b/8 mpu 0b level 7 Sent 730112 bytes 713 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) rate 1426bps 1pps lended: 81 borrowed: 0 giants: 0 tokens: 12800 ctokens: 12800 class htb 1:10 parent 1:2 leaf 20: prio 0 quantum 3072 rate 240Kbit ceil 800Kbit burst 1906b/8 mpu 0b cburst 2623b/8 mpu 0b level 0 Sent 360448 bytes 352 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) rate 704bps lended: 298 borrowed: 54 giants: 0 tokens: -36462 ctokens: 12800 class htb 1:2 parent 1:1 rate 320Kbit ceil 800Kbit burst 2008b/8 mpu 0b cburst 2623b/8 mpu 0b level 6 Sent 490496 bytes 479 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) rate 958bps lended: 0 borrowed: 81 giants: 0 tokens: -62221 ctokens: 12800 class htb 1:12 parent 1:1 leaf 40: prio 0 quantum 6144 rate 480Kbit ceil 800Kbit burst 2213b/8 mpu 0b cburst 2623b/8 mpu 0b level 0 Sent 239616 bytes 234 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) rate 426bps lended: 234 borrowed: 0 giants: 0 tokens: 15867 ctokens: 12800 result for all line with 100kbps (pic5) 0.5 23947 23947 0 0 7982 7982 0 0 45228 45228 0 0 1.0 29036 29036 0 0 9571 9571 0 0 57118 57118 0 0 1.5 29318 29318 0 0 10107 10107 0 0 59489 59489 0 0 2.0 30522 30522 0 0 10253 10253 0 0 59327 59327 0 0 2.5 28197 28197 0 0 10280 10280 0 0 61159 61159 0 0 3.0 30910 30910 0 0 7927 7927 0 0 59985 59985 0 0 3.5 30991 30991 0 0 7935 7935 0 0 60665 60665 0 0 4.0 28994 28994 0 0 9598 9598 0 0 59183 59183 0 0 4.5 30150 30150 0 0 10034 10034 0 0 14044 14044 0 0 5.0 28662 28662 0 0 10458 10458 0 0 0 0 5.5 30876 30876 0 0 10506 10506 0 0 791 791 0 0 6.0 28540 28540 0 0 10523 10523 0 0 188 188 0 0 6.5 29107 29107 0 0 10154 10154 0 0 45 45 0 0 7.0 30387 30387 0 0 8500 8500 0 0 11 11 0 0 7.5 45085 45085 0 0 18230 18230 0 0 3 3 0 0 8.0 49523 49523 0 0 19855 19855 0 0 1 1 0 0 8.5 49546 49546 0 0 20405 20405 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.0 50916 50916 0 0 18643 18643 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.5 50410 50410 0 0 20082 20082 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.0 48597 48597 0 0 20453 20453 0 0 0 0 0 0 On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Martin Devera wrote: What version of HTB do you use ? Send me tc -s -d class show dev xxx outoput after test pic5 generation. devik On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, King Yung Tong wrote: Thank you again for you help! Attach is the pic5 for the ceil equal to 100kbps for all line. pic10limit for the ceil equal to 100kbps except 1:20. My objective is to show if not prio is set the excess should allocate according to rate. If
Re: [LARTC] Ethloop?
6.0 101170 92980 20 0 101108 9802 570 0 186 186 0 0 6.5 98639 89751 38 0 98624 13015 577 0 44 44 0 0 7.0 99815 93172 20 0 99812 9755 578 0 10 10 0 0 here it is exacly what you want 7.5 63232 65056 0 0 39204 23397 41 0 3 3 0 0 8.0 54142 54575 0 0 22722 18971 3 0 1 1 0 0 8.5 51258 51361 0 0 21080 20189 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.0 50674 50698 0 0 20406 20195 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.5 49723 49729 0 0 20402 20351 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.0 51020 51021 0 0 20529 20517 0 0 0 0 0 0 end here generated rate seems to be 50k not 100 ! seems you need to repair other line in your ethloop script On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Martin Devera wrote: ethloop output (as text) On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, King Yung Tong wrote: Pat On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Martin Devera wrote: Ok. It seems you generate only 40kbps by ethloop script. Then you can't expect your lines to go higher ! Generate 100kbps to 1:11 and 1:10 ... devik On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, King Yung Tong wrote: Here is the version and info. Version htb3_2.4.17 [root@samwise htb]# ./tc -s -d class show dev lo class htb 1:11 parent 1:2 leaf 30: prio 1 quantum 1024 rate 80Kbit ceil 800Kbit burst 1701b/8 mpu 0b cburst 2623b/8 mpu 0b level 0 Sent 130048 bytes 127 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) rate 254bps lended: 100 borrowed: 27 giants: 0 tokens: -60449 ctokens: 12800 class htb 1:1 root rate 800Kbit ceil 800Kbit burst 2623b/8 mpu 0b cburst 2623b/8 mpu 0b level 7 Sent 730112 bytes 713 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) rate 1426bps 1pps lended: 81 borrowed: 0 giants: 0 tokens: 12800 ctokens: 12800 class htb 1:10 parent 1:2 leaf 20: prio 0 quantum 3072 rate 240Kbit ceil 800Kbit burst 1906b/8 mpu 0b cburst 2623b/8 mpu 0b level 0 Sent 360448 bytes 352 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) rate 704bps lended: 298 borrowed: 54 giants: 0 tokens: -36462 ctokens: 12800 class htb 1:2 parent 1:1 rate 320Kbit ceil 800Kbit burst 2008b/8 mpu 0b cburst 2623b/8 mpu 0b level 6 Sent 490496 bytes 479 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) rate 958bps lended: 0 borrowed: 81 giants: 0 tokens: -62221 ctokens: 12800 class htb 1:12 parent 1:1 leaf 40: prio 0 quantum 6144 rate 480Kbit ceil 800Kbit burst 2213b/8 mpu 0b cburst 2623b/8 mpu 0b level 0 Sent 239616 bytes 234 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) rate 426bps lended: 234 borrowed: 0 giants: 0 tokens: 15867 ctokens: 12800 result for all line with 100kbps (pic5) 0.5 23947 23947 0 0 7982 7982 0 0 45228 45228 0 0 1.0 29036 29036 0 0 9571 9571 0 0 57118 57118 0 0 1.5 29318 29318 0 0 10107 10107 0 0 59489 59489 0 0 2.0 30522 30522 0 0 10253 10253 0 0 59327 59327 0 0 2.5 28197 28197 0 0 10280 10280 0 0 61159 61159 0 0 3.0 30910 30910 0 0 7927 7927 0 0 59985 59985 0 0 3.5 30991 30991 0 0 7935 7935 0 0 60665 60665 0 0 4.0 28994 28994 0 0 9598 9598 0 0 59183 59183 0 0 4.5 30150 30150 0 0 10034 10034 0 0 14044 14044 0 0 5.0 28662 28662 0 0 10458 10458 0 0 0 0 5.5 30876 30876 0 0 10506 10506 0 0 791 791 0 0 6.0 28540 28540 0 0 10523 10523 0 0 188 188 0 0 6.5 29107 29107 0 0 10154 10154 0 0 45 45 0 0 7.0 30387 30387 0 0 8500 8500 0 0 11 11 0 0 7.5 45085 45085 0 0 18230 18230 0 0 3 3 0 0 8.0 49523 49523 0 0 19855 19855 0 0 1 1 0 0 8.5 49546 49546 0 0 20405 20405 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.0 50916 50916 0 0 18643 18643 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.5 50410 50410 0 0 20082 20082 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.0 48597 48597 0 0 20453 20453 0 0 0 0 0 0 On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Martin Devera wrote: What version of HTB do you use ? Send me tc -s -d class show dev xxx outoput after test pic5 generation. devik On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, King Yung Tong wrote: Thank you again for you help! Attach is the pic5 for the ceil equal to 100kbps for all line. pic10limit for the ceil equal to 100kbps except 1:20. My objective is to show if not prio is set the excess should allocate according to rate. If the prio is set, the high prio should get more. On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Martin Devera wrote: Thank you for you answer, 1:10 is incresed but 1:20 is also increased and increase to the specific rate if I add 100kbps to every line. sounds weird. With higher prio 1:10 should get 90k and 1:11 10k. In my case, I would like to put all the extra to 1:10 only, is that means I have to give 1:11 ceil to 10kbps. If it is, is that means I don't need prio paramter? How prio parameter works? your understanding is ok, tge ceil 10k is correct - the prio is meant for lowering delay and change in excess distribution is only secondary product.
