Re: [LARTC] IMQ + natin PREROUTING - it is almost 2 years since patch....

2004-06-22 Thread Andre Correa
In fact we've being discussing lately at linuximq.net mailling list this 
subject and what would be the best way to enable this "behavior" change 
"automatically".

There is no problem on changing where IMQ hooks, after or before NAT for 
example, not that we found until now.

The matter is what should be done to enable the selection of behaviors 
without needing to apply a patch or change the code itself. For IMQ as 
module I've thought about passing a parameter, but if it is compiled in 
the kernel what could be the way? Something in the /proc???

It should be possible to select from 4 diferent situations:
PREROUTING POSTROUTING
-
 1  IMQ after NAT  IMQ after NAT
 2  IMQ before NAT IMQ after NAT
 3  IMQ after NAT  IMQ before NAT
 4  IMQ before NAT IMQ before NAT
Any ideas are welcome.
tks
Andre

pljosh wrote:
Hello there!
I was reading this archive:
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2002q3/004725.html
It was almost two years ago when Patrick wrote a patch to switch IMQ 
with nat in PREROUTING chain...

 From www.linuximq.org I've downloaded newset IMQ driver for 2.4.26 and 
what can i see? The line that Patrick changed in that patch is still as 
it was in previous relases.

Are there some side-effects or something that this patch wasent applied 
to "official" imq?

-josh
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/


[LARTC] IMQ + natin PREROUTING - it is almost 2 years since patch....

2004-06-21 Thread pljosh
Hello there!
I was reading this archive:
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2002q3/004725.html
It was almost two years ago when Patrick wrote a patch to switch IMQ 
with nat in PREROUTING chain...

From www.linuximq.org I've downloaded newset IMQ driver for 2.4.26 and 
what can i see? The line that Patrick changed in that patch is still as 
it was in previous relases.

Are there some side-effects or something that this patch wasent applied 
to "official" imq?

-josh
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/