Re: [LARTC] Problem With Load Balancing the Links

2002-12-23 Thread Julian Anastasov 

Hello,

On Mon, 23 Dec 2002, hare ram wrote:

 iam using redhat 8.0 with Latest Kernel
 2.4.18-18.0
 with iproute
 [root@pdn root]# rpm -q iproute
 iproute-2.4.7-5

I'm not sure if 2.4.7-5 covers the desired version but here it is:

ftp://ftp.inr.ac.ru/ip-routing/iproute2-2.4.7-now-ss020116-try.tar.gz

 is this Corect or i need to still upgrade
 if so, i did not find latest than this

You can always list the above directory for latest tarballs

 thanks
 hare

Regards

--
Julian Anastasov [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] Problem With Load Balancing the Links

2002-12-23 Thread hare ram 
Hi

thanks, for the suggestion
let me look and install this latest one

as you have mentioned in the documents, the last time should be default, but
why iam getting 253 here

0:  from all lookup local
50: from all lookup main
201:from 202.63.96.0/24 lookup 201
202:from 202.63.111.150/24 lookup 202
222:from all lookup 222
32766:  from all lookup main
32767:  from all lookup 253

and iam not able to Ping or go out from My gateway IP
i can only Ping my Gateway IP's

thanks
hare



- Original Message -
From: Julian Anastasov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: hare ram [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 3:57 PM
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Problem With Load Balancing the Links



 Hello,

 On Mon, 23 Dec 2002, hare ram wrote:

  iam using redhat 8.0 with Latest Kernel
  2.4.18-18.0
  with iproute
  [root@pdn root]# rpm -q iproute
  iproute-2.4.7-5

 I'm not sure if 2.4.7-5 covers the desired version but here it is:

 ftp://ftp.inr.ac.ru/ip-routing/iproute2-2.4.7-now-ss020116-try.tar.gz

  is this Corect or i need to still upgrade
  if so, i did not find latest than this

 You can always list the above directory for latest tarballs

  thanks
  hare

 Regards

 --
 Julian Anastasov [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 ___
 LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/


___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] Problem With Load Balancing the Links

2002-12-23 Thread Julian Anastasov 

Hello,

On Mon, 23 Dec 2002, hare ram wrote:

 as you have mentioned in the documents, the last time should be default, but
 why iam getting 253 here

Table default (253) is always there but we don't use it
because we want table main before 201 and 202.

 0:  from all lookup local
 50: from all lookup main
 201:from 202.63.96.0/24 lookup 201
 202:from 202.63.111.150/24 lookup 202
 222:from all lookup 222
 32766:  from all lookup main
 32767:  from all lookup 253

 and iam not able to Ping or go out from My gateway IP
 i can only Ping my Gateway IP's

Check the settings again.

 thanks
 hare

Regards

--
Julian Anastasov [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

[LARTC] Problem With Load Balancing the Links

2002-12-22 Thread hare ram 
Hi

iam following the Julian Nano.txt, iam able to setup all
but when i check the following command

[root@pdn root]# ip route list table 222
default  proto static
nexthop via 202.x.x.254  dev eth0 weight 256 dead onlink pervasive
nexthop via 203.x.x.17  dev eth1 weight 1


why iam getting this dead onlink pervasive, the document says i should get
weight 1
what ism doing wrong with this setup
some one suggest me

thanks
hare

___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] Problem With Load Balancing the Links

2002-12-22 Thread Julian Anastasov 

Hello,

On Sun, 22 Dec 2002, hare ram wrote:

 iam following the Julian Nano.txt, iam able to setup all
 but when i check the following command

 [root@pdn root]# ip route list table 222
 default  proto static
 nexthop via 202.x.x.254  dev eth0 weight 256 dead onlink pervasive
 nexthop via 203.x.x.17  dev eth1 weight 1

This smells like one iproute utility bug, just upgrade to iproute2
from Year 2002 which fixes similar problem.

Regards

--
Julian Anastasov [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] Problem With Load Balancing the Links

2002-12-22 Thread hare ram 
Hi

iam using redhat 8.0 with Latest Kernel
2.4.18-18.0
with iproute
[root@pdn root]# rpm -q iproute
iproute-2.4.7-5


is this Corect or i need to still upgrade
if so, i did not find latest than this

thanks
hare
- Original Message -
From: Julian Anastasov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: hare ram [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 22, 2002 10:12 PM
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Problem With Load Balancing the Links



 Hello,

 On Sun, 22 Dec 2002, hare ram wrote:

  iam following the Julian Nano.txt, iam able to setup all
  but when i check the following command
 
  [root@pdn root]# ip route list table 222
  default  proto static
  nexthop via 202.x.x.254  dev eth0 weight 256 dead onlink
pervasive
  nexthop via 203.x.x.17  dev eth1 weight 1

 This smells like one iproute utility bug, just upgrade to iproute2
 from Year 2002 which fixes similar problem.

 Regards

 --
 Julian Anastasov [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 ___
 LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/


___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/