Re: [LARTC] Re: Weird HTB behaviour in 2.6.17
On 7/28/06, Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I can't see any problem there! If this guy expected lower rate for 1:39 class, he should have lower the ceil. This class had much higher traffic then the other class and probably was borrowing just when this stats were prepared. Indeed. In that case, there is no any problem. But I still have a problem here, as you can see in my last post. Regards. -- Marlon ___ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
[LARTC] Re: Weird HTB behaviour in 2.6.17
On 27-07-2006 19:45, Marlon Dutra wrote: Hello, ... http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2005q3/016981.html In that post, there is another guy with the same problem, but with 2.6.11. I can't see any problem there! If this guy expected lower rate for 1:39 class, he should have lower the ceil. This class had much higher traffic then the other class and probably was borrowing just when this stats were prepared. Jarek P. ___ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
