Re: [LARTC] University Project: QoS with Ai
> > > For example there could be p2p users, HTTP users, etc.. and if the queue > > > itself could create classes for those users, maybe increase productivity. > > > What do you think? Am I talking bullocks or it makes some sense? All critics > > > welcome :) > > > > Very good idea, > > I don't know how hard it would be to implement it, though. > > This idea was once my Master Science work proposal. I was crucified by the Phd's > saying that AI does not goes well with packet classifying at high speeds (something > to do with 'too big decision tree'). You can read 'high speeds' like 100+ Mbits > networks. You don't need to make an AI decission for every packet transmited, you just need the AI to sligthly reconfigure your TC setup, based on stats already gathered by the TC system. -- damjan | ÐÐÐÑÐÐ This is my jabber ID --> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <-- not my mail address!!! ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Re: [LARTC] University Project: QoS with Ai
or use this link : http://www.tranexp.com:2000/InterTran?type=url&url=http%3A%2F%2Frainbow.mimuw.edu.pl%2FSR%2Fprace-mgr%2Fkaszynski%2F&text=&from=pol&to=eng adrian > Witam > > There is similar, finished project that also uses concept of neural > networks. > http://rainbow.mimuw.edu.pl/SR/prace-mgr/kaszynski/ > > Unfortunately, this is all in polish. > > > -- > Pozdrawiam > Marcinmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ___ > LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/ > ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Re: [LARTC] University Project: QoS with Ai
Witam There is similar, finished project that also uses concept of neural networks. http://rainbow.mimuw.edu.pl/SR/prace-mgr/kaszynski/ Unfortunately, this is all in polish. -- Pozdrawiam Marcinmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Re: [LARTC] University Project: QoS with Ai
GoMi, For an ongoing project on QoS we looked at something similar but were weary of complex decisions being made at high speeds, particularly as most users questioned would prefer to have a guaranteed equal share of the bandwidth. Currently we are working on a GUI that allows users to mark their traffic as belonging to Gold/Silver or Bronze classes of service. They are then charged appropriately per volume. The results obtained by this approach thus far are quite satisfactory. Regards Brian On 24 Aug 2004 at 18:47, GoMi wrote: > Hi there guys, i am on my last year of career, and as my final Project i am > interested in doing something about QoS. > > The thing is, I have a couple of QoS solutions working, and since the > beginning I though it was great but it lacked some kind of dynamicity. > > Let me explain myself.. I was thinking in creating a classful queue that > based on some parameters (kind of users, bw, packets, etc...) could "learn" > in some way the kind of traffic passing through the box, and change the > parameters of the classes, classifying also not only the packets, but the > users. > > For example there could be p2p users, HTTP users, etc.. and if the queue > itself could create classes for those users, maybe increase productivity. > > > What do you think? Am I talking bullocks or it makes some sense? All critics > welcome :) > > > ___ > LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/ -- Brian Carrig Department of Computing & Networking Institute of Technology, Carlow Tel. No.: +353 59 9176209 ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Re: [LARTC] University Project: QoS with Ai
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 21:18:03 +0200 Damjan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > For example there could be p2p users, HTTP users, etc.. and if the queue > > itself could create classes for those users, maybe increase productivity. > > > > > > What do you think? Am I talking bullocks or it makes some sense? All critics > > welcome :) > > Very good idea, > I don't know how hard it would be to implement it, though. This idea was once my Master Science work proposal. I was crucified by the Phd's saying that AI does not goes well with packet classifying at high speeds (something to do with 'too big decision tree'). You can read 'high speeds' like 100+ Mbits networks. My 2 cents. All the best -- Ethy H. Brito /"\ InterNexo Ltda. \ / CAMPANHA DA FITA ASCII - CONTRA MAIL HTML +55 (12) 3941-6860 X ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN - AGAINST HTML MAIL S.J.Campos - Brasil / \ ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Re: [LARTC] University Project: QoS with Ai
> The thing is, I have a couple of QoS solutions working, and since the > beginning I though it was great but it lacked some kind of dynamicity. > > Let me explain myself.. I was thinking in creating a classful queue that > based on some parameters (kind of users, bw, packets, etc...) could "learn" > in some way the kind of traffic passing through the box, and change the > parameters of the classes, classifying also not only the packets, but the > users. > > For example there could be p2p users, HTTP users, etc.. and if the queue > itself could create classes for those users, maybe increase productivity. > > > What do you think? Am I talking bullocks or it makes some sense? All critics > welcome :) Very good idea, I don't know how hard it would be to implement it, though. -- damjan | ÐÐÐÑÐÐ This is my jabber ID --> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <-- not my mail address!!! ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
[LARTC] University Project: QoS with Ai
Hi there guys, i am on my last year of career, and as my final Project i am interested in doing something about QoS. The thing is, I have a couple of QoS solutions working, and since the beginning I though it was great but it lacked some kind of dynamicity. Let me explain myself.. I was thinking in creating a classful queue that based on some parameters (kind of users, bw, packets, etc...) could "learn" in some way the kind of traffic passing through the box, and change the parameters of the classes, classifying also not only the packets, but the users. For example there could be p2p users, HTTP users, etc.. and if the queue itself could create classes for those users, maybe increase productivity. What do you think? Am I talking bullocks or it makes some sense? All critics welcome :) ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
