1) I want to deploy a box in bridge mode first of
all.
2) I would _want_ to traffic shape based on mac,
not
IP, but this doesnt seem possible. It isnt vital
for me
though, ip will work.
3) I want each ip (well, preferrably MAC, but...)
to
have 3 mbit of bandwidth.
On one level this makes no sense.
Well, I was a bit unclear, or rather unsure of what I
really wanted. I actually want clients that use more
bandwidth to have less priority, which is what wrr can
do.
What if you have more clients than
bandwidth? Clearly you want to lower the 3MB to
bandwidth/#clients.
What if you have extra bandwidth? You probably want
to share the
excess rather than waste the bandwidth. In fact you
probably want to
share the bandwidth dynamically among the active
clients.
All of this is just what's done by SFQ
Interesting. But would SFQ for example, result in low
latency on a heavily used connection for clients that
doesnt use much bandwidth?
---
John Bäckstrand
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/