Re: [LARTC] htb: class isn't work conserving ?!

2004-02-11 Thread Stef Coene
On Monday 09 February 2004 20:50, Patrick Turley wrote:
> I am seeing a lot of messages like this on my console and in
> /var/log/messages:
>
>
>Feb  9 19:27:55 rnsa kernel: htb: class 20001 isn't work conserving ?!
>
>
> The class it's referring to is the only subclass of an HTB qdisc. Can
> anyone tell me why HTB would complain in this way? If I understand
> correctly, HTB isn't a work-conserving qdisc anyway.
I'm not sure, but htb is not a work-conserving qdisc, but the class is work 
conserving.  The htb class will not delay the packet.

Stef

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 "Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
     http://www.docum.org/
     #lartc @ irc.openprojects.net
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/


[LARTC] htb: class isn't work conserving ?!

2004-02-09 Thread Patrick Turley
I am seeing a lot of messages like this on my console and in 
/var/log/messages:

  Feb  9 19:27:55 rnsa kernel: htb: class 20001 isn't work conserving ?!

The class it's referring to is the only subclass of an HTB qdisc. Can 
anyone tell me why HTB would complain in this way? If I understand 
correctly, HTB isn't a work-conserving qdisc anyway.
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/