Re: [LARTC] htb v3 not as good as htb v2?
Anton Yurchenko wrote: Hello, I`ve been using htb v2 for more then a year without any major problems. Recently I needed to upgrade to newer kernel becouse of non LARTC related issues. After installing 2.4.22 when the htb qdisc was attached to the interface even without any rules, I was not able to send more ~1mbit through the interface. After I reversed the htb3 patch and rebuild with htb2 everything works as normal. Has anyone experienced the same issue? thanks check your burst and quantum settings. maybe they are too low. bye, wilfried ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Re: [LARTC] htb v3 not as good as htb v2?
On Thursday 09 October 2003 10:44, Anton Yurchenko wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >Hello Anton, > > > >Wednesday, October 8, 2003, 4:49:30 PM, you wrote: > > > >I am using HTB3 with more than 10 megabits customers, and > >amount of classes about 100-200 without any problem. > >Only one what i do - i make filter with lowest priority, to not pass > >ass unclassified traffic to default class, just to drop it. I think > >you just need review your classes, because also if you have any rate > >more 468 Kbit, you need change r2q or quantum. > > the problem was observed even when only adding a qdisc, no classes. how > can this be? What's the output of tc -s -d qdisc show dev eth0 tc -s -d class show dev eth0 Stef -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Using Linux as bandwidth manager" http://www.docum.org/ #lartc @ irc.openprojects.net ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Re: [LARTC] htb v3 not as good as htb v2?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Anton, Wednesday, October 8, 2003, 4:49:30 PM, you wrote: I am using HTB3 with more than 10 megabits customers, and amount of classes about 100-200 without any problem. Only one what i do - i make filter with lowest priority, to not pass ass unclassified traffic to default class, just to drop it. I think you just need review your classes, because also if you have any rate more 468 Kbit, you need change r2q or quantum. the problem was observed even when only adding a qdisc, no classes. how can this be? AY> Hello, AY> I`ve been using htb v2 for more then a year without any major problems. AY> Recently I needed to upgrade to newer kernel becouse of non LARTC AY> related issues. After installing 2.4.22 when the htb qdisc was attached AY> to the interface even without any rules, I was not able to send more AY> ~1mbit through the interface. After I reversed the htb3 patch and AY> rebuild with htb2 everything works as normal. Has anyone experienced the AY> same issue? thanks -- Anton Yurchenko<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Digital Generation ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Re: [LARTC] htb v3 not as good as htb v2?
I've used HTB and CBQ to protect MPEG2 traffic streams from UDP traffic over 100 Mb/s interfaces. I have not yet attempted this with 1000 Mb/s interfaces, but I hope to get to that this year (it it much more difficult to measure accurately at this speed). On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 09:49, Anton Yurchenko wrote: > Hello, > > I`ve been using htb v2 for more then a year without any major problems. > Recently I needed to upgrade to newer kernel becouse of non LARTC > related issues. After installing 2.4.22 when the htb qdisc was attached > to the interface even without any rules, I was not able to send more > ~1mbit through the interface. After I reversed the htb3 patch and > rebuild with htb2 everything works as normal. Has anyone experienced the > same issue? thanks -- Lawrence MacIntyre 865.574.8696 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Oak Ridge National Laboratory High Performance Information Infrastructure Technology Group signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [LARTC] htb v3 not as good as htb v2?
Hello Anton, Wednesday, October 8, 2003, 4:49:30 PM, you wrote: I am using HTB3 with more than 10 megabits customers, and amount of classes about 100-200 without any problem. Only one what i do - i make filter with lowest priority, to not pass ass unclassified traffic to default class, just to drop it. I think you just need review your classes, because also if you have any rate more 468 Kbit, you need change r2q or quantum. AY> Hello, AY> I`ve been using htb v2 for more then a year without any major problems. AY> Recently I needed to upgrade to newer kernel becouse of non LARTC AY> related issues. After installing 2.4.22 when the htb qdisc was attached AY> to the interface even without any rules, I was not able to send more AY> ~1mbit through the interface. After I reversed the htb3 patch and AY> rebuild with htb2 everything works as normal. Has anyone experienced the AY> same issue? thanks -- Best regards, Denismailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
[LARTC] htb v3 not as good as htb v2?
Hello, I`ve been using htb v2 for more then a year without any major problems. Recently I needed to upgrade to newer kernel becouse of non LARTC related issues. After installing 2.4.22 when the htb qdisc was attached to the interface even without any rules, I was not able to send more ~1mbit through the interface. After I reversed the htb3 patch and rebuild with htb2 everything works as normal. Has anyone experienced the same issue? thanks -- Anton Yurchenko<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Digital Generation ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
