Re: [LARTC] queue placing
yes, I thought so thanks...On 12/27/05, Denis Ovsienko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My question is, if I QOS the traffic on the LINUX-ROUTER going out> from the LAN towards the frame relay cloud, and this traffic is> re-queued on the CISCO-ROUTER ... this would make all of my shapping If you don't configure QoS at cisco router, it will process packets on aFIFO basis. ___ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
Re: [LARTC] queue placing
> My question is, if I QOS the traffic on the LINUX-ROUTER going out > from the LAN towards the frame relay cloud, and this traffic is > re-queued on the CISCO-ROUTER ... this would make all of my shapping If you don't configure QoS at cisco router, it will process packets on a FIFO basis. -- DO4-UANIC ___ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
[LARTC] queue placing
Hi all: I have this network diagram:FRAME RELAY CLOUD<>CISCO-ROUTER <---LAN--->ROUTER-LINUX<-LAN>>> Between the CISCO and the LINUX routers there is a small LAN (+-5 IP's).My question is, if I QOS the traffic on the LINUX-ROUTER going out from the LAN towards the frame relay cloud, and this traffic is re-queued on the CISCO-ROUTER ... this would make all of my shapping worthless ??This is because other traffic + traffic coming from de LINUX-ROUTER would be entering on the CISCO.Thanks in advance.Best regards.-- Janis Bistevins >Belief is 9/10 of YOUR reality< ___ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
