[LARTC] routing query again
Hi, I have a small routing query again. Same question but asking in simple language. Can I use, route add -net default gw 192.168.10.1 route add -net default gw 192.168.10.2 Where 192.168.10.1 and 192.168.10.2 are internal IPs of two different ISPs routers. And assume that random routing is enabled? I would like to mention that this time both default IPs are internal IPs connected to external world. I am not still clear on real use of multiple default gateways, so please excuse. With warm regards, -Payal -- Visit GNU/Linux Success Stories http://payal.staticky.com Guest-Book Section Updated. ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Re: [LARTC] routing query
route add -net 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 br2 once i have that, i apply the following tc qdisc add dev br2 root handle 3: htb default 11 tc class add dev br2 parent 3: classid 3:1 htb rate 10mbit tc class add dev br2 parent 3:1 classid 3:10 htb rate 9990kbit ceil 10mbit tc class add dev br2 parent 3:1 classid 3:11 htb rate 10kbit ceil 25kbit tc qdisc add dev br2 parent 3:10 handle 30: sfq tc qdisc add dev br2 parent 3:11 handle 31: sfq tc filter add dev br2 protocol ip parent 3: handle 5 fw classid 3:10 ebtables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth2 -p IPV4 -d 00:30:65:17:71:8f -j mark --set-mark 5 please note that the ebtables is being applied to eth2. when i set this up, all traffic destined for 00:30:65:17:71:8f, i think, is being marked as the --Lc count is increasing. however, when i do a tc -s qdisc show dev br2 it looks like all the packets are going into queue 11, which is the 10kbit class. if somebody could shed some light on this problem, i would greatly appreciate it. r --__--__-- Message: 4 Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2003 21:20:24 -0500 (COT) From: Randolph Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Damjan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Lartc List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [LARTC] (no subject) Seem you want to achieve somekind of concave service curve but with terrible times, maybe you could try to do it some way the HFSC queuer does but definitly not in a script or using HTB, HTB uses a linear service curve as a Token Bucket actually does, you should try using the linux port of the HFSC made by Alex Goldney you can find further info here http://members.optushome.com.au/agoldney/ HFSC is intented for delay bounding, but I think you could do some strange arragments to achieve what u say. Tell me if u get it. You're not drunk if you can lie on the floor without holding on. -- Dean Martin last night. --__--__-- Message: 5 Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2003 08:03:46 +0530 From: Payal Rathod [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [LARTC] routing query Hi, I have a simple question. I asked a friend about it but he was also not clear. So, I thought of mailing the list. I have a linux box (RH 7.2) which will have 2 net cards. I have 2 types of connections to that box. One RF at eth0 and 1 ISDN at eth1. Now I told 10 people from the company to give eth1 as their default gateway and the rest as eth0. Ok, so far? Now my understanding that with the routing table below, all traffic coming to eth0 will be routed thru' RF router and all traffic coming to eth1 will be routed through ISDN router. Am I right? S, if ISDN fails only 10 people will suffer but the rest can continue using RF line. Same case with RF line, if it fails the 10 people can use ISDN without any glitch. This is no load balancing network. Just a simple routing decision. I have, route add default gw ISDN router ip dev eth1 route add default gw RF router ip dev eth0 Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface 127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo 125.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth1 125.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth1 default 203.124.123.111 0.0.0.0 UG0 0 0 eth0 default 125.125.125.3 0.0.0.0 UG0 0 0 eth1 default * 0.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 Can anyone comment whether I am right in my analysis? My friend's comments are given below, | I still say that should be necessary. I believe you need to echo 0 | at some files found by /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/*/send_redirects. | Otherwise devices won't route through your box, they'll be | redirected straight to one of the routers (at random, as far as I | know). With warm regards, -Payal -- Regards, Manish Singh Software Engineer Consilnet India Pvt Ltd Ph: 011 26868293/94/95 ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Re: [LARTC] routing query
, when i do a tc -s qdisc show dev br2 it looks like all the packets are going into queue 11, which is the 10kbit class. if somebody could shed some light on this problem, i would greatly appreciate it. r --__--__-- Message: 4 Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2003 21:20:24 -0500 (COT) From: Randolph Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Damjan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Lartc List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [LARTC] (no subject) Seem you want to achieve somekind of concave service curve but with terrible times, maybe you could try to do it some way the HFSC queuer does but definitly not in a script or using HTB, HTB uses a linear service curve as a Token Bucket actually does, you should try using the linux port of the HFSC made by Alex Goldney you can find further info here http://members.optushome.com.au/agoldney/ HFSC is intented for delay bounding, but I think you could do some strange arragments to achieve what u say. Tell me if u get it. You're not drunk if you can lie on the floor without holding on. -- Dean Martin last night. --__--__-- Message: 5 Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2003 08:03:46 +0530 From: Payal Rathod [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [LARTC] routing query Hi, I have a simple question. I asked a friend about it but he was also not clear. So, I thought of mailing the list. I have a linux box (RH 7.2) which will have 2 net cards. I have 2 types of connections to that box. One RF at eth0 and 1 ISDN at eth1. Now I told 10 people from the company to give eth1 as their default gateway and the rest as eth0. Ok, so far? Now my understanding that with the routing table below, all traffic coming to eth0 will be routed thru' RF router and all traffic coming to eth1 will be routed through ISDN router. Am I right? S, if ISDN fails only 10 people will suffer but the rest can continue using RF line. Same case with RF line, if it fails the 10 people can use ISDN without any glitch. This is no load balancing network. Just a simple routing decision. I have, route add default gw ISDN router ip dev eth1 route add default gw RF router ip dev eth0 Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface 127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo 125.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth1 125.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth1 default 203.124.123.111 0.0.0.0 UG0 0 0 eth0 default 125.125.125.3 0.0.0.0 UG0 0 0 eth1 default * 0.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 Can anyone comment whether I am right in my analysis? My friend's comments are given below, | I still say that should be necessary. I believe you need to echo 0 | at some files found by /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/*/send_redirects. | Otherwise devices won't route through your box, they'll be | redirected straight to one of the routers (at random, as far as I | know). With warm regards, -Payal -- Regards, Manish Singh Software Engineer Consilnet India Pvt Ltd Ph: 011 26868293/94/95 ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Re: [LARTC] routing query
Payal: What subnet are your users' machines on? Is there a third ethernet address on the linux machine where the user machines connect or are they connected to one of the two given ethernet interfaces (eth0 or eth1)? On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 22:33, Payal Rathod wrote: Hi, I have a simple question. I asked a friend about it but he was also not clear. So, I thought of mailing the list. I have a linux box (RH 7.2) which will have 2 net cards. I have 2 types of connections to that box. One RF at eth0 and 1 ISDN at eth1. Now I told 10 people from the company to give eth1 as their default gateway and the rest as eth0. Ok, so far? Now my understanding that with the routing table below, all traffic coming to eth0 will be routed thru' RF router and all traffic coming to eth1 will be routed through ISDN router. Am I right? S, if ISDN fails only 10 people will suffer but the rest can continue using RF line. Same case with RF line, if it fails the 10 people can use ISDN without any glitch. This is no load balancing network. Just a simple routing decision. I have, route add default gw ISDN router ip dev eth1 route add default gw RF router ip dev eth0 Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface 127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 00 lo 125.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 00 eth1 125.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 00 eth1 default 203.124.123.111 0.0.0.0 UG0 00 eth0 default 125.125.125.3 0.0.0.0 UG0 00 eth1 default * 0.0.0.0 U 0 00 eth0 Can anyone comment whether I am right in my analysis? My friend's comments are given below, | I still say that should be necessary. I believe you need to echo 0 | at some files found by /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/*/send_redirects. | Otherwise devices won't route through your box, they'll be | redirected straight to one of the routers (at random, as far as I | know). With warm regards, -Payal signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [LARTC] routing query
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 01:33:29PM -0400, Lawrence MacIntyre wrote: Payal: What subnet are your users' machines on? Is there a third ethernet address on the linux machine where the user machines connect or are they connected to one of the two given ethernet interfaces (eth0 or eth1)? All machines are 125.125.125.0/24. They are either connected t eth0 r eth1. HTH, -Payal On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 22:33, Payal Rathod wrote: Hi, I have a simple question. I asked a friend about it but he was also not clear. So, I thought of mailing the list. I have a linux box (RH 7.2) which will have 2 net cards. I have 2 types of connections to that box. One RF at eth0 and 1 ISDN at eth1. Now I told 10 people from the company to give eth1 as their default gateway and the rest as eth0. Ok, so far? Now my understanding that with the routing table below, all traffic coming to eth0 will be routed thru' RF router and all traffic coming to eth1 will be routed through ISDN router. Am I right? S, if ISDN fails only 10 people will suffer but the rest can continue using RF line. Same case with RF line, if it fails the 10 people can use ISDN without any glitch. This is no load balancing network. Just a simple routing decision. I have, route add default gw ISDN router ip dev eth1 route add default gw RF router ip dev eth0 Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface 127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 00 lo 125.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 00 eth1 125.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 00 eth1 default 203.124.123.111 0.0.0.0 UG0 00 eth0 default 125.125.125.3 0.0.0.0 UG0 00 eth1 default * 0.0.0.0 U 0 00 eth0 Can anyone comment whether I am right in my analysis? My friend's comments are given below, | I still say that should be necessary. I believe you need to echo 0 | at some files found by /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/*/send_redirects. | Otherwise devices won't route through your box, they'll be | redirected straight to one of the routers (at random, as far as I | know). With warm regards, -Payal -- For GNU/Linux Success Stories and Articles visit: http://payal.staticky.com ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
[LARTC] routing query
Hi, I have a simple question. I asked a friend about it but he was also not clear. So, I thought of mailing the list. I have a linux box (RH 7.2) which will have 2 net cards. I have 2 types of connections to that box. One RF at eth0 and 1 ISDN at eth1. Now I told 10 people from the company to give eth1 as their default gateway and the rest as eth0. Ok, so far? Now my understanding that with the routing table below, all traffic coming to eth0 will be routed thru' RF router and all traffic coming to eth1 will be routed through ISDN router. Am I right? S, if ISDN fails only 10 people will suffer but the rest can continue using RF line. Same case with RF line, if it fails the 10 people can use ISDN without any glitch. This is no load balancing network. Just a simple routing decision. I have, route add default gw ISDN router ip dev eth1 route add default gw RF router ip dev eth0 Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface 127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 00 lo 125.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 00 eth1 125.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 00 eth1 default 203.124.123.111 0.0.0.0 UG0 00 eth0 default 125.125.125.3 0.0.0.0 UG0 00 eth1 default * 0.0.0.0 U 0 00 eth0 Can anyone comment whether I am right in my analysis? My friend's comments are given below, | I still say that should be necessary. I believe you need to echo 0 | at some files found by /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/*/send_redirects. | Otherwise devices won't route through your box, they'll be | redirected straight to one of the routers (at random, as far as I | know). With warm regards, -Payal -- Visit GNU/Linux Success Stories http://payal.staticky.com Guest-Book Section Updated. ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
