Send LARTC mailing list submissions to
lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of LARTC digest...
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Sip Traffic (sophana)
2. Re: Sip Traffic (Suresh Babu)
3. Usubscribe ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
4. Re: Sip Traffic (sophana)
5. HTB - Rate errors (Luke McConnell)
6. Re: Sip Traffic (Marius Corici)
7. Re: HTB - Rate errors (Luciano Ruete)
8. trying to get time control working (William Bohannan)
9. trying to get time working - had error in first email
(William Bohannan)
10. how to change classful netem loss probability? (George Nychis)
--
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 16:26:27 +0200
From: sophana [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Sip Traffic
To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
what about using a sip proxy?
I'm not sure, but the rtp traffic goes though the sip proxy does it?
then you can prioritize traffic with the sip proxy process user id
(assuming that you can have a proxy on your router)
I have a much more basic question:
I installed a qos script based on wondershaper, which is htb based.
With voip, the result is not correct (I've lot of bandwidth with max prio)
How can I mix absolute priority (for voip) with htb?
Thanks
LinuXKiD wrote:
Hi.
there is a way to MARK udp VOIP (SIP) traffic,
in order to put in a highest prio class ?
Traffic flow seems start on udp 5060 port, but
next both server and client seems jump to a
random(?) port.
I can't use CONNMARK because is udp traffic.
I only see a pattern for L7 patch in order to
SIP traffic identification , but I run 2.4
kernel series .
When you patch 2.4 kernel with L7 patch,
later, Connmark (patch o matic ) can't apply.
(conflicts)
thank you.
--
Andres
___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
--
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 20:25:58 +0530
From: Suresh Babu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Sip Traffic
To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
Message-ID:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
I think RTP traffic doesn`t flow through SIP proxy. Only SIP packets flows
through SIP proxy and RTP traffic flows end to end.
correct me if i`m not.
Regards,
Suresh Babu
On 4/26/06, sophana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what about using a sip proxy?
I'm not sure, but the rtp traffic goes though the sip proxy does it?
then you can prioritize traffic with the sip proxy process user id
(assuming that you can have a proxy on your router)
I have a much more basic question:
I installed a qos script based on wondershaper, which is htb based.
With voip, the result is not correct (I've lot of bandwidth with max
prio)
How can I mix absolute priority (for voip) with htb?
Thanks
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/attachments/20060426/2cd53d4f/attachment-0001.htm
--
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 09:43:45 -0600 (MDT)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [LARTC] Usubscribe
To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
Message-ID:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
--
Message: 4
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 18:01:17 +0200
From: sophana [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Sip Traffic
To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Suresh Babu wrote:
I think RTP traffic doesn`t flow through SIP proxy. Only SIP packets
flows through SIP proxy and RTP traffic flows end to end.
correct me if i`m not.
would it depend on the kind of sip proxy?
I thought that one of the sip proxy functions was to resolve rtp NAT
problems.
I have a much more basic question:
I installed a qos script based on wondershaper, which is htb based.
With voip, the result is not correct (I've lot of bandwidth with
max prio)
How can I mix absolute priority (for voip) with htb?
Thanks
can someone please answer that (surely basic) question?
What structure should I have?
prio on top?
--
Message: 5
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 17:00:38 +0100
From: Luke McConnell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [LARTC] HTB - Rate errors
To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
Message-ID:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain;
