Hi !
Luciano: thanks for your posts on lugmen.org.ar and lartc!
I've read all of them, and I've a question:
What diferrence bewtween this:
-> ip ro add default NEXTHOP via x.x.x.x dev eth1 weight 1 \
NEXTHOP via y.y.y.y dev eth2
and this:
-> ip route add x.x.x.x MPATH RR via y.y.y.y via z.z.z.z
I work with 2.4 Kernel Series. Is connvenient upgrade to 2.6 ?
Other question about this:
iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j CONNMARK --set-mark 0x1
iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -o eth1 -j CONNMARK --set-mark 0x2
My problem is that I use CONNMARK's marks in order to mark P2P traffic.
Can I've a way to have diferents mark with CONNMARK ?
Thank you!!
Andres.
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
