Re: [LARTC] htb: class 10007 isn't work conserving ?!
Yes, that's what I was trying to ask below. I'm still trying to figure out which class (in the : format) the error message is referring to. It's about class 1:7. So, since I'm not sure which class it is (and I have several htb qdiscs; oh, I just realized that I neglected to mention that I'm using HTB), I'm not sure which qdisc this refers to. I [think I] understand that htb is a non-work-conserving qdisc, and I [think I] have configured things so that every htb qdisc I instantiate limits the bandwidth, so I don't understand why this situation would invoke a warning message. Also -- is there some way to correlate this identifier "10007" with a classid? I'm just starting back on working on this problem this morning, and I'll approach it via a process of elimination, but I just thought there surely must be some sort of deterministic mapping between the : label and this one given in the warning message. Thank you -- Glen -- ** Glen W. Mabey [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mabeys.homelinux.com/glen/ ** --- Catalin(ux aka Dino) BOIE catab at deuroconsult.ro http://kernel.umbrella.ro/ ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Re: [LARTC] htb: class 10007 isn't work conserving ?!
On Mon, Jul 05, 2004 at 09:18:11AM +0300, Catalin BOIE wrote: > On Fri, 2 Jul 2004, Glen Mabey wrote: > > >I'm getting the following error/warning at some point in my config > >script, and I'm not sure which class it is referring to. > > > >htb: class 10007 isn't work conserving ?! > > What qdisc is attached to this class? Yes, that's what I was trying to ask below. I'm still trying to figure out which class (in the : format) the error message is referring to. So, since I'm not sure which class it is (and I have several htb qdiscs; oh, I just realized that I neglected to mention that I'm using HTB), I'm not sure which qdisc this refers to. > >I [think I] understand that htb is a non-work-conserving qdisc, and I > >[think I] have configured things so that every htb qdisc I instantiate > >limits the bandwidth, so I don't understand why this situation would > >invoke a warning message. > > > >Also -- is there some way to correlate this identifier "10007" with a > >classid? I'm just starting back on working on this problem this morning, and I'll approach it via a process of elimination, but I just thought there surely must be some sort of deterministic mapping between the : label and this one given in the warning message. Thank you -- Glen -- ** Glen W. Mabey [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mabeys.homelinux.com/glen/ ** ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Re: [LARTC] htb: class 10007 isn't work conserving ?!
Our ISP has given us 5 static IP address plus one router IP address and I was wondering if I could get rid of their stupid EN5861 router and set up the linux machine to handle all the static addresses and routing. I figured I'd have to set up alises for other IP addresses eg ifconfig eth0:0 xx.xx.xx.193 but once I've done that I've found out I cant use ip route to configure it eg ip route add default dev eth0:0 table server. Whats the best way to go about this? Cheers. By the way I'm running redhat 9 with two adsl connections, on is a speedtouch USB modem and the other is the EN5861 router. I'm not quite sure why you tagged this on to the end of a thread about htb classes? As a result many people may not even read your question...? I have one of those EN5861 router things, and actually I find it pretty good. The biggest issue is that it's a bit of a timebomb, the powersupply dies after a few years, and unless you have a spare it's a bit of a weak link Do you need to do some particularly advanced routing that's stopping you just using the en5861? Good luck Ed W ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
RE: [LARTC] htb: class 10007 isn't work conserving ?!
Hi all, Our ISP has given us 5 static IP address plus one router IP address and I was wondering if I could get rid of their stupid EN5861 router and set up the linux machine to handle all the static addresses and routing. I figured I'd have to set up alises for other IP addresses eg ifconfig eth0:0 xx.xx.xx.193 but once I've done that I've found out I cant use ip route to configure it eg ip route add default dev eth0:0 table server. Whats the best way to go about this? Cheers. By the way I'm running redhat 9 with two adsl connections, on is a speedtouch USB modem and the other is the EN5861 router. ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Re: [LARTC] htb: class 10007 isn't work conserving ?!
On Fri, 2 Jul 2004, Glen Mabey wrote: I'm getting the following error/warning at some point in my config script, and I'm not sure which class it is referring to. htb: class 10007 isn't work conserving ?! What qdisc is attached to this class? I [think I] understand that htb is a non-work-conserving qdisc, and I [think I] have configured things so that every htb qdisc I instantiate limits the bandwidth, so I don't understand why this situation would invoke a warning message. Also -- is there some way to correlate this identifier "10007" with a classid? Thank you, Glen Mabey -- ** Glen W. Mabey [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mabeys.homelinux.com/glen/ ** ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/ --- Catalin(ux aka Dino) BOIE catab at deuroconsult.ro http://kernel.umbrella.ro/ ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
