Re: [LARTC] Bandwidth allocation by IP
Well, I took 0.2 version, I compiled it as a module - no problem. tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1: esfq hash dst - ok but then I started in one moment to upload (via eth1 of course) 3 scp's. The first 2 were uploading on ip A and the third was uploading on ip B. But all those three threads were uploading with eqaul rate. Either I missed something (it's not so rare) or something went wrong... what do you thing? root:/usr/src# tc -s qdisc show dev eth1 qdisc esfq 1: quantum 1514b hash: dst Sent 5615415 bytes 4513 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) - Original Message - From: Alexander Atanasov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Vladimir Trebicky [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 4:47 AM Subject: Re: [LARTC] Bandwidth allocation by IP Hi there! On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, Vladimir Trebicky wrote: Sorry for my incompetence. I didn't noticed that readme included in some of Alexes posts. Module works fine only if I do qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1: esfq when I do qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1: esfq hash dst the computer get totally freezed. Are you sure you've build the kernel correct? I've fixed some things about default parameters - i think you've hit this, hash_divisor was left to be 0 when not supplied as parameter. Now works and as built in - forgot to include sch_api.c when making diff first time, so it was in kernel but not registerd. I've setup a page for it on: http://www.ssi.bg/~alex/esfq/index.html -- have fun, alex ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/ --- Odchozi zprava neobsahuje viry. Zkontrolováno antivirovým systémem AVG (http://www.grisoft.cz). Verze: 6.0.368 / Virová báze: 204 - datum vydání: 29.5.2002 ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Re: [LARTC] Bandwidth allocation by IP
Try WRR on eth1 see http://wipl-wrr.sourceforge.net/ for details or use ESFQ see mail from Alexander Atanasov 05.06.2002 I rename files gzip its and attach to this mail but don't change anything patch kernel and tc cd iproute2 patch -p1 ../esfq-tc.diff cd linux-2.4.18 patch -p1 ../esfq-2.4.18.diff recompile kernel and tc thats all !! see README Note it give you equal division for a long term not at the moment Example: tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1:0 esfq hash src It make equal priority for session based on ip address not tcp session like classic SFQ For detail see SFQ 05.06.2002 15:34:05, Vladimir Trebicky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a LAN (eth1) and 1Mbit internet which is very unstable (from 100kbit - 2mbit) on eth0. I would like to prevent ip A downloading with 9 threads taking 90% bandwidth and ip B downloading with 1 thread taking 10%. I would like ip A as well as ip B to have each 50% of bandwith no care how many threads they are downloading. I suppose that it could be done on eth1. But how? Second problem: I want to lessen round-trips. Should I do it with priorizing small packets on eth0? How? I have 2.4.18, iproute2 with extra htb. PSCHED_JIFFIES (unfortunately - it's only AMD 160MHz and does not have TSC) Thanks -- Vladimir Trebicky [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Odchozi zprava neobsahuje viry. Zkontrolovno antivirovm systmem AVG (http://www.grisoft.cz). Verze: 6.0.368 / Virov bze: 204 - datum vydn: 29.5.2002 ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/ --- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] BR Alexey Talikov FORTEK --- esfq.tar.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data
Re: [LARTC] Bandwidth allocation by IP
Hi there! On Wed, 05 Jun 2002 16:19:41 +0500 Alexey Talikov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I rename files gzip its and attach to this mail but don't change anything patch kernel and tc I'll put them somewhere on the web tonight and provide an url. Note it give you equal division for a long term not at the moment Example: tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1:0 esfq hash src It make equal priority for session based on ip address not tcp session like classic SFQ For detail see SFQ Note that sfq is on egress and client IPs are destinations, not sources, so you should use dst hash to divide bandwidth between clients, if you use src hash you have equal priority on server flows not on clients ones: client A downloads from server X and from server Y, client B downloads from server Z - you have bandwidth devided to X:Y:Z, not A:B, since downloads are coming from X/Y/Z(source) to A/B(destination). -- have fun, alex P.S. Thank you for the feedback and trying it. :) ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Re: [LARTC] Bandwidth allocation by IP
use latest version iproute2-2.4.7-now-ss020116-try it work without problem (for me) esfq is more simple in configuration that wrr but in wrr more features for traffic control and its use another principle read more about WRR and also see doc in package wrr and see http://docum.org/. 05.06.2002 18:09:07, Vladimir Trebicky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That sound like something what I exactly need. 1) what is the difference (adv disadv) between esfq and wrr? 2) little problem in attachment, I don't know what to do. I tried latest (that 2002-try) and latest stable version (ss010824). Try WRR on eth1 see http://wipl-wrr.sourceforge.net/ for details or use ESFQ see mail from Alexander Atanasov 05.06.2002 I rename files gzip its and attach to this mail but don't change anything patch kernel and tc cd iproute2 patch -p1 ../esfq-tc.diff cd linux-2.4.18 patch -p1 ../esfq-2.4.18.diff recompile kernel and tc thats all !! see README Note it give you equal division for a long term not at the moment Example: tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1:0 esfq hash src It make equal priority for session based on ip address not tcp session like classic SFQ For detail see SFQ 05.06.2002 15:34:05, Vladimir Trebicky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a LAN (eth1) and 1Mbit internet which is very unstable (from 100kbit - 2mbit) on eth0. I would like to prevent ip A downloading with 9 threads taking 90% bandwidth and ip B downloading with 1 thread taking 10%. I would like ip A as well as ip B to have each 50% of bandwith no care how many threads they are downloading. I suppose that it could be done on eth1. But how? Second problem: I want to lessen round-trips. Should I do it with priorizing small packets on eth0? How? I have 2.4.18, iproute2 with extra htb. PSCHED_JIFFIES (unfortunately - it's only AMD 160MHz and does not have TSC) Thanks -- Vladimir Trebicky [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Odchozi zprava neobsahuje viry. Zkontrolov?no antivirov?m syst?mem AVG (http://www.grisoft.cz). Verze: 6.0.368 / Virov? b?ze: 204 - datum vyd?n?: 29.5.2002 ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/ --- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] BR Alexey Talikov FORTEK --- --- Odchozi zprava neobsahuje viry. Zkontrolov?no antivirov?m syst?mem AVG (http://www.grisoft.cz). Verze: 6.0.368 / Virov? b?ze: 204 - datum vyd?n?: 29.5.2002 --- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] BR Alexey Talikov FORTEK --- ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Re: [LARTC] Bandwidth allocation by IP
ESFQ !? Did I missed something ? :-) devik On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, Alexey Talikov wrote: use latest version iproute2-2.4.7-now-ss020116-try it work without problem (for me) esfq is more simple in configuration that wrr but in wrr more features for traffic control and its use another principle read more about WRR and also see doc in package wrr and see http://docum.org/. 05.06.2002 18:09:07, Vladimir Trebicky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That sound like something what I exactly need. 1) what is the difference (adv disadv) between esfq and wrr? 2) little problem in attachment, I don't know what to do. I tried latest (that 2002-try) and latest stable version (ss010824). Try WRR on eth1 see http://wipl-wrr.sourceforge.net/ for details or use ESFQ see mail from Alexander Atanasov 05.06.2002 I rename files gzip its and attach to this mail but don't change anything patch kernel and tc cd iproute2 patch -p1 ../esfq-tc.diff cd linux-2.4.18 patch -p1 ../esfq-2.4.18.diff recompile kernel and tc thats all !! see README Note it give you equal division for a long term not at the moment Example: tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1:0 esfq hash src It make equal priority for session based on ip address not tcp session like classic SFQ For detail see SFQ 05.06.2002 15:34:05, Vladimir Trebicky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a LAN (eth1) and 1Mbit internet which is very unstable (from 100kbit - 2mbit) on eth0. I would like to prevent ip A downloading with 9 threads taking 90% bandwidth and ip B downloading with 1 thread taking 10%. I would like ip A as well as ip B to have each 50% of bandwith no care how many threads they are downloading. I suppose that it could be done on eth1. But how? Second problem: I want to lessen round-trips. Should I do it with priorizing small packets on eth0? How? I have 2.4.18, iproute2 with extra htb. PSCHED_JIFFIES (unfortunately - it's only AMD 160MHz and does not have TSC) Thanks -- Vladimir Trebicky [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Odchozi zprava neobsahuje viry. Zkontrolov?no antivirov?m syst?mem AVG (http://www.grisoft.cz). Verze: 6.0.368 / Virov? b?ze: 204 - datum vyd?n?: 29.5.2002 ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/ --- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] BR Alexey Talikov FORTEK --- --- Odchozi zprava neobsahuje viry. Zkontrolov?no antivirov?m syst?mem AVG (http://www.grisoft.cz). Verze: 6.0.368 / Virov? b?ze: 204 - datum vyd?n?: 29.5.2002 --- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] BR Alexey Talikov FORTEK --- ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/ ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Re: [LARTC] Bandwidth allocation by IP
Sorry for my incompetence. I didn't noticed that readme included in some of Alexes posts. Module works fine only if I do qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1: esfq when I do qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1: esfq hash dst the computer get totally freezed. - Original Message - From: Alexey Talikov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Vladimir Trebicky [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 1:19 PM Subject: Re: [LARTC] Bandwidth allocation by IP Try WRR on eth1 see http://wipl-wrr.sourceforge.net/ for details or use ESFQ see mail from Alexander Atanasov 05.06.2002 I rename files gzip its and attach to this mail but don't change anything patch kernel and tc cd iproute2 patch -p1 ../esfq-tc.diff cd linux-2.4.18 patch -p1 ../esfq-2.4.18.diff recompile kernel and tc thats all !! see README Note it give you equal division for a long term not at the moment Example: tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1:0 esfq hash src It make equal priority for session based on ip address not tcp session like classic SFQ For detail see SFQ 05.06.2002 15:34:05, Vladimir Trebicky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a LAN (eth1) and 1Mbit internet which is very unstable (from 100kbit - 2mbit) on eth0. I would like to prevent ip A downloading with 9 threads taking 90% bandwidth and ip B downloading with 1 thread taking 10%. I would like ip A as well as ip B to have each 50% of bandwith no care how many threads they are downloading. I suppose that it could be done on eth1. But how? Second problem: I want to lessen round-trips. Should I do it with priorizing small packets on eth0? How? I have 2.4.18, iproute2 with extra htb. PSCHED_JIFFIES (unfortunately - it's only AMD 160MHz and does not have TSC) Thanks -- Vladimir Trebicky [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Odchozi zprava neobsahuje viry. Zkontrolovno antivirovm systmem AVG (http://www.grisoft.cz). Verze: 6.0.368 / Virov bze: 204 - datum vydn: 29.5.2002 ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/ --- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] BR Alexey Talikov FORTEK --- --- Odchozi zprava neobsahuje viry. Zkontrolovno antivirovm systmem AVG (http://www.grisoft.cz). Verze: 6.0.368 / Virov bze: 204 - datum vydn: 29.5.2002 ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Re: [LARTC] Bandwidth allocation by IP
Hi there! On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, Vladimir Trebicky wrote: Sorry for my incompetence. I didn't noticed that readme included in some of Alexes posts. Module works fine only if I do qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1: esfq when I do qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1: esfq hash dst the computer get totally freezed. Are you sure you've build the kernel correct? I've fixed some things about default parameters - i think you've hit this, hash_divisor was left to be 0 when not supplied as parameter. Now works and as built in - forgot to include sch_api.c when making diff first time, so it was in kernel but not registerd. I've setup a page for it on: http://www.ssi.bg/~alex/esfq/index.html -- have fun, alex ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
