Re: [LARTC] HTB: Two OOPSes fixed (wrong subject above - sorry)

[Kabelweb]

On Wednesday 10 December 2003 10:57, Ben Efros wrote:
 The answer is in your own email

   Patch against
   2.4.23 and 2.6.0-test10 is here

Thank you but I was asking for a good reason: The only significant change in 
the patch itself is commented as follows:

+   /* This line used to be after htb_destroy_class call below
+  and surprisingly it worked in 2.4. But it must precede it 
+  because filter need its target class alive to be able to call
+  unbind_filter on it (without Oops). */
+   htb_destroy_filters(q-filter_list);

Therefore I wanted to know whether the Ooopses fixed by the patch are known to 
be possible with 2.4 as well or not. I am currently trying to find the cause 
for very rare hangups (about once in two months) on a production server which 
heavily uses htb.

Anyone with first-hand experience?

Best regards,

Andreas
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] HTB: Two OOPSes fixed

[Kabelweb]

On Sunday 07 December 2003 12:49, devik wrote:
 Two oopses were found by zhaoyao and Daniel Blueman. Patch against
 2.4.23 and 2.6.0-test10 is here. It will be included in next kernel
 releases of course.

Did this OOOPSes only affect 2.6 kernels or did (could) they occur on 2.4 as 
well?

Thanks for the help...

Andreas
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/