app builder problems

2004-06-11 Thread John Howard
I know this is simple, and I am just over looking something.  However I can't seem to 
get to the bottom of this.

Every now and then an application I build will create an installer that doesn't work 
properly.

Instead of installing into the "Program Files" directory, it will great a new 
directory called "ProgramsDirectory" or something like that, and install itself in 
there instead of the standard folder.  It does something similar with the Programs 
Menu.

It seems like I figured out what I was doing wrong once before - but I can't seem to 
recall what it was.

Any ideas?

Thanks!

John Howard





JOB POSTING - Test Engineer, Virginia

2004-05-28 Thread John Howard
We are looking for test engineers with LabVIEW experience.

This is a great company to work for!  The job will be both challenging
and rewarding.  There are several positions open, requiring various
levels of experience.

Company: http://www.sperry-marine.com";>Sperry Marine

Location: Charlottesville, Virginia

Contact: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: State machine diagram editor

2004-01-19 Thread John Howard
>>> Lewis Drake 01/18/04 03:02PM >>>
... when I added a new value to the enum, the state case structure case
labels would sometimes shift to ones which were incorrect, and I'd have to
continually check every case and manually adjust the case names.  Perhaps
this is not a problem in LV7.0, I haven't bothered to check it because the
strings work fine.

Lewis,

Just to let you know, this hasn't been a problem ever since 6.0 or so.  (can't 
remember exactly when NI fixed this)

John H.




DAQ OPC on Windows XP?

2004-01-14 Thread John Howard
Since some of you use OPC, maybe someone will have an idea what I am doing wrong here.

I have two Windows XP Pro SP1 computers.  Both have the following common software 
installed:

MAX 3.0.2.3005
NI-DAQ 7.1.0f1
DAQmx 7.1.0f1
Server Explorer 2.4.1 (National Instruments)

I have some virtual channels set up for NI-DAQ, just to make sure DAQ OPC has 
something to look at.

In Server Explorer, when I try to browse the OPC Servers on the remote computer, I 
consistently get the Windows error message "Unable to connect to \\!  Make sure that this computer is on the network, has remote administration 
enabled, and that both computers are running the remote registry service."

If I try to view the registry keys on the remote computer using 'regedt32', I can not 
view anything below HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM, even though I have modified security 
for the following keys to make sure DCOM should work.
"HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\SecurePipeServers ..."
I gave "Everyone" full access to these keys just to be sure security wouldn't be a 
problem.

Does anyone know if there is anything peculiar about Windows XP that might make DAQ 
OPC setup difficult (or maybe just different).  I've done all the DCOM setup stuff 
that National Instruments recommends.  I am using the Administrator account on both 
computers (same password for both).  I am trying to use the simplest possible 
settings, and it just doesn't seem to want to work!

A National Instruments engineer has been trying to help me as well, and I seem to have 
him stumped.

Thanks for any ideas!

John Howard




Re: bad news?

2004-01-13 Thread John Howard
I should have included the link to the original article.  Here it is:
http://email.controleng.com/cgi-bin2/DM/y/efVG0GDREC0GXT0B6Ni0An

>>> "John Howard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 01/13/04 09:00AM >>>
Here is an article from a recent Control Engineering newsletter...

SoftWire's patent infringement lawsuit against NI to proceed

Middleboro, MA?Measurement Computing Corp. and SoftWire Technology
Inc. recently announced that the U.S. District Court in Boston granted
on Nov. 5, 2003, the two firms' request to allow SoftWire to charge
National Instruments (NI) in a pending lawsuit with infringing two
patents owned by SoftWire. Judge Robert Keeton delivered the ruling
over NI's objections. Subsequently, SoftWire filed an amended
complaint accusing NI's LabView product of infringing two of
SoftWire's patents. SoftWire alleges that LabView infringes on two
virtual instrument technology patents that SoftWire originally
acquired from Fluke Corp. These two patents reportedly predate the
earliest of NI's patents. SoftWire is seeking unspecified damages for
past sales of LabView. SoftWire is also seeking an order prohibiting
NI from continuing to sell LabView.





bad news?

2004-01-13 Thread John Howard
Here is an article from a recent Control Engineering newsletter...

SoftWire's patent infringement lawsuit against NI to proceed

Middleboro, MA―Measurement Computing Corp. and SoftWire Technology
Inc. recently announced that the U.S. District Court in Boston granted
on Nov. 5, 2003, the two firms' request to allow SoftWire to charge
National Instruments (NI) in a pending lawsuit with infringing two
patents owned by SoftWire. Judge Robert Keeton delivered the ruling
over NI's objections. Subsequently, SoftWire filed an amended
complaint accusing NI's LabView product of infringing two of
SoftWire's patents. SoftWire alleges that LabView infringes on two
virtual instrument technology patents that SoftWire originally
acquired from Fluke Corp. These two patents reportedly predate the
earliest of NI's patents. SoftWire is seeking unspecified damages for
past sales of LabView. SoftWire is also seeking an order prohibiting
NI from continuing to sell LabView.




Operating System issues

2004-01-07 Thread John Howard
Just thought I'd pass along this article which some of you may find useful.

http://linuxdevices.com/articles/AT4627965573.html

Although not LabVIEW related, it deals with software timing issues and understanding 
how operating systems work.  It is somewhat related to several recent info-LabVIEW 
topics and just too good not to pass along.

John H.