LabVIEW Express 7 and PXI-5122
Hello. I'm involved in a project which aim is digitizing the signals received from several(2 at the beginning) antennas. We pass these signals to an intermediate frequency of about 15 MHz. Now we want to use the NI-5122 to DIGITIZE these signals and after that GENERATE a response. The questions are(I know the hardware for generation has not been specified): 1.- Is the material(LabVIEW and PXI-5122) appropiate for the task?(there could be more antennas in the future) (LabVIEW running in Windows 2000(multi-task) and sharing the bus PCI of the computer with other cards also) 2.- Can we have troubles of time, in order to process the signals at these rates(30MS/s minimum,5122 is a 14bit resolution digitizer, if I'm not wrong) 3.- Should be Real-Time used? 4.- Would the bus PXI and PCI be a problem(I refer to the transfer rate) when working with both channels and at these rates in a continuous way? 5.- In order to generate the signals, could we use the NI-5411 Arbitrary Waveform Generator? Thanks a lot.
Re: API's & drivers
Thanks a lot Brian!!! Another little question to finish: NI-SCOPE(API) can use both NI-DAQ(driver) and NI-DAQmx(driver). Then why NI-SCOPE(API) and not NI-DAQmx(API) or NI-DAQ(API)? Why use NI-SCOPE and NI-FGEN (APIs), in my case, and not NI-DAQ(API) and NI-DAQmx(API)? Which are they advantages? Just being easier to use or learn(because they have a more limited set of functions)? Eneko
API's & drivers
Hello. I'm already a bit confused when reading about drivers and APIs... What's the difference between an API and a driver???(because sometimes texts refers to some of them without distinction). Once known the difference, which is which? NI-DAQ is a... driver or API??? And this for NI-DAQ, NI-DAQmx, NI-SCOPE, NI-FGEN, NI-DAQ 7. For what I think I understand NI-DAQ and NI-DAQmx are both drivers and APIs, and NI-FGEN and NI-SCOPE just APIs. If I'm not wrong, why 2 APIs for one driver??? Thanks.