Re: L&I Anti-Spam Law Passed by Washington State
"Steve Wright" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: -Original Message- From: Ronald Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Law-Issues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Monday, March 30, 1998 9:28 PM Subject: L&I Anti-Spam Law Passed by Washington State >"Ronald Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >Hopefully more states will follow this route. I tlooks like I could get >rich quickly just reporting the Spam that arrives in my AOL account daily. >Ron > Will this include Spam posted to newsgroups? I have a friend who regularly goes to a newsgroup for people who have been sexually abused. The amount of Spam on that newsgroup for inappropriate websites etc, is sickening. Hopefully this will do something. Steve Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
Re: L&I Anti-Spam Law Passed by Washington State
DocCec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: In a message dated 98-03-30 15:27:28 EST, you write: << Hopefully more states will follow this route. I tlooks like I could get rich quickly just reporting the Spam that arrives in my AOL account daily. Ron >> >From your mouth to god's ears, Ron! I "tosspam" dozens every day, since that's what AOL says to do, but can't see that it does much good. They just change screen names and come back like boomerangs. Doc Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
Re: L&I Anti-Spam Law Passed by Washington State
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Viola Provenzano) writes: Hi Bill, Someone ought to give the word to the po Somone ought to give the word to the police about the hordes of mature men on the Jerry Springer show who are impregnating fourteen year old girls without being arrested or convicted. In one cse an old man had married his own daughter. I maintain it is a man's world and men can get away with much more than can women, including the reversal of sexual roles. Vi ___ You wrote: . . .<<>> _ You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail. Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866] Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
Re: L&I Anti-Spam Law Passed by Washington State
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes: Hi Ron, Are these unsolicited e-mail you're referring to? Or those stupid ads that pop up and you have to click "No Thanks" to continue the sign on process? I get those ads all the time, but no spam e-mail at all. I get a few spam e-mail on juno, but not many. Bill On Mon, 30 Mar 1998 12:19:12 -0800 "Ronald Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >"Ronald Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >Hopefully more states will follow this route. I tlooks like I could >get >rich quickly just reporting the Spam that arrives in my AOL account >daily. >Ron > > >Locke signs `spam' bill; it's first such law in nation >by Peter Lewis > >Seattle Times staff reporter > >Gov. Gary Locke yesterday signed into law a bill aimed at curbing >unsolicited commercial bulk e-mail, popularly known as spam. >As a result, Washington becomes the first state in the nation to have >passed >legislation that will curb, if not eliminate, what many e-mail users >consider to be an annoyance or worse, according to California lawyer >David >Kramer. >A recognized expert on Internet e-mail and legislative efforts to >control >it, Kramer has testified before a state House committee in favor of a >tougher version of Washington's anti-spam bill. He also has >collaborated on >bills proposed in Congress and in four other states. >The new law, which will take effect in 90 days, makes it a violation >for >spammers to send e-mail messages that hide their point of origin, mask >the >transmission path, or contain misleading information in the message's >subject line. >Spam, named after the often-derided Hormel meat product, usually >contain >such false information in their "headers," or address fields, and >promote >get-rich-quick schemes, miracle health cures or explicit pornographic >material. >The new law bans both sending e-mail with such deceptive header >information >from computers located in Washington, and sending such e-mail to an >electronic mail address that the sender knows, or has reason to know, >is >held by a Washington resident. >It puts the burden on the sender to find out whether the intended >recipient >lives in Washington. >Individuals who receive such e-mail could collect up to $500 per >violation; >Internet service providers, the companies that provide computer users >access >to the Internet, could receive up to $1,000. >Assistant State Attorney General Paula Selis yesterday said the state >will >aggressively enforce the new law, but she declined to elaborate, >saying her >office generally doesn't like to disclose its enforcement strategies. >She >called the new law "better than nothing." >With the support of the Washington Association of Internet Service >Providers >(WAISP), Selis had drafted a more vigorous law that would have flatly >banned >sending spam - unless there was an existing relationship between the >sender >and the recipient, or the recipient had requested or consented to >receive >it. >But powerful interests, including the Direct Marketing Association and >Microsoft, testified against that version of the bill. >Microsoft lobbyist Deborah Brunton said her company is "very concerned >about >unsolicited junk e-mail, but we also are a company that used >legitimate >e-mail practices to reach out to our customers." She said Microsoft >was >concerned that the bill's original language was ambiguous, and might >have >prohibited the company from developing new markets. >Meanwhile, in his column posted on the Microsoft Web site yesterday, >Chairman Bill Gates skewered spam, writing in part: >"Wasting somebody else's time strikes me as the height of rudeness. We >have >only so many hours, and none to waste. That's what makes electronic >junk >mail and e-mail hoaxes so maddening." >The new law also calls for creation of a three-member task force, >consisting >of two members of the House Energy and Utilities Committee and a >person >appointed by Locke, to identify technical, legal and cost issues >related to >spam, and to evaluate whether existing laws are sufficient to cope >with it. >It sets a Nov. 15 d _ You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail. Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866] eadline for completion of the report. >Meantime, WAISP executive director Gary Gardner said local Internet >providers would review the new law when they gather April 17 at Bell >Harbor >Conference Center on the Seattle waterfront. > >Women have their faults. Men have only two. >Everything they say. Everything they do. >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues > _ You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail. Get completely free
Re: L&I Anti-Spam Law Passed by Washington State
"Ronald Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >Hi Ron, > >Are these unsolicited e-mail you're referring to? Or those stupid ads >that pop up and you have to click "No Thanks" to continue the sign on >process? I get those ads all the time, but no spam e-mail at all. I get >a few spam e-mail on juno, but not many. > I believe that the law only applies to unsolicited e-mail, certainly not ads which pays for Juno, I guess. Ron Women have their faults. Men have only two. Everything they say. Everything they do. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
Re: L&I Anti-Spam Law Passed by Washington State
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes: On Tue, 31 Mar 1998 11:59:26 -0800 "Ronald Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >"Ronald Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >>Hi Ron, >> >>Are these unsolicited e-mail you're referring to? Or those stupid >ads >>that pop up and you have to click "No Thanks" to continue the sign on >>process? I get those ads all the time, but no spam e-mail at all. I >get >>a few spam e-mail on juno, but not many. >> > > >I believe that the law only applies to unsolicited e-mail, certainly >not ads >which pays for Juno, I guess. Ron In that case I must be lucky because I don't get any spam on my AOL e-mail account. Of course, as soon as I say that.. Bill _ You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail. Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866] Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
Re: L&I Anti-Spam Law Passed by Washington State
Jackie Fellows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Hi Bill I don't receive spam mail on this server like I did in Fargo-Moorhead. Maybe it is the size of the town in my case--spammers would go broke in Spamtown, USA. jackief William J. Foristal wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes: > > Hi Ron, > > Are these unsolicited e-mail you're referring to? Or those stupid ads > that pop up and you have to click "No Thanks" to continue the sign on > process? I get those ads all the time, but no spam e-mail at all. I get > a few spam e-mail on juno, but not many. > > Bill > > On Mon, 30 Mar 1998 12:19:12 -0800 "Ronald Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > writes: > >"Ronald Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > >Hopefully more states will follow this route. I tlooks like I could > >get > >rich quickly just reporting the Spam that arrives in my AOL account > >daily. > >Ron > > > > > >Locke signs `spam' bill; it's first such law in nation > >by Peter Lewis > > > >Seattle Times staff reporter > > > >Gov. Gary Locke yesterday signed into law a bill aimed at curbing > >unsolicited commercial bulk e-mail, popularly known as spam. > >As a result, Washington becomes the first state in the nation to have > >passed > >legislation that will curb, if not eliminate, what many e-mail users > >consider to be an annoyance or worse, according to California lawyer > >David > >Kramer. > >A recognized expert on Internet e-mail and legislative efforts to > >control > >it, Kramer has testified before a state House committee in favor of a > >tougher version of Washington's anti-spam bill. He also has > >collaborated on > >bills proposed in Congress and in four other states. > >The new law, which will take effect in 90 days, makes it a violation > >for > >spammers to send e-mail messages that hide their point of origin, mask > >the > >transmission path, or contain misleading information in the message's > >subject line. > >Spam, named after the often-derided Hormel meat product, usually > >contain > >such false information in their "headers," or address fields, and > >promote > >get-rich-quick schemes, miracle health cures or explicit pornographic > >material. > >The new law bans both sending e-mail with such deceptive header > >information > >from computers located in Washington, and sending such e-mail to an > >electronic mail address that the sender knows, or has reason to know, > >is > >held by a Washington resident. > >It puts the burden on the sender to find out whether the intended > >recipient > >lives in Washington. > >Individuals who receive such e-mail could collect up to $500 per > >violation; > >Internet service providers, the companies that provide computer users > >access > >to the Internet, could receive up to $1,000. > >Assistant State Attorney General Paula Selis yesterday said the state > >will > >aggressively enforce the new law, but she declined to elaborate, > >saying her > >office generally doesn't like to disclose its enforcement strategies. > >She > >called the new law "better than nothing." > >With the support of the Washington Association of Internet Service > >Providers > >(WAISP), Selis had drafted a more vigorous law that would have flatly > >banned > >sending spam - unless there was an existing relationship between the > >sender > >and the recipient, or the recipient had requested or consented to > >receive > >it. > >But powerful interests, including the Direct Marketing Association and > >Microsoft, testified against that version of the bill. > >Microsoft lobbyist Deborah Brunton said her company is "very concerned > >about > >unsolicited junk e-mail, but we also are a company that used > >legitimate > >e-mail practices to reach out to our customers." She said Microsoft > >was > >concerned that the bill's original language was ambiguous, and might > >have > >prohibited the company from developing new markets. > >Meanwhile, in his column posted on the Microsoft Web site yesterday, > >Chairman Bill Gates skewered spam, writing in part: > >"Wasting somebody else's time strikes me as the height of rudeness. We > >have > >only so many hours, and none to waste. That's what makes electronic > >junk > >mail and e-mail hoaxes so maddening." > >The new law also calls for creation of a three-member task force, > >consisting > >of two members of the House Energy and Utilities Committee and a > >person > >appointed by Locke, to identify technical, legal and cost issues > >related to > >spam, and to evaluate whether existing laws are sufficient to cope > >with it. > >It sets a Nov. 15 d > _ > You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail. > Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com > Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866] > > eadline for completion of the report. > >Meantime, WAISP executive director Gary Gardner said local Internet > >providers would review the new law when they gather April 17 at
Re: L&I Anti-Spam Law Passed by Washington State
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes: Hi Jackie, It probably depends on many factors, one of which is the profile a subscriber fills out when signing up. Ed clued me in about juno. If you fill out the questionnaire as if you are interested in nothing and planning to buy nothing, you get a lot fewer ads. Perhaps the spammers use the same system. I haven't got a single spam e-mail on AOL. Bill On Wed, 01 Apr 1998 06:41:07 -0600 Jackie Fellows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >Jackie Fellows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >Hi Bill > >I don't receive spam mail on this server like I did in Fargo-Moorhead. > Maybe >it is the size of the town in my case--spammers would go broke in >Spamtown, >USA. > >jackief > >William J. Foristal wrote: > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes: >> >> Hi Ron, >> >> Are these unsolicited e-mail you're referring to? Or those stupid >ads >> that pop up and you have to click "No Thanks" to continue the sign >on >> process? I get those ads all the time, but no spam e-mail at all. >I get >> a few spam e-mail on juno, but not many. >> >> Bill >> >> On Mon, 30 Mar 1998 12:19:12 -0800 "Ronald Helm" ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> writes: >> >"Ronald Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > >> > >> >Hopefully more states will follow this route. I tlooks like I >could >> >get >> >rich quickly just reporting the Spam that arrives in my AOL account >> >daily. >> >Ron >> > >> > >> >Locke signs `spam' bill; it's first such law in nation >> >by Peter Lewis >> > >> >Seattle Times staff reporter >> > >> >Gov. Gary Locke yesterday signed into law a bill aimed at curbing >> >unsolicited commercial bulk e-mail, popularly known as spam. >> >As a result, Washington becomes the first state in the nation to >have >> >passed >> >legislation that will curb, if not eliminate, what many e-mail >users >> >consider to be an annoyance or worse, according to California >lawyer >> >David >> >Kramer. >> >A recognized expert on Internet e-mail and legislative efforts to >> >control >> >it, Kramer has testified before a state House committee in favor of >a >> >tougher version of Washington's anti-spam bill. He also has >> >collaborated on >> >bills proposed in Congress and in four other states. >> >The new law, which will take effect in 90 days, makes it a >violation >> >for >> >spammers to send e-mail messages that hide their point of origin, >mask >> >the >> >transmission path, or contain misleading information in the >message's >> >subject line. >> >Spam, named after the often-derided Hormel meat product, usually >> >contain >> >such false information in their "headers," or address fields, and >> >promote >> >get-rich-quick schemes, miracle health cures or explicit >pornographic >> >material. >> >The new law bans both sending e-mail with such deceptive header >> >information >> >from computers located in Washington, and sending such e-mail to an >> >electronic mail address that the sender knows, or has reason to >know, >> >is >> >held by a Washington resident. >> >It puts the burden on the sender to find out whether the intended >> >recipient >> >lives in Washington. >> >Individuals who receive such e-mail could collect up to $500 per >> >violation; >> >Internet service providers, the companies that provide computer >users >> >access >> >to the Internet, could receive up to $1,000. >> >Assistant State Attorney General Paula Selis yesterday said the >state >> >will >> >aggressively enforce the new law, but she declined to elaborate, >> >saying her >> >office generally doesn't like to disclose its enforcement >strategies. >> >She >> >called the new law "better than nothing." >> >With the support of the Washington Association of Internet Service >> >Providers >> >(WAISP), Selis had drafted a more vigorous law that would have >flatly >> >banned >> >sending spam - unless there was an existing relationship between >the >> >sender >> >and the recipient, or the recipient had requested or consented to >> >receive >> >it. >> >But powerful interests, including the Direct Marketing Association >and >> >Microsoft, testified against that v _ You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail. Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866] ersion of the bill. >> >Microsoft lobbyist Deborah Brunton said her company is "very >concerned >> >about >> >unsolicited junk e-mail, but we also are a company that used >> >legitimate >> >e-mail practices to reach out to our customers." She said Microsoft >> >was >> >concerned that the bill's original language was ambiguous, and >might >> >have >> >prohibited the company from developing new markets. >> >Meanwhile, in his column posted on the Microsoft Web site >yesterday, >> >Chairman Bill Gates skewered spam, writing in part: >> >"Wasting somebody else's time strikes me as the height of rudeness. >We >> >h
Re: L&I Anti-Spam Law Passed by Washington State
DocCec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: In a message dated 98-04-01 12:12:31 EST, you write: << I haven't got a single spam e-mail on AOL. Bill >> I want your email account, Bill! I get several dozen a day -- everything from porn to the inevitable MLM blurbs. Doc Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
Re: L&I Anti-Spam Law Passed by Washington State
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes: On Wed, 1 Apr 1998 13:58:07 EST DocCec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >DocCec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >In a message dated 98-04-01 12:12:31 EST, you write: > ><< I haven't got a single spam e-mail on AOL. > > Bill >> > >I want your email account, Bill! I get several dozen a day -- >everything from >porn to the inevitable MLM blurbs. >Doc LOL...now I feel left out. Bill _ You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail. Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866] Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
Re: L&I Anti-Spam Law Passed by Washington State
Jackie Fellows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Hi Bill I use netscape and must have filled out the profile right. What a relief! jackief William J. Foristal wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes: > > Hi Jackie, > > It probably depends on many factors, one of which is the profile a > subscriber fills out when signing up. Ed clued me in about juno. If you > fill out the questionnaire as if you are interested in nothing and > planning to buy nothing, you get a lot fewer ads. Perhaps the spammers > use the same system. > > I haven't got a single spam e-mail on AOL. > > Bill > > On Wed, 01 Apr 1998 06:41:07 -0600 Jackie Fellows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > writes: > >Jackie Fellows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > >Hi Bill > > > >I don't receive spam mail on this server like I did in Fargo-Moorhead. > > Maybe > >it is the size of the town in my case--spammers would go broke in > >Spamtown, > >USA. > > > >jackief > > > >William J. Foristal wrote: > > > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes: > >> > >> Hi Ron, > >> > >> Are these unsolicited e-mail you're referring to? Or those stupid > >ads > >> that pop up and you have to click "No Thanks" to continue the sign > >on > >> process? I get those ads all the time, but no spam e-mail at all. > >I get > >> a few spam e-mail on juno, but not many. > >> > >> Bill > >> > >> On Mon, 30 Mar 1998 12:19:12 -0800 "Ronald Helm" > ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> writes: > >> >"Ronald Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > > >> > > >> >Hopefully more states will follow this route. I tlooks like I > >could > >> >get > >> >rich quickly just reporting the Spam that arrives in my AOL account > >> >daily. > >> >Ron > >> > > >> > > >> >Locke signs `spam' bill; it's first such law in nation > >> >by Peter Lewis > >> > > >> >Seattle Times staff reporter > >> > > >> >Gov. Gary Locke yesterday signed into law a bill aimed at curbing > >> >unsolicited commercial bulk e-mail, popularly known as spam. > >> >As a result, Washington becomes the first state in the nation to > >have > >> >passed > >> >legislation that will curb, if not eliminate, what many e-mail > >users > >> >consider to be an annoyance or worse, according to California > >lawyer > >> >David > >> >Kramer. > >> >A recognized expert on Internet e-mail and legislative efforts to > >> >control > >> >it, Kramer has testified before a state House committee in favor of > >a > >> >tougher version of Washington's anti-spam bill. He also has > >> >collaborated on > >> >bills proposed in Congress and in four other states. > >> >The new law, which will take effect in 90 days, makes it a > >violation > >> >for > >> >spammers to send e-mail messages that hide their point of origin, > >mask > >> >the > >> >transmission path, or contain misleading information in the > >message's > >> >subject line. > >> >Spam, named after the often-derided Hormel meat product, usually > >> >contain > >> >such false information in their "headers," or address fields, and > >> >promote > >> >get-rich-quick schemes, miracle health cures or explicit > >pornographic > >> >material. > >> >The new law bans both sending e-mail with such deceptive header > >> >information > >> >from computers located in Washington, and sending such e-mail to an > >> >electronic mail address that the sender knows, or has reason to > >know, > >> >is > >> >held by a Washington resident. > >> >It puts the burden on the sender to find out whether the intended > >> >recipient > >> >lives in Washington. > >> >Individuals who receive such e-mail could collect up to $500 per > >> >violation; > >> >Internet service providers, the companies that provide computer > >users > >> >access > >> >to the Internet, could receive up to $1,000. > >> >Assistant State Attorney General Paula Selis yesterday said the > >state > >> >will > >> >aggressively enforce the new law, but she declined to elaborate, > >> >saying her > >> >office generally doesn't like to disclose its enforcement > >strategies. > >> >She > >> >called the new law "better than nothing." > >> >With the support of the Washington Association of Internet Service > >> >Providers > >> >(WAISP), Selis had drafted a more vigorous law that would have > >flatly > >> >banned > >> >sending spam - unless there was an existing relationship between > >the > >> >sender > >> >and the recipient, or the recipient had requested or consented to > >> >receive > >> >it. > >> >But powerful interests, including the Direct Marketing Association > >and > >> >Microsoft, testified against that v > _ > You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail. > Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com > Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866] > > ersion of the bill. > >> >Microsoft lobbyist Deborah Brunton said her company is "very > >concerned > >> >about > >> >unsolicited junk e-mail, but we also are a company that used > >> >legitimate >
Re: L&I Anti-Spam Law Passed by Washington State
"Ronald Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >LOL...now I feel left out. > >Bill Bill, don't feel left out. These are mostly for get rich quick schemes and everyone knows you are already rich :-), the rest are for XXX porno sites, and we know that you are above such behavior :-) Ron Women have their faults. Men have only two. Everything they say. Everything they do. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
Re: L&I Anti-Spam Law Passed by Washington State
DocCec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: In a message dated 98-04-01 17:10:08 EST, you write: << >I want your email account, Bill! I get several dozen a day -- >everything from >porn to the inevitable MLM blurbs. >Doc LOL...now I feel left out. Bill >> Send me your aol account name and I'll happily forward you whatever you want. Or would you rather have it on the Juno account? We aim to please., Doc Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
Re: L&I Anti-Spam Law Passed by Washington State
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes: On Wed, 1 Apr 1998 16:11:54 -0800 "Ronald Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >"Ronald Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >>LOL...now I feel left out. >> >>Bill > > >Bill, don't feel left out. These are mostly for get rich quick >schemes and >everyone knows you are already rich :-), the rest are for XXX porno >sites, >and we know that you are above such behavior :-) Ron Hi Ron, LOL...also, those people don't spam a person who contact them first. :) Bill _ You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail. Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866] Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
Re: L&I Anti-Spam Law Passed by Washington State
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes: On Wed, 1 Apr 1998 20:53:24 EST DocCec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >DocCec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >In a message dated 98-04-01 17:10:08 EST, you write: > ><< >I want your email account, Bill! I get several dozen a day -- > >everything from > >porn to the inevitable MLM blurbs. > >Doc > > LOL...now I feel left out. > > Bill >> > >Send me your aol account name and I'll happily forward you whatever >you want. >Or would you rather have it on the Juno account? We aim to please., >Doc HI Doc, Thanks for your concern, but I think I'd rather feel left out. Don't worry, though, there are still plenty of "silly notes" in my e-mail box each morning for me to laugh at, reply to and delete. Bill _ You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail. Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866] Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
