Re: [Lazarus] Performance of GTK 2 and CE
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 10:36 PM, Mark Morgan Lloyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Runs both locally and remotely. I had to tinker with the -Fu in > extrafpc.cfg to compile, so far I've only used 0.9.24 and haven't tried x86. Excellent. :-) Could you pass on those changes to extrafpc.cfg, so I can add it in. > overhead. It might even be a good default widget set, with > gtk2/Qt/Carbon etc. being selected where the target distro and window > manager are known. A few others have suggested this to me as well, but that's up to the Lazarus developers and how quickly we can get LCL-fpGUI implemented and stable. The huge benefit of LCL-fpGUI will be bug fixing and feature support. No need to limit the widget set to a specific version of the GUI toolkit. Plus if there is a bug or some implementation difference in fpGUI it could easily be tweaked, whereas with GTK2, Qt etc you are out of luck. Regards, - Graeme - ___ fpGUI - a cross-platform Free Pascal GUI toolkit http://opensoft.homeip.net/fpgui/ ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lazarus.freepascal.org http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Forums on www.lazarus.freepascal.org is virtually unusable
> The latest news is/was that the machines where the lazarus site is > running on were "DOSsed" by some Austrian address. By some Austrian address? I swear - its not me... -- -- software security networks Lukas Gradl Eduard-Bodem-Gasse 9 A - 6020 Innsbruck Tel: +43-512-214040-0 Fax: +43-512-214040-21 -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lazarus.freepascal.org http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] How to use FPC 2.3.1
Fabio Dell'Aria wrote: > Hi to all, > > is possible to use FPC 2.3.1 with the last Lazarus 0.9.26? > > If yes how I can do this? > On which OS? On windows: 1) compile fpc 2.3.1 2) compile lazarus by using make from the apropriate fpc directory (for example I do "d:\programming\fpc_2_3\bin\i386-win32\make.exe bigide lazbuild" 3) setup apropriate directories and files in the environment options of the lazarus ide On linux: 1) compile fpc 2.3.1 (make all, make install) 2) redirect ppc386 symlink to the new fpc 2.3.1 executable 3) in the lazarus directory do "make bigide" 4) setup apropriate directories and files in the environment options of the lazarus ide Best regards, Paul Ishenin. ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lazarus.freepascal.org http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Performance of GTK 2 and CE
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: > The fpGUI UI Designer project file is located in > /uidesigner/uidesigner.lpi > Alteratively you can compile from the command line as follows: > cd /uidesigner > fpc @extrafpc.cfg uidesigner.lpr Runs both locally and remotely. I had to tinker with the -Fu in extrafpc.cfg to compile, so far I've only used 0.9.24 and haven't tried x86. I'll put more time into this presently, but after what I've seen over the last few days I think getting LCL+fpgui complete would be an admirable endeavour since it looks as though otherwise we will be at the mercy of gtk1 being discontinued and gtk2 being hobbled by excessive overhead. It might even be a good default widget set, with gtk2/Qt/Carbon etc. being selected where the target distro and window manager are known. -- Mark Morgan Lloyd markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk [Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues] ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lazarus.freepascal.org http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Performance of GTK 2 and CE
Luiz Americo Pereira Camara wrote: > Mark Morgan Lloyd escreveu: >> Having said that I want to try to get 0.9.27 onto my remaining available >> SPARC system, I'm very worried at the prospect of being marooned with >> gtk1 on 0.9.24 while the rest of the World moves on > > > Did you tried to compile/use 0.9.27 with gtk1? It still possible to do > that. No need to switch to older versions of Lazarus/fpc. The current situation with 0.9.27+2.2.3 on SPARC appears to be as below. gtk1: Bus error in object inspector attempting to create an event handler. gtk2: IDE operation appears OK but bus error during compilation. Both raise an exception and fail to exit (I also see this on ARM). I'm afraid I don't have backtraces for these, I need to get a copy of 0.9.27 onto a more accessible development machine- something I'm happier doing now that my desk system is back on a usable 0.9.24. Unfortunately my fastest SPARC only has gtk1 on it- I could probably fix that by changing distro but there's only so many problems I can cope with at one time. I'll try to get onto this in a few days but I'm likely to need some help. Please don't kick me too hard :-) -- Mark Morgan Lloyd markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk [Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues] ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lazarus.freepascal.org http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
[Lazarus] How to use FPC 2.3.1
Hi to all, is possible to use FPC 2.3.1 with the last Lazarus 0.9.26? If yes how I can do this? -- Best regards... Fabio Dell'Aria. ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lazarus.freepascal.org http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
[Lazarus] KOL-CE and TKOLDataModule
Whithout KOL-CE componentes I normally use a TDataModule and I access to its properties, methods and attributes by means of the DataModule1 variable. Which is the correct way to use a TKOLDataModule? Best regards. ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lazarus.freepascal.org http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] KOL-CE and OnClick event in TKOLButton
I have installed the 2.80.2 version and it work, thank you!
2008/11/13 Usuario Anónimo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I use 2.80.1 version and Lazarus 0.927.
>
> 2008/11/13 Yury Sidorov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> Do you use the latest 2.80.2 version of KOL-CE?
>>
>> - Original Message - *From:* Usuario Anónimo<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> *To:* General mailing list
>> *Sent:* Thursday, November 13, 2008 2:36 PM
>> *Subject:* [Lazarus] KOL-CE and OnClick event in TKOLButton
>>
>> Hi, I have this code:
>>
>> procedure TForm1.Button1Click(Sender: PObj);
>> begin
>> ShowMessage('KOL-CE');
>> end;
>>
>> but if I push the button does not happen anything.
>>
>> I have watched in the Object Inspector and the OnClick event is not
>> assigned and I can not assign it manually. What is the problem?
>>
>> Best regards.
>>
>> --
>> ___
>> Lazarus mailing list
>> Lazarus@lazarus.freepascal.org
>> http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
>>
>> ___
>> Lazarus mailing list
>> Lazarus@lazarus.freepascal.org
>> http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
>>
>>
>
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lazarus.freepascal.org
http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] KOL-CE and OnClick event in TKOLButton
That's the source of the problem. You need to use KOL-CE 2.80.2 with the latest
versions of Lazarus.
Yury.
- Original Message -
From: Usuario Anónimo
To: General mailing list
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 3:24 PM
Subject: Re: [Lazarus] KOL-CE and OnClick event in TKOLButton
I use 2.80.1 version and Lazarus 0.927.
2008/11/13 Yury Sidorov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Do you use the latest 2.80.2 version of KOL-CE?
- Original Message -
From: Usuario Anónimo
To: General mailing list
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 2:36 PM
Subject: [Lazarus] KOL-CE and OnClick event in TKOLButton
Hi, I have this code:
procedure TForm1.Button1Click(Sender: PObj);
begin
ShowMessage('KOL-CE');
end;
but if I push the button does not happen anything.
I have watched in the Object Inspector and the OnClick event is not assigned
and I can not assign it manually. What is the problem?
Best regards.
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lazarus.freepascal.org
http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lazarus.freepascal.org
http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lazarus.freepascal.org
http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lazarus.freepascal.org
http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] KOL-CE and OnClick event in TKOLButton
I use 2.80.1 version and Lazarus 0.927.
2008/11/13 Yury Sidorov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Do you use the latest 2.80.2 version of KOL-CE?
>
> - Original Message - *From:* Usuario Anónimo<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> *To:* General mailing list
> *Sent:* Thursday, November 13, 2008 2:36 PM
> *Subject:* [Lazarus] KOL-CE and OnClick event in TKOLButton
>
> Hi, I have this code:
>
> procedure TForm1.Button1Click(Sender: PObj);
> begin
> ShowMessage('KOL-CE');
> end;
>
> but if I push the button does not happen anything.
>
> I have watched in the Object Inspector and the OnClick event is not
> assigned and I can not assign it manually. What is the problem?
>
> Best regards.
>
> --
> ___
> Lazarus mailing list
> Lazarus@lazarus.freepascal.org
> http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
>
> ___
> Lazarus mailing list
> Lazarus@lazarus.freepascal.org
> http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
>
>
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lazarus.freepascal.org
http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] KOL-CE and OnClick event in TKOLButton
Do you use the latest 2.80.2 version of KOL-CE?
- Original Message -
From: Usuario Anónimo
To: General mailing list
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 2:36 PM
Subject: [Lazarus] KOL-CE and OnClick event in TKOLButton
Hi, I have this code:
procedure TForm1.Button1Click(Sender: PObj);
begin
ShowMessage('KOL-CE');
end;
but if I push the button does not happen anything.
I have watched in the Object Inspector and the OnClick event is not assigned
and I can not assign it manually. What is the problem?
Best regards.
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lazarus.freepascal.org
http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lazarus.freepascal.org
http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
[Lazarus] KOL-CE and OnClick event in TKOLButton
Hi, I have this code:
procedure TForm1.Button1Click(Sender: PObj);
begin
ShowMessage('KOL-CE');
end;
but if I push the button does not happen anything.
I have watched in the Object Inspector and the OnClick event is not assigned
and I can not assign it manually. What is the problem?
Best regards.
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lazarus.freepascal.org
http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Performance of GTK 2 and CE
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Mark Morgan Lloyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I can't help notice that IDE 0.9.26 compiled for gtk2 crawls, I've not > yet investigated the speed of gtk2 apps. Is this being slowed down by Just to confirm... I just tried running gtk2 based Lazarus IDE (0.9.27). And yes, it's unusable via a remote X11 connection. Huge delays in user interaction. Yet other GTK2 based applications do not have this issue. I managed to run programs like gEdit, Firefox etc without such issues. So it's definitely a Lazarus specific issue. Regards, - Graeme - ___ fpGUI - a cross-platform Free Pascal GUI toolkit http://opensoft.homeip.net/fpgui/ ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lazarus.freepascal.org http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Performance of GTK 2 and CE
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote: > On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 10:17 AM, Mark Morgan Lloyd > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> If he sees performance problems with my code, i.e. it's a basic >> drawing-speed issue rather than something application-specific, is there >> any other WinCE/PocketPC user who could take both the source and binary >> by direct email in an attempt to see what's going wrong? > I would be interested in taking a look at the application. I am one of > the developers of the wince interface. > > Gmail won't take .exe or .zip with an exe inside, so change the > extensions to close similars, like winzip and winexe. Thanks for that, I believe Andy is watching the list (even though he still can't post) and I'll make sure he's aware. -- Mark Morgan Lloyd markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk [Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues] ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lazarus.freepascal.org http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Performance of GTK 2 and CE
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 10:17 AM, Mark Morgan Lloyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If he sees performance problems with my code, i.e. it's a basic > drawing-speed issue rather than something application-specific, is there > any other WinCE/PocketPC user who could take both the source and binary > by direct email in an attempt to see what's going wrong? Hi, I would be interested in taking a look at the application. I am one of the developers of the wince interface. Gmail won't take .exe or .zip with an exe inside, so change the extensions to close similars, like winzip and winexe. -- Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lazarus.freepascal.org http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Performance of GTK 2 and CE
Aleš Katona wrote: > Fair enough about the quote, but the wording you used originally made > the impression of blackmailing on me, that's where the original > tension is from. That was certainly not my intention and I apologise without reservation to anybody who took it that way. However if somebody had said "C# won't do what you want because it doesn't have a decent form designer or integrated debugger" it would certainly have reinforced my preference to stay with Lazarus. > I understand your position and the original message now, and to > explain my reaction, we get some people here which when their personal > needs are not met (usually bussiness driven people), end up being all > negativist about the project and start a sort of mini-war about how > they'll go to and how ours sucks etc. > usually very immature reactions. My position is that if somebody wants a feature in a piece of open-source software and has commercial resources they should sponsor its development with a bounty. I've never said "I want this feature", I admit that I have rather thrown my hands up in horror when something doesn't work (e.g. hiding the menu bar in gtk1), stops working (SPARC in 0.9.26) or is implausibly slow (e.g. gtk2 to a remote X screen). If somebody doesn't have commercial resources they should use their free time to learn how to add the facilities they want. If somebody has neither commercial resources nor free time I guess a bit of charity is in order, but they certainly shouldn't /demand/ anything :-) > As to the problem of Gtk2/LCL speed, it's still quite possible there's > a bug in LCL which does some unnecessary drawing/signals in gtk2 (this > was so in the past, but on my end/setup was fixed). I don't think that speed is really the issue. The "Big Freeze" after mouse movement is far more serious, and using Wireshark I've not seen LAN traffic during this- I might be wrong and will revisit if I've got time. > Many people get problems with remote lazarus tho, but I'm not sure if > it's only Lazarus/LCL or also other gtk2 programs. I think it's specific to Lazarus in this case since I've not seen other problems with Debian "Lenny" which defaults to gtk2, and I almost invariably run this to a remote screen. It could be some rarely-used facility in the gtk2 libraries that is only being used by the LCL, but that is tantamount to saying it's a Lazarus problem. > Also as I said before, gtk2 performance in general depends heavily on > many aspects including the drivers, theme, it's version and settings > in X.org (for examply my "miraculous" speed is actually result of > using the EXA accelmethod). Understood, and I think that the significant difference in gtk2 performance between the two machines I was using as "X terminals" (I prefer that term because so many people get confused by discussion of what a server is in this context) suggests that at least part of the speed issue is dependent upon properties or facilities negotiated between gtk and X. However as I've said I don't think reduced performance is the significant issue here. Going back to your earlier question about display types, both systems that I was using as X terminals for test purposes are probably far too old to have significant hardware acceleration- certainly as is understood today. The IBM PC-310 is reported by lspci to have an S3 86C864, the Sony Maiow is reported by NT to be a NeoMagic MagicGraph 128XV; in both cases they are operating at 1024x768x16 (I think) and have about 2Mb RAM. Obviously the video in Sun systems is custom, there are issues on that platform about what kernel versions support acceleration for GLX that I think aren't relevant to the current discussion; the IBM has a Savage which again has acceleration issues which I don't think are relevant since in general I'm not using it as a display device. The remaining Compaqs have onboard video, I might be able to replace the 3000 with something marginally newer from our hardware store but I don't think the details are relevant. I need to press on with a bit of USB hacking to keep people happy at this end, I'm also trying to revisit 0.9.27+gtk2 on SPARC. If I can I'll try to look at the menu bar issue with gtk1, but the "Big Freeze" almost certainly needs more familiarity with the LCL's innards than I will be able to build up in finite time. -- Mark Morgan Lloyd markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk [Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues] ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lazarus.freepascal.org http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Performance of GTK 2 and CE
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 12:36 PM, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho > > Gmail won't take .exe or .zip with an exe inside, so change the > extensions to close similars, like winzip and winexe. Yeah, that is damn irritating!!! Plus they don't even do a good job of it. I attached a .tar.gz with only source code in it. The email got rejected saying it contains and executable!! Dumb idiots! As an alternative, use the good old method of manually base64 encoding or uuencode your attachments and paste them into your email as standard text. How sad that we need to resort to the stone ages because ISP's and people like GMail can't find better solutions to virus. Everybody should simply switch to Linux and kiss viruses goodbye! :-) PS: FPC comes with a base64 and I think a uuencode/decode units. Regards, - Graeme - ___ fpGUI - a cross-platform Free Pascal GUI toolkit http://opensoft.homeip.net/fpgui/ ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lazarus.freepascal.org http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Inttostr and strtoint functions give compile time errors.
2008/11/13 Peter Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi All, > > I'm getting an error message with inttostr() function & strtoint() function > giving me an error message (identifier not found). Which unit do I need to > include to make these messages go away? uses sysutils; ? henry ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lazarus.freepascal.org http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Forums on www.lazarus.freepascal.org is virtually unusable
Florian Klaempfl wrote: > Maybe Michael H. can find out why it's slow and then we can look for > solutions how to improve it for example by moving part of the site to > another machine. The latest news is/was that the machines where the lazarus site is running on were "DOSsed" by some Austrian address. To improve overall perfomance, Michael planned to increased the bandwidth, which should be done by now. Don't think that this will help against such "attacks" Marc ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lazarus.freepascal.org http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
[Lazarus] Inttostr and strtoint functions give compile time errors.
Hi All, I'm getting an error message with inttostr() function & strtoint() function giving me an error message (identifier not found). Which unit do I need to include to make these messages go away? showmessage( 'Error [index(es) out of range]:' + #13 + // line 174 below 'current_x = ' + inttostr( current_x ) + #13 + 'current_y = ' + inttostr( current_y ) + #13 + 'new_direction = ' + inttostr( new_direction) + #13 + 'old_direction = ' + inttostr( old_direction) ); Unit1.pas(174,45) Error: Identifier not found "inttostr" Unit1.pas(175,45) Error: Identifier not found "inttostr" Unit1.pas(176,49) Error: Identifier not found "inttostr" Unit1.pas(177,49) Error: Identifier not found "inttostr" Unit1.pas(269,33) Error: Identifier not found "inttostr" Unit1.pas(270,33) Error: Identifier not found "inttostr" Unit1.pas(274,26) Error: Identifier not found "strtoint" Unit1.pas(280,26) Error: Identifier not found "strtoint" Unit1.pas(307) Fatal: There were 8 errors compiling module, stopping Regards, PEW ;-))) -- Fond Regards, Peter Eric (aka 'pew') WILLIAMS from Hobart, Tasmania, Australia -- phone (03) 6236-9675 My free website is: http://pewtas.googlepages.com (or) http://tinyurl.com/yuyejs (please visit my free website and let me know what you think about it.) ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lazarus.freepascal.org http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Performance of GTK 2 and CE
On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 10:21:16 + Mark Morgan Lloyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Fair enough, but I think that puts me in a position that I need to state > my policy and that of the people I work for and with. > > My policy is that I would prefer to build up enough competence in > Lazarus and FPC to be able to make a worthwhile contribution to them. > > Our policy is that we don't want to be forced into supplying equipment > and services to our customers which carry unfavourable technical and > contractual baggage. Roughly translated, we don't want to embed MS OSes > in x86 kit unless it really is inevitable :-) > > We need to eat, and if it gets to the point where the time I'm putting > into dragging myself painfully up the learning curve prevents me from > doing concrete development and system management that is going to be a > problem. Fortunately I don't think we're particularly near that, but I > regularly find that "real work" intervenes in things that are far more > interesting and knocks me offline for days or weeks. > > I think you are being slightly unfair characterising Lazarus, and by > extension other open-source projects, as being driven entirely by > goodwill rather than by enlightened self-interest. The bottom line is > that we like Pascal-style languages, we value the integrated design and > debugging that Delphi championed in its days of glory, and for a whole > lot of reasons we want those facilities on platforms that Borland never > took seriously. > I never ment to say it's good-will based. The itch part means it's based on personal needs as well of course. The point was it's not based on 3rd party needs or requests (at least not "enough"). > Now I'm trying to do my bit keeping things going on SPARC, in part > because it's a representative non-x86 architecture so is worth attention > but also because- at present- it's comparatively easy to get SPARC-based > systems which go rather larger than x86-based. > > Finally, I would thank you not to mis-quote me. You claim that I wrote > "we'll be forced to go elsewhere". I did not write that, what I put was > "I'm in a position where I find myself wondering whether I should start > looking at C# or possibly Embarcadero's current offering" which I think > is fair comment. We should all be doing that now and again, not so much > to try to woo new "customers" but simply to ensure that there was not > some much-appreciated and easy-to-implement facility which was being > overlooked. > Fair enough about the quote, but the wording you used originally made the impression of blackmailing on me, that's where the original tension is from. I understand your position and the original message now, and to explain my reaction, we get some people here which when their personal needs are not met (usually bussiness driven people), end up being all negativist about the project and start a sort of mini-war about how they'll go to and how ours sucks etc. usually very immature reactions. The original misconception was on my side though, I misinterpreted your message as being somewhat blackmail-ish while you were simply stating a decision (the main reason I think was that you mentioned concrete alternatives which led me to believe you ment to do some sort of "they're better" statement). As to the problem of Gtk2/LCL speed, it's still quite possible there's a bug in LCL which does some unnecessary drawing/signals in gtk2 (this was so in the past, but on my end/setup was fixed). Many people get problems with remote lazarus tho, but I'm not sure if it's only Lazarus/LCL or also other gtk2 programs. Also as I said before, gtk2 performance in general depends heavily on many aspects including the drivers, theme, it's version and settings in X.org (for examply my "miraculous" speed is actually result of using the EXA accelmethod). I have no idea about CE, the only time I used lazarus CE apps was to test my lib in an emulator (so it was slow enough by itself). > -- > Mark Morgan Lloyd > markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk > > [Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues] > ___ > Lazarus mailing list > Lazarus@lazarus.freepascal.org > http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus -- Aleš Katona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lazarus.freepascal.org http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Forums on www.lazarus.freepascal.org is virtually unusable
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008, Florian Klaempfl wrote: > Maybe Michael H. can find out why it's slow and then we can look for > solutions how to improve it for example by moving part of the site to > another machine. And while you're at it, update the look of the lazarus site, so it is more in sync with the freepascal/wiki one. The contrast is rather big... Michael. ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lazarus.freepascal.org http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Forums on www.lazarus.freepascal.org is virtually unusable
Maybe Michael H. can find out why it's slow and then we can look for solutions how to improve it for example by moving part of the site to another machine. ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lazarus.freepascal.org http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
