Re: [Lazarus] SVN integration into Lazarus IDE (suggestions)
> On Fri, 7 Nov 2008, Paul Ishenin wrote: > >> Michael Van Canneyt wrote: >> >> > I second this. Borland has (had) a special API in the IDE for this. >> > Specifically, this would mean that lazarus provides an interface >> > in ideintf, which is then implemented for various version control >> > systems... >> >> Dont complicate already complicated task at the begining. Let's Darius >> implement svn plugin at first and then you will push him to make it more >> generic. > > Of course! I'm happy to see that there is a plugin at all :-) > Since I use Subversion, the SVN plugin is a perfect start for me :-) > > But not everyone uses SVN, so... Creating a generic interface was the plan already from the beginning, but I only have limited time to work on this, and rather than trying to work out an API from the beginning I wanted to create something usable first and then see what functionality can be shared after. I welcome any ideas though on improving the SVN plugin as well as the IDE interface. Keep sending them patches :) Darius ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lazarus.freepascal.org http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus repository in Git (summary)
> On 11/6/08, Marc Santhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> I don't know TC and it's GUI, but for cvs and svn there is always TkCVS. > > Thanks, I'll take a look - though I love my CLI interface and it's > consistent across platforms. Maybe the next new developer in our > company can start of with a GUI if they wish. > > As for Team Coherence. The website is here: >http://www.teamcoherence.com/ > > And here's a screenshot: > http://www.teamcoherence.com/images/vmmain.jpg BTW, Lazarus has it's own SVN GUI interface plugin in case you didn't know. It's named lazsvnpkg and can be found under ./components. Mind you it's still under developement (working on the repository browser right now), but basic stuff is in. Darius ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lazarus.freepascal.org http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
[Lazarus] [Fwd: Re: TAChart: simple patch and a code cleanup question]
>> - I'm not sure if more TSeriesPointerStyles will follow from you, but I >> could imagine adding a box and whisker plot style point and an errorbar >> style (other variations on the theme as well) would be possible in the >> future. So what do you say about implementing a polymorphic TPointStyle >> class? > > Good idea. However, what about backwards compatibility? > I personally do not need it, since I have just started switching my > project > to Lazarus, and can easily adjust code, but what about the others? > Is it ok to simply drop TSeriesPointerStyles? Why would you want to drop TSeriesPointerStyles? I would keep it so the user still can specify the point style either at runtime or in the OI. Depending on the choise the right TCustomPointStyle descendant will be created. Or did you have another idea? Darius ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lazarus.freepascal.org http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
