Re: [Lazarus] Annoyance with 1.8RC5

2017-10-15 Thread Donald Ziesig via Lazarus 

On 10/15/2017 01:51 PM, Ondrej Pokorny wrote:

On 15.10.2017 17:05, Donald Ziesig via Lazarus wrote:

What can I do about this?


Find the revision that broke it and fill a bug report. And please give 
information about your OS and WS. I assume you are on Linux/Gtk2.


Ondrej



ok  I'll try


--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org
https://lists.lazarus-ide.org/listinfo/lazarus

Re: [Lazarus] Annoyance with 1.8RC5

2017-10-15 Thread Ondrej Pokorny via Lazarus 

On 15.10.2017 17:05, Donald Ziesig via Lazarus wrote:

What can I do about this?


Find the revision that broke it and fill a bug report. And please give 
information about your OS and WS. I assume you are on Linux/Gtk2.


Ondrej
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org
https://lists.lazarus-ide.org/listinfo/lazarus

[Lazarus] Annoyance with 1.8RC5

2017-10-15 Thread Donald Ziesig via Lazarus 

Hi All!

I have been using RC5 for a couple of days and am annoyed by one 
change.  Maybe its a configuration item that I can't find, but I would 
really like to turn off 'Always on Top' for the Object Inspector, 
Messages, Call Stack and other IDE forms.


I've been using Delphi since version 1 and got used to being able to 
click on an IDE form to bring it to the front.  Now I have to slide it 
out of the way or minimize it (if possible) to get access to other forms 
or the running application.


What can I do about this?

Thanks,

Don

--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org
https://lists.lazarus-ide.org/listinfo/lazarus

Re: [Lazarus] Packages and units with the same name

2017-10-15 Thread Marcos Douglas B. Santos via Lazarus 
On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 12:36 PM, leledumbo via Lazarus
 wrote:
>> I know how it works in a single program, but I thought that using
>> packages could be different... but not.
>
> Packages is Lazarus concept, the compiler has no idea about it at all. What
> Lazarus does with it is generate a unit with the same name as the .lpk
> containing all units belonging to the package in its uses clause (with
> additional Register procedure and initialization section containing
> RegisterPackage call, purely for linking with the IDE), then feed the
> compiler with it. The end result is no different than compiling the units
> manually. In the end, when used by a program, it's the same combinations of
> .o and .ppu pair that the compiler sees.

I see. Thanks.

Regards,
Marcos Douglas
-- 
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org
https://lists.lazarus-ide.org/listinfo/lazarus

Re: [Lazarus] Packages and units with the same name

2017-10-15 Thread leledumbo via Lazarus 
> I know how it works in a single program, but I thought that using 
> packages could be different... but not. 

Packages is Lazarus concept, the compiler has no idea about it at all. What
Lazarus does with it is generate a unit with the same name as the .lpk
containing all units belonging to the package in its uses clause (with
additional Register procedure and initialization section containing
RegisterPackage call, purely for linking with the IDE), then feed the
compiler with it. The end result is no different than compiling the units
manually. In the end, when used by a program, it's the same combinations of
.o and .ppu pair that the compiler sees.



--
Sent from: http://free-pascal-lazarus.989080.n3.nabble.com/
-- 
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org
https://lists.lazarus-ide.org/listinfo/lazarus

[Lazarus] AppProps property for dimmed disabled controls

2017-10-15 Thread Alexey via Lazarus 
Old issue about "patch for dimmed font color for Grid.Enabled=false" 
(patch wasnt applied). Maybe add 
TApplicationProperties.DimmedColorOfDisabledControls ? Then we can use 
it in LCL.


--
Regards,
Alexey

--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org
https://lists.lazarus-ide.org/listinfo/lazarus

Re: [Lazarus] SimpleIPC

2017-10-15 Thread Denis Kozlov via Lazarus 

FPC 2.6.4 didn't yet have any examples for SimpleIPC.

Here are examples for FPC 3.0 and trunk branches:
https://svn.freepascal.org/svn/fpc/branches/fixes_3_0/packages/fcl-process/examples/
https://svn.freepascal.org/svn/fpc/trunk/packages/fcl-process/examples/

You should use SimpleIPC that comes with those newer versions because it 
contains significant fixes and improvements.


Denis


On 14/10/2017 23:35, Terry A. Haimann via Lazarus wrote:

I have fpc 2.6.4 and I can't find such an examples directory.
It's on a Linux Mint install.

On Sat, 2017-10-14 at 18:33 -0300, Marcos Douglas B. Santos wrote:

On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 3:38 PM, Terry A. Haimann via Lazarus
 wrote:

I would like to see a example program forSimpleIPC Server and client.
It would be most helpful if these were cli programs so that I could see
what libraries were required.

There are some examples in \packages\fcl-process\examples directory.

Regards,
Marcos Douglas




--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org
https://lists.lazarus-ide.org/listinfo/lazarus