On Thu, 7 Jan 2021, Santiago A. via lazarus wrote:
El 05/01/2021 a las 10:47, Michael Van Canneyt via lazarus escribió:
Because people are naturally lazy and prefer easy & simple over strict
& rich.
But we could chose a language that is easy & simple for when you want to
do simple things (90% time) and rich when you need to do complex things.
Asciidoc is very easy, but more standarized, and very rich if you need
to to do complex things.
if markdown is to be used, it should be specified which flavor, not just
"markdown"
https://github.com/commonmark/commonmark-spec/wiki/Markdown-Flavors
if we are going for markdown (wouldn't be my first choice) I would go
for Github flavor
https://docs.github.com/en/free-pro-team@latest/github/writing-on-github
Once again, I would prefer Asciidoc
Anyone is free to propose an FPDoc importer for AsciiDoc, MarkDown (insert
flavour of the
month), ReStructuredText.
All it needs to do is convert the given format to fpdoc format, which will
then be processed by fpdoc in the usual manner.
As I said, I do not plan to switch the existing documentation format to markdown
or any other format. The idea is simply to make writing documentation easier for
other users.
I mentioned Markdown because I need it myself for work, so if I decide to work
on it,
it will be markdown. In the original "Gruber" format, since that is what mkdocs
uses,
and from first glances the used Python parser is very simple, straightforward
and
extensible. The best I've seen yet.
Michael.--
___
lazarus mailing list
lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org
https://lists.lazarus-ide.org/listinfo/lazarus
