Re: [Lazarus] Stable islands: testing stability
+1 On 17 September 2012 07:39, Reinier Olislagers reinierolislag...@gmail.comwrote: MML's post on stable islands has made me think. Below some ideas for discussion: If we want to know whether a certain combination of OS+FPC+Lazarus+packages is stable, we: 1. should ask the user 2. don't trust him completely though and we should get measurements Short-term action = I suggest we can create a Lazarus GUI that - asks the user how stable he thinks Lazarus is - collects test measurement data (see below) The GUI can then display the results, save them for the user's own use (import in database etc), and upload to a central web page The GUI could run these tests: - compiler test suite. Custom test code; results available as XML, IIRC. - FPC database tests (e.g. for bufdataset, memds, sdfdataset, perhaps test Firebird embedded, sqlite, as well as any specified in the user's database.ini). These are fpcunit tests; can spit out e.g. XML - any other fpc tests written with fpcunit - Lazarus non-GUI tests (can't remember what data format these have) Medium-term action == - Have FPC report not only version but also SVN revision (much like lazarus does in help/about) so that data can be used to pinpoint exactly what version is used if checked out from SVN (e.g. trunk) - Write small cross platform database application to collect, read in test results into database; useful for user's own use - Similar but for a central web site. Web page with results could be done much like the compiler test suite page - Extend FPC fpcunit tests for packages (both in coverage and number of packages tested) - Extend Lazarus non-GUI tests (e.g. fill stringgrid, save as csv, load from csv, compare grid contents). Perhaps even a policy/behaviour change: no new units accepted without relevant tests (of course where feasible) - Extend packages so that there is a self-test possibility: the GUI mentioned above) and/or IDE shoul run unit tests in the packages and get the resutls. Example: Lazreport creates sample report, outputs to file, and compares file contents with expected contents Extending the test suites etc. would aid in regression testing as long as attention is paid to the trend in test faults. What do you think? Thanks, Reinier -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Stable islands: testing stability
2012/9/17 Reinier Olislagers reinierolislag...@gmail.com: MML's post on stable islands has made me think. - Have FPC report not only version but also SVN revision (much like lazarus does in help/about) so that data can be used to pinpoint exactly what version is used if checked out from SVN (e.g. trunk) This is already available in the compiler, if you use fpc -iW. You might not see it in the current installers, because they are built from svn exported directories, to increase stability in building. Vincent -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Process ID
On 09/14/2012 09:26 PM, Marco van de Voort wrote: Yeah. Everybody doing his own parsing of system textfiles is *such* a good principle to build durable applications on *g* -- Haha, Of course it is good that script file programmers can use standard text parsing methods to access system information. But Of course dedicated binary Kernel api calls for all this do exist for more sophisticated purposes. Now any programmer can decide what to use when. - Michael -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Stable islands: testing stability
This is already available in the compiler, if you use fpc -iW. You might not see it in the current installers, because they are built from svn exported directories, to increase stability in building. What is the use of displaying the svn revision if it doesn't work when building fpc from svn? Ludo -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Stable islands: testing stability
2012/9/17 Ludo Brands ludo.bra...@free.fr: This is already available in the compiler, if you use fpc -iW. You might not see it in the current installers, because they are built from svn exported directories, to increase stability in building. What is the use of displaying the svn revision if it doesn't work when building fpc from svn? None, that is why it is not shown now. Vincent -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Stable islands: testing stability
On Mon, 17 Sep 2012 09:32:46 +0200 Vincent Snijders vincent.snijd...@gmail.com wrote: 2012/9/17 Reinier Olislagers reinierolislag...@gmail.com: MML's post on stable islands has made me think. - Have FPC report not only version but also SVN revision (much like lazarus does in help/about) so that data can be used to pinpoint exactly what version is used if checked out from SVN (e.g. trunk) This is already available in the compiler, if you use fpc -iW. With -iW I only get the fpc version, not the svn revision. You might not see it in the current installers, because they are built from svn exported directories, to increase stability in building. Mattias -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Stable islands: testing stability
2012/9/17 Mattias Gaertner nc-gaert...@netcologne.de: With -iW I only get the fpc version, not the svn revision. vincent@fpclin32:~/src/fpc/trunk$ compiler/ppc386 -iW 2.7.1-r1:22243 Vincent -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Stable islands: testing stability
On Mon, 17 Sep 2012 10:55:27 +0200 Vincent Snijders vincent.snijd...@gmail.com wrote: 2012/9/17 Mattias Gaertner nc-gaert...@netcologne.de: With -iW I only get the fpc version, not the svn revision. vincent@fpclin32:~/src/fpc/trunk$ compiler/ppc386 -iW 2.7.1-r1:22243 $ ./compiler/ppcx64 -iW 2.7.1 Maybe it must be compiled with some special flag? Mattias -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Stable islands: testing stability
Vincent Snijders wrote: 2012/9/17 Reinier Olislagers reinierolislag...@gmail.com: MML's post on stable islands has made me think. - Have FPC report not only version but also SVN revision (much like lazarus does in help/about) so that data can be used to pinpoint exactly what version is used if checked out from SVN (e.g. trunk) This is already available in the compiler, if you use fpc -iW. You might not see it in the current installers, because they are built from svn exported directories, to increase stability in building. Does that include untagged snapshots? Are there cases where one or more files associated with a tagged version aren't in fact locked down? For example, if a file being worked on hasn't yet been committed to svn? It is possible to look at either the files associated with a tagged version or the repository and to determine unambiguously what revision it was created at? -- Mark Morgan Lloyd markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk [Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues] -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Stable islands: testing stability
On 17/09/12 09:48, Mattias Gaertner wrote: With -iW I only get the fpc version, not the svn revision. Same here, but I thought maybe it is because I use the git mirror, instead of SubVersion directly. Regards, - Graeme - -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Stable islands: testing stability
On 17/09/12 09:55, Vincent Snijders wrote: vincent@fpclin32:~/src/fpc/trunk$ compiler/ppc386 -iW 2.7.1-r1:22243 What does the 'r1' part mean? Surely not Revision 1? Graeme. -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Lazbuild on IBM Power6 (OpenSuse Linux)
Leonardo M. Ramé wrote: As I must deploy a Lazarus CGI on this machine, an IBM 560 with a PowerPC processor using OpenSuse Linux, and I'm getting some Access Violations on places where the x86-64 works ok, I'm offering access to this machine to the Lazarus developers. Then machine has Gnome 2.x (from 2006) installed, but I didn't tested, since I don't need it, I just have to log in using SSH, compile my app and run it. I've installed FPC 2.7.1 from sources and Lazarus also from sources. If anyone is interested in helping me with this, I can give a user/pass. Reality check for the record please: is this 64- or 32-bit? Also assuming FPC and Lazarus both trunk, what revision numbers? -- Mark Morgan Lloyd markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk [Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues] -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Stable islands: testing stability
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: On 17/09/12 09:55, Vincent Snijders wrote: vincent@fpclin32:~/src/fpc/trunk$ compiler/ppc386 -iW 2.7.1-r1:22243 What does the 'r1' part mean? Surely not Revision 1? I believe the colon indicates a range. Actually, I'm failing to see the revision even with versions that I'm pretty sure I've built from svn: 0 2markMLl@pye-dev-01:~$ ppcsparc-2.7.1 -iW 2.7.1 -- Mark Morgan Lloyd markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk [Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues] -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Stable islands: testing stability
On 17/09/12 10:46, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote: vincent@fpclin32:~/src/fpc/trunk$ compiler/ppc386 -iW 2.7.1-r1:22243 I believe the colon indicates a range. Yes, I understand the colon syntax used by SubVersion, but why a range of 1–22243? This make no sense to me. So that's why I'm wonder what the 'r1' could really mean. Regards, - Graeme - -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
[Lazarus] Version info
Hi all. When building a program or a library with Lazarus I can embed in the resulting program (or library) version information (project properties, version tab). In a Windows environment I can retrieve this information using the properties option on the explorer right click. Do you know someting similar I can use in Linux to display the version information either for a normal program or a library (.so) ? Thanks, Antonio. -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Stable islands: testing stability
2012/9/17 Mattias Gaertner nc-gaert...@netcologne.de: On Mon, 17 Sep 2012 10:55:27 +0200 Vincent Snijders vincent.snijd...@gmail.com wrote: 2012/9/17 Mattias Gaertner nc-gaert...@netcologne.de: With -iW I only get the fpc version, not the svn revision. vincent@fpclin32:~/src/fpc/trunk$ compiler/ppc386 -iW 2.7.1-r1:22243 $ ./compiler/ppcx64 -iW 2.7.1 Maybe it must be compiled with some special flag? If the file compiler/revision.inc exists, it is updated during compilation with the output of svnversion -c and included in the compiler executable. So before doing make all, do touch revision.inc Vincent -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Lazbuild on IBM Power6 (OpenSuse Linux)
On 2012-09-17 09:18:22 +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote: Leonardo M. Ramé wrote: As I must deploy a Lazarus CGI on this machine, an IBM 560 with a PowerPC processor using OpenSuse Linux, and I'm getting some Access Violations on places where the x86-64 works ok, I'm offering access to this machine to the Lazarus developers. Then machine has Gnome 2.x (from 2006) installed, but I didn't tested, since I don't need it, I just have to log in using SSH, compile my app and run it. I've installed FPC 2.7.1 from sources and Lazarus also from sources. If anyone is interested in helping me with this, I can give a user/pass. Reality check for the record please: is this 64- or 32-bit? Also assuming FPC and Lazarus both trunk, what revision numbers? Here's the info: uname -a: Linux linux-uftu 2.6.16.60-0.21-ppc64 #1 SMP Tue May 6 12:41:02 UTC 2008 ppc64 ppc64 ppc64 GNU/Linux FPC rev. 22377 Lazarus rev. 38627 -- Leonardo M. Ramé http://leonardorame.blogspot.com -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Lazbuild on IBM Power6 (OpenSuse Linux)
Hi Leonardo On 17 September 2012 13:53, Leonardo M. Ramé l.r...@griensu.com wrote: On 2012-09-17 09:18:22 +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote: Leonardo M. Ramé wrote: I've installed FPC 2.7.1 from sources and Lazarus also from sources. Just one question: Are you sure Lazarus works with FPC2.7.1? I got the idea that it only works with FPC2.6? I might be wrong and it might not be a problem when installing from source, though. Just an idea to check. Cheers Chavoux -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Stable islands: testing stability
If the file compiler/revision.inc exists, it is updated during compilation with the output of svnversion -c and included in the compiler executable. So before doing make all, do touch revision.inc On windows: make clean all Results in version.pas(99,3) Error: Illegal expression version.pas(103) Fatal: There were 1 errors compiling module, stopping Fatal: Compilation aborted make[5]: *** [ppc386.exe] Error 1 revision.inc is empty. Ludo -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Stable islands: testing stability
2012/9/17 Ludo Brands ludo.bra...@free.fr: Results in What is result of svnversion -c on your computer? version.pas(99,3) Error: Illegal expression version.pas(103) Fatal: There were 1 errors compiling module, stopping Fatal: Compilation aborted make[5]: *** [ppc386.exe] Error 1 revision.inc is empty. Ask on fpc-pascal or submit a fpc bug report. Vincent -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Lazbuild on IBM Power6 (OpenSuse Linux)
On 2012-09-17 14:02:30 +0200, Chavoux Luyt wrote: Hi Leonardo On 17 September 2012 13:53, Leonardo M. Ramé [1]l.r...@griensu.com wrote: On 2012-09-17 09:18:22 +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote: Leonardo M. Ramé wrote: I've installed FPC 2.7.1 from sources and Lazarus also from sources. Just one question: Are you sure Lazarus works with FPC2.7.1? I got the idea that it only works with FPC2.6? I might be wrong and it might not be a problem when installing from source, though. Just an idea to check. Cheers Chavoux Chavoux, yes, at least it works in my Ubuntu Linux x64, even cross compiling to Win32. -- Leonardo M. Ramé http://leonardorame.blogspot.com -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Version info
Version Info Unit: http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/topic,12435.msg63887.html#msg63887 2012/9/17 Antonio Fortuny a.fort...@sitasoftware.lu Hi all. When building a program or a library with Lazarus I can embed in the resulting program (or library) version information (project properties, version tab). In a Windows environment I can retrieve this information using the properties option on the explorer right click. Do you know someting similar I can use in Linux to display the version information either for a normal program or a library (.so) ? Thanks, Antonio. -- __**_ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.**freepascal.orgLazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.**freepascal.org/mailman/**listinfo/lazarushttp://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus -- Atenciosamente, Alexsander da Rosa -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
[Lazarus] TAChart and legend items
Hello, How can I make sure that the Legend of TAChart breaks each item to it's own line ? At the moment it seems like it just try to align everything into one line Thanks, Ido -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Version info
Le 17/09/2012 15:18, Alexsander Rosa a écrit : Version Info Unit: http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/topic,12435.msg63887.html#msg63887 I've already my own routines to get the program (or library) version numbers from Windows. The sources commented on that forum look like Windows too. My concern is about Linux. 2012/9/17 Antonio Fortuny a.fort...@sitasoftware.lu mailto:a.fort...@sitasoftware.lu Hi all. When building a program or a library with Lazarus I can embed in the resulting program (or library) version information (project properties, version tab). In a Windows environment I can retrieve this information using the properties option on the explorer right click. Do you know someting similar I can use in Linux to display the version information either for a normal program or a library (.so) ? Thanks, Antonio. -- _ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.__freepascal.org mailto:Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.__freepascal.org/mailman/__listinfo/lazarus http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus -- Atenciosamente, Alexsander da Rosa -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] TAChart and legend items
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 4:55 PM, ik ido...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, How can I make sure that the Legend of TAChart breaks each item to it's own line ? Answering myself : the problem was that I added columncount of two At the moment it seems like it just try to align everything into one line Thanks, Ido -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Version info
On 17/09/12 15:57, Alexsander Rosa wrote: software, I usually add a --version command line option. When called with --version the program outputs the version and terminate. Same here. Under Linux, that is all you can do (as far as I know). No desktop environment (like KDE, Gnome, XFCE etc) has a Version Information tab in the file properties. As for libraries, Linux (and most *nix systems) have a well established naming convention where the version number is part of the filename. I find this actually better than Windows - thus you can have multiple versions installed at the same time. eg: libfbclient-2.0.so libfbclient-2.5.2.so Regards, - Graeme - -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Version info
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: On 17/09/12 15:57, Alexsander Rosa wrote: software, I usually add a --version command line option. When called with --version the program outputs the version and terminate. Same here. Under Linux, that is all you can do (as far as I know). No desktop environment (like KDE, Gnome, XFCE etc) has a Version Information tab in the file properties. As for libraries, Linux (and most *nix systems) have a well established naming convention where the version number is part of the filename. I find this actually better than Windows - thus you can have multiple versions installed at the same time. eg: libfbclient-2.0.so libfbclient-2.5.2.so I sympathise with the OP though: the Lazarus IDE has facilities to insert version information, so how can you get at that even if it means running the program (without necessarily displaying a form etc.) to extract it? And for that matter, how can one merge svn information into it? :-) -- Mark Morgan Lloyd markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk [Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues] -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Version info
On 17/09/12 17:06, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
I sympathise with the OP though: the Lazarus IDE has facilities to
insert version information, so how can you get at that even if it means
Yeah, those options are pretty pointless on any platform - except Windows.
And for that matter, how can one merge svn information into it? :-)
All my apps, linux windows, gui console, supports a --version
parameter. When I want to include repository information like SHA1 (git)
or Revision (svn), then I use include files that set a value for a
version constant. I do the same for the FPC version.
For example, here are some constants for one of my apps...
NOTE the formatting for FPC version and application compiled date. They
are like macros.
cMajorVersion = 3;
cMinorVersion = 0;
cBuildVersion: string = {$I revision.inc} // '006-rc1';
cCompileDateTime: string = {$I %date%} + ' ' + {$I %time%};
cFPCVersion: string = {$I %fpcversion%};
// Name + cMajorVersion + cMinorVersion + Build + cBuildVersion
cAppNameFormatStr = '%s v%d.%2.2d (%s %s)';
// Name + cMajorVersion + cMinorVersion + Centre
cAppNameCentreFormatStr = '%s v%d.%2.2d - [%s]';
cAppNameCGI = '%s v%d.%2.2d';
I also have a VERSION-GEN script that gets executed before I do a Build
All. It generates output as shown below, which I normally pipe into a
*.inc file, and get set as a constant in my application.
'3.0.12.9.gbcfb.dirty';
This gives me lots of information:
3 - major version
0 - minor version
12 - build number
9 - commits since the last released version (v3.0.12)
gbcfb - the SHA1 value of the last commit in my git repository
(if you don't know git, this is live a revision number)
dirty - this tells me the build was made, but I had local changes
that wasn't committed in the repository yet.
The next released version will be v3.0.13 - we don't really use the
minor version number in our company software. The formatting string
above shows how we display version information to the end-user.
Regards,
- Graeme -
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Version info
On Mon, 17 Sep 2012, Antonio Fortuny wrote: Le 17/09/2012 16:12, Alexsander Rosa a écrit : It works on Linux. Indeed. My problem is to obtain the same information for any other file and not only for my own one. Again for this I already have some other functions. what if, the version prgram is vpgm and I do: vpgm /folder/progs/anotherprogram for which I do not have a handle and is even not loaded. As the function to get the resources works with the handle, this will not work anyway. same for a library which cannot be launched on its own. ? The fileinfo unit distributed with FPC can do it for any file that has resources compiled in. It's currently only deployed on windows, but I have a modified version that works on any platform. All it needs is the filename. Note that on non-windows, the file you open must have FPC-style (i.e. windows style) version info compiled-in. Michael. Antonio. -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
[Lazarus] TAChart transparency implementation questions
This is a re-post of http://forum.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/topic,18051.0.html where I report on newly added transparency support in TAChart and ask some questions. I suspect that most of people who could answer do not read the forum, so questions are copied below. Apologies to those who already read it. 1) Transparency support for the canvas drawer is quite a hack: see source. https://github.com/graemeg/lazarus/blob/f320da3d4b5b72de7df7055ec1004def71db3693/components/tachart/tadrawercanvas.pas#L293 Is there a better way? (I think not, but maybe I missed something). Is it portable enough? 2) Is there a way to support transparency at the TFPCustomCanvas level? (Again, I think not) 3) Are there any plans for transparency support in FPVectorial? 4) Does anyone have any idea about possibility to support transparency on printer canvas? -- Alexander S. Klenin -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Lazbuild on IBM Power6 (OpenSuse Linux)
On Mon, 17 Sep 2012 14:02:30 +0200 Chavoux Luyt chav...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Leonardo On 17 September 2012 13:53, Leonardo M. Ramé l.r...@griensu.com wrote: On 2012-09-17 09:18:22 +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote: Leonardo M. Ramé wrote: I've installed FPC 2.7.1 from sources and Lazarus also from sources. Just one question: Are you sure Lazarus works with FPC2.7.1? I got the idea that it only works with FPC2.6? I might be wrong and it might not be a problem when installing from source, though. Just an idea to check. There were some fpc 2.7.1 revisions that didn't work with Lazarus, but usually and currently it does. Mattias -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Stable islands: testing stability
What is result of svnversion -c on your computer? 1:22412M version.pas(99,3) Error: Illegal expression version.pas(103) Fatal: There were 1 errors compiling module, stopping Fatal: Compilation aborted make[5]: *** [ppc386.exe] Error 1 revision.inc is empty. Ask on fpc-pascal or submit a fpc bug report. Will do, Ludo -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
