Re: [Lazarus] Mantis image attachments

2016-01-05 Thread Anthony Walter
Here is the relevant mantis configuration setting:

https://www.mantisbt.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=3=6069#p14718
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus


[Lazarus] Mantis image attachments

2016-01-05 Thread Anthony Walter
Can someone change the mantis bug tracker attachment settings such that
image attachments can be viewed in the browser?

Currently when you click an image attached to an issue it downloads the
attachment as a file rather than just opening the image in the browser.

This then necessitates several steps:

click image attached to an issue
opening the your local download folder
finding the file in the folder
opening a program program to view the image
then cleaning up the download folder by deleting the image file

If attached images in mantis server were configured to use content
disposition inline, the steps for viewing an image attached to an issue
would be:

click image attached to an issue
the image is shown in the browser

Thanks
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus


[Lazarus] Do we really need a PaintSwastika procedure?

2016-01-05 Thread Anthony Walter
While browsing the docs I found:

http://docs.getlazarus.org/#lcl+extgraphics+paintswastika

Do we really need this procedure in the lcl? I think it should probably be
removed. If anyone wants to see the details of when it was committed to
svn, the inserted revision number is 9692.
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus


Re: [Lazarus] Do we really need a PaintSwastika procedure?

2016-01-05 Thread Michael Van Canneyt



On Wed, 6 Jan 2016, Anthony Walter wrote:


While browsing the docs I found:

http://docs.getlazarus.org/#lcl+extgraphics+paintswastika

Do we really need this procedure in the lcl? I think it should probably be
removed. If anyone wants to see the details of when it was committed to
svn, the inserted revision number is 9692.


Besides more recent not so nice connotations, the swastika is an ancient symbol
for the sun and auspiciousness from asia (India, I believe). 
I believe the rays are rotated though, compared to the German version.


So maybe first check it, prior to jumping to conclusions.

Michael.

--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus