Re: [Lazarus] Debian: fpc-source update
> by manually, would that be something like apt-get remove fpc-2.6.2 or rm /f path/to/fpc/2.6.2 ?? if dpkg -l still shows fpc-2.6.2 then do the former, otherwise the latter. -- View this message in context: http://free-pascal-lazarus.989080.n3.nabble.com/Lazarus-Debian-fpc-source-update-tp4036823p4036833.html Sent from the Free Pascal - Lazarus mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Debian: fpc-source update
On Thu, 01 May 2014 15:24:44 -0400 waldo kitty wrote: > On 5/1/2014 7:16 AM, Mattias Gaertner wrote: > > On Thu, 01 May 2014 12:10:32 +0200 > > John Landmesser wrote: > > > >> [...] > >> do i have to remove version 2.6.2 manually? > >> > >> If i do > >> apt-cache show fpc-source > >> > >> there is no line "replaces ..", so i think its my job to remove the old > >> fpc-source 2.6.2?? > >> > >> But why?? > > > > You can have both. They don't interfere. > > So, yes, you have to remove old versions manually when you don't need > > them anymore. > > by manually, would that be something like > >apt-get remove fpc-2.6.2 yes Mattias -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Debian: fpc-source update
On 5/1/2014 7:16 AM, Mattias Gaertner wrote: On Thu, 01 May 2014 12:10:32 +0200 John Landmesser wrote: [...] do i have to remove version 2.6.2 manually? If i do apt-cache show fpc-source there is no line "replaces ..", so i think its my job to remove the old fpc-source 2.6.2?? But why?? You can have both. They don't interfere. So, yes, you have to remove old versions manually when you don't need them anymore. by manually, would that be something like apt-get remove fpc-2.6.2 or rm /f path/to/fpc/2.6.2 ?? -- NOTE: No off-list assistance is given without prior approval. Please *keep mailing list traffic on the list* unless private contact is specifically requested and granted. -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Debian: fpc-source update
On Thu, 01 May 2014 12:10:32 +0200 John Landmesser wrote: >[...] > do i have to remove version 2.6.2 manually? > > If i do > apt-cache show fpc-source > > there is no line "replaces ..", so i think its my job to remove the old > fpc-source 2.6.2?? > > But why?? You can have both. They don't interfere. So, yes, you have to remove old versions manually when you don't need them anymore. Mattias -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
[Lazarus] Debian: fpc-source update
Ok, a little bit off topic, but perhaps someone has the answer. On my Debian ( sid ) i installed fpc-source with apt-get. After dist-upgrade i have two versions of fpc-source: apt-cache policy fpc-source fpc-source: Installiert: 2.6.4+dfsg-1 Installationskandidat: 2.6.4+dfsg-1 Versionstabelle: *** 2.6.4+dfsg-1 0 500 http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ unstable/main i386 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 2.6.2-8 0 500 http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ unstable/main i386 Packages do i have to remove version 2.6.2 manually? If i do apt-cache show fpc-source there is no line "replaces ..", so i think its my job to remove the old fpc-source 2.6.2?? But why?? Thanks for a tipp!! -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
