Re: [fpc-pascal] Notice: Possible copyright infringements in FPC code base

2008-01-15 Thread Mattias Gaertner
On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 14:12:38 +0100
Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 
> On 15 Jan 2008, at 14:05, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> 
> >> On 15/01/2008, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> -- 8< --
> >>
> >> thanks for your explanation, i was curious what the progress on
> >> this was.  are there similar infringements in the lcl that needs
> >> to be replaced, or has this not been reviewed?
> >
> > The FPC team has not reviewed the LCL; Maybe the lazarus team has;
> > However, I have no news of this.
> 
> The tool I used to check the FPC sources is in FPC svn under utils/ 
> sim_pasc and should compile with any C compiler under any *nix (and  
> possibly also under Windows). See the file HOWTO-FPC.txt for how to  
> use it. It has no problem with e.g. checking many include files vs a  
> single unit.

AFAIK only parts of the LCL were searched yet. A few things were found
and removed/replaced.
If someone knows of copied code, please tell us.


Mattias

_
 To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
   archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives


Re: [fpc-pascal] Notice: Possible copyright infringements in FPC code base

2008-01-15 Thread Michael Van Canneyt


On Tue, 15 Jan 2008, Henry Vermaak wrote:

> On 15/01/2008, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -- 8< --
> > As far as I can judge:
> > They count on us to play things fair, and let us handle it to our
> > own judgement for the moment, but said that if we undertook no
> > action, they would take the necessary steps to protect their IP.
> > We have given them the initial result of our review (i.e. the list
> > of suspicious routines), and I haven't heard from them since.
> > As soon as we merge the clean-room implementation to the main
> > branch, I will inform them that this has been done.
> >
> 
> thanks for your explanation, i was curious what the progress on this
> was.  are there similar infringements in the lcl that needs to be
> replaced, or has this not been reviewed?

The FPC team has not reviewed the LCL; Maybe the lazarus team has; 
However, I have no news of this.

Michael.

_
 To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
   archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives


Re: [fpc-pascal] Notice: Possible copyright infringements in FPC code base

2008-01-15 Thread Henry Vermaak
On 15/01/2008, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-- 8< --
> As far as I can judge:
> They count on us to play things fair, and let us handle it to our
> own judgement for the moment, but said that if we undertook no
> action, they would take the necessary steps to protect their IP.
> We have given them the initial result of our review (i.e. the list
> of suspicious routines), and I haven't heard from them since.
> As soon as we merge the clean-room implementation to the main
> branch, I will inform them that this has been done.
>

thanks for your explanation, i was curious what the progress on this
was.  are there similar infringements in the lcl that needs to be
replaced, or has this not been reviewed?

> Michael.

henry

_
 To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
   archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives