RE: [Leaf-devel] SF Mirror
And I imagine once I get my stuff set back up, I can pull down backups as well. To be honest, 35MB is not a lot of space to me. I can also dust off my tape drive and get it setup again. If 'disaster' strikes I imagine we'll have numerous geographically dispersed backups. :) In the mean time, I am trying to get my ISP to understand that 'static ip address' does NOT mean static on the OUTSIDE of the DSL modem, but ON MY MACHINE's NIC! Particularly at the rate I am paying for. As it stands, it's nice for surfing and game play and such, but sucks for web/mail server. -sp -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mike Noyes Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 8:25 AM To: Matt Schalit; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Leaf-devel] SF Mirror At 2002-02-15 15:44 -0800, Matt Schalit wrote: >I hate to be a bit lazy, but lacking all the fancy Linux >distro's, I was wondering if somebody could distill the >essential commands needed to grab everything in bulk data >format so that I'd just have a few .tgz files or something. >Sort of like: > > 1) SF provides nightly tarballs of our repository for backup purposes. > http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cvstarballs/leaf-cvsroot.tar.gz > 2) Grab all released files > wget -m http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/leaf/ > 3) Rsync some stuff > rsync blah > 4) Back all that up to tape. Matt, I'm working on a site mirroring FAQ for this purpose. -- Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/ http://leaf.sourceforge.net/content.php?menu=1000&page_id=4 ___ Leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel ___ Leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
[Leaf-devel] Re: [Leaf-user] udhcp package
The udhcp.lrp package for Dachstein/mountain releases is ready for testing. This package includes both a dhcp server and client and weighs in at 22.6KB total. Full support for everything except aliased interfaces should be there and working. You can get it at: http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/guitarlynn/images/udhcp.lrp I'll see if I can get a non-release specific package up within a couple of days. Throw me some bugs and enjoy! -- ~Lynn Avants aka Guitarlynn guitarlynn at users.sourceforge.net http://leaf.sourceforge.net If linux isn't the answer, you've probably got the wrong question! ___ Leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
Re: [Leaf-devel] ADM Write Protect
Manfred, I have a meeting this week with SST distributor Symmetry Electronics. They are providing me with a 8MB unit, so my father can try to create a jumper/switch that enables/disables WP. The people at SST have indicated that WP is possible. It looks like the Apacer representative below is saying the same thing. A hardware change is needed. Specifically, creation of a jumper that connects pin 62 of the LD017 controller chip to ground is needed to use WP. Does your Apacer ADM have an LD017 controller chip on it? At 2002-02-18 07:52 +0100, Manfred Schuler wrote: >I received today this statement from apacer: > >Betreff: >Fw: ADM write protection > Datum: >Mon, 18 Feb 2002 13:49:00 +0800 >Von: >"Sarah Hsieh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > An: >"Manfred Schuler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Dear customer, >I am very sorry for that not providing prompt response due to a long >vacation (Chinese New Year) from 2/9 ~ 2/17. And the answer is Yes. Our >ATA Diak Module have at this time no possibility for write protection. >The write protection function need to change the hardware designing. > >If you have any problem, please contact us, we will be glad to help you. >Best regards, >Apacer Service Engineer -- Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/ http://leaf.sourceforge.net/content.php?menu=1000&page_id=4 ___ Leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
RE: [Leaf-devel] SF Mirror
Ibiblio might be a good mirror for LEAF. They just added another terabyte of storage online, they have a lot of bandwidth, they are Linux friendly, and they are willing to host .org web sites. http://www.ibiblio.org/about.html BTW, both leaf-project.org and leaf-central.org are currently available. Wouldn't it be neat if LEAF's home page was something like http://www.leaf-central.org? Well, I'm off to Seattle again. I'm getting tired of road trips.
RE: [Leaf-devel] SF Mirror
If folks think getting a name would be a good idea, I'm willing to pay for it. -sp -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mike Sensney Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 9:07 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Leaf-devel] SF Mirror Ibiblio might be a good mirror for LEAF. They just added another terabyte of storage online, they have a lot of bandwidth, they are Linux friendly, and they are willing to host .org web sites. http://www.ibiblio.org/about.html BTW, both leaf-project.org and leaf-central.org are currently available. Wouldn't it be neat if LEAF's home page was something like http://www.leaf-central.org? Well, I'm off to Seattle again. I'm getting tired of road trips. ___ Leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
Re: [Leaf-devel] ADM Write Protect
Mike, I don't own an Apacer ADM. I want to buy a Flash-Disk with write protection. At the moment I'm checking out a M-sys DOC-module on an M-Sys PCI evaluation board. I'll send you information about it ASAP. Manfred Mike Noyes schrieb: > > Manfred, > I have a meeting this week with SST distributor Symmetry Electronics. They > are providing me with a 8MB unit, so my father can try to create a > jumper/switch that enables/disables WP. > > The people at SST have indicated that WP is possible. It looks like the > Apacer representative below is saying the same thing. A hardware change is > needed. Specifically, creation of a jumper that connects pin 62 of the > LD017 controller chip to ground is needed to use WP. > > Does your Apacer ADM have an LD017 controller chip on it? > > At 2002-02-18 07:52 +0100, Manfred Schuler wrote: > >I received today this statement from apacer: > > > >Betreff: > >Fw: ADM write protection > > Datum: > >Mon, 18 Feb 2002 13:49:00 +0800 > >Von: > >"Sarah Hsieh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > An: > >"Manfred Schuler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >Dear customer, > >I am very sorry for that not providing prompt response due to a long > >vacation (Chinese New Year) from 2/9 ~ 2/17. And the answer is Yes. Our > >ATA Diak Module have at this time no possibility for write protection. > >The write protection function need to change the hardware designing. > > > >If you have any problem, please contact us, we will be glad to help you. > >Best regards, > >Apacer Service Engineer > > -- > Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/ > http://leaf.sourceforge.net/content.php?menu=1000&page_id=4 -- Manfred Schuler Beerenweg 4 31275 Lehrte Tel.: (0 51 75) 66 54 Fax: (07 21) 1 51 22 22 17 E_Mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
Re: [Leaf-devel] Re: Standards and due process :-)
On 2/17/02 at 5:52 AM, Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 2002-02-16 21:31 -0600, David Douthitt wrote: > >I was thinking one would run this script in a LEAF > >environment - and it would be set up by a developer, who > >defines what is needed. Then you could boot Oxygen (or > >PacketFilter, or...) and run this script which tests the > >environment. > > David, > Exactly. Then I thought we could take this output, and use > it to check new packages for release/branch > compatibility. The output could be placed in a text file, > and parsed by another script that is designed to test > packages. This new script wouldn't run from a LEAF > environment. Instead, it would use a development > environment. > > A release/branch lead developer runs the environment test > script on his/her release/branch. He then places the > output files on our site. A package developer downloads > the environment test script output files to a machine with > the package test script. The package developer then tests > his/her new package. Well, that's not quite what I had in mind. For me, I was thinking more along the lines of: A distribution developer perhaps runs a script, writes some shell code, etc. - and creates a "package" (or shell script, really) which tests for various things. The script (or scripts) would work within the LEAF environment... Then a package creator (or software developer) would run a compilation of these scripts (which would have some overlap... and which overlap would be removed...) and it would tell him if his code was compatible with the environment or not. These scripts would be available to run in the LEAF environment, or any environment... > $ lrp_pkg_tst.pl foo.lrp > Testing foo.lrp ... > file structure: OK > program name: foo > program version: 1.00 > libc version: 2.1.3 > Checking compatibility with Oxygen... >Parsing 1.9 output: yes >Parsing 1.8 output: yes >Parsing Dec.2000 output: no > Checking compatibility with Dachstein... >Parsing 1.0.2 1680: no >Parsing 1.0.2 CD: no I was thinking more like: # lrp_pkg_tst.sh requirements.txt Testing for test -z option... yes Testing for test -n option... yes Testing for NFS mount... no Testing for root.lrp... no Testing for 1.68M disk... no Testing for vfat support... no Testing for iso9660 support... no Testing for ide support... no [...etc...] Summary: Oxygen support: Ok Dachstein support: Ok Bering support: No # -- David Douthitt UNIX Systems Administrator HP-UX, Unixware, Linux [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
