Re: [Leaf-devel] Affiliates

2002-07-08 Thread Mike Noyes

On Mon, 2002-07-08 at 06:55, Mike Noyes wrote:
 rc.firewall
 This site is unavailable, and there hasn't been a new release in a
 while. Does anyone know what the rcf development status is?

Everyone,
Steven just informed me this site is up and running again. I'm reviewing
the rcf-devel list archive for development status.

-- 
Mike Noyes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/
http://leaf-project.org/



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Oh, it's good to be a geek.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

___
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel



Re: [Leaf-devel] Affiliates

2002-07-08 Thread guitarlynn

On Monday 08 July 2002 08:55, Mike Noyes wrote:

 Mosquito
 From what I was able to glean from babelfish, it looks like
 Mosquito was purchased by a VPN company (SeSame), renamed to IPnuts,
 and was taken commercial. Does anyone have information on Mosquito
 development status?
 http://babelfish.altavista.com/urltrurl?lp=ja_enurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww
.s-me.co.jp%2Fnews%2F020516.html

It appears that they now a cd-release for sale and have/working-on a
2.4.x kernel with VPN, SSL, and *SQL capabilities. I'd like to know what
is going on since they are now commercially owned and we haven't heard
from anyone since the buyout.


 Corporate Affiliates proposal:
 I'd like us to start affiliating with corporations. However, I'm
 unsure of the point where we should consider a company for
 affiliation. Do they need to provide code resources and a link
 back to us for consideration, or just a link back to us? Examples: *
 Echogent: fwlog.pl cgi-script, Echowall, ftp white paper, Scott Best
 is a project member.
 * SeSame: Mosquito image, various packages, Webadmin, and
 reciprocal link.
 * Bits Over Atoms: Reciprocal link to us.

If they're gleaning LEAF GPL'ed code and charging for it, it would seem
fair (fill in the blank).  :-(

Paying for Consulting and site setup is fine with me (I do a little of
this), but sale of the software (and in particular closing of code) is
quite another, IMHO.

 Consultant List proposal:
 I'd like us to create a web page with links or contact
 information of consultants willing to contract for LEAF
 installations. Should we use the linuxports.com site for listings, or
 something else?

This sounds good to me. I really don't know how consultants could be
qualified by the project though. It could be rather easy to get over
your head in a short-term project.

 These proposals may not be good ideas, but I thought they should be
 discussed.
Discussion is a good idea!  :-)
-- 

~Lynn Avants
aka Guitarlynn

guitarlynn at users.sourceforge.net
http://leaf.sourceforge.net

If linux isn't the answer, you've probably got the wrong question!


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Oh, it's good to be a geek.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

___
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel



RE: [Leaf-devel] Weblet Demo Site

2002-07-08 Thread Richard Amerman

Mike,
 
I just wanted to let you know I have not forgotten this request.  I plan on cleaning 
things up to pass this validator in the near future.
 
Richard Amerman

-Original Message- 
From: Mike Noyes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thu 6/27/2002 3:30 PM 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Cc: 
Subject: Re: [Leaf-devel] Weblet Demo Site



On Thu, 2002-06-27 at 14:29, Richard Amerman wrote:
 I have just finished setting up a Weblet Demo box.
 It is located at
 207.202.227.167

 Pleas check it out and post comments!!

Richard,
It looks very nice. :-)
I have one request/question. Are you able to get this Weblet Demo to
generate valid xhtml code?

http://validator.w3.org/

--
Mike Noyes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/
http://leaf-project.org/



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Bringing you mounds of caffeinated joy.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

___
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel


N¬±ù޵隊X¬²š'²ŠÞu¼“†)äç¤:­²
(vÚy¨zHm¶Ÿÿ¶§’ž‘ÊþÇËy§Ýz÷¥™¨¥Šx%ŠËKy§Ýz÷¥–+-²Ê.­ÇŸ¢¸ëa¶Úlÿùb²Û,¢êÜyú+éÞ·ùb²Û?–+-ŠwèþWš}ׯz


RE: [Leaf-devel] Affiliates

2002-07-08 Thread kitakura

 On Monday 08 July 2002 08:55, Mike Noyes wrote:

  Mosquito
  From what I was able to glean from babelfish, it looks like
  Mosquito was purchased by a VPN company (SeSame), renamed to IPnuts,
  and was taken commercial. Does anyone have information on Mosquito
  development status?
  http://babelfish.altavista.com/urltrurl?lp=ja_enurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww
 .s-me.co.jp%2Fnews%2F020516.html

 It appears that they now a cd-release for sale and have/working-on a
 2.4.x kernel with VPN, SSL, and *SQL capabilities. I'd like to know what
 is going on since they are now commercially owned and we haven't heard
 from anyone since the buyout.

Mosquito   changed the name to IPnuts 3.4.

2.2.20 kernel
VPN SSL support. not SQL.
but VPN was not ditributed online.


  Corporate Affiliates proposal:
  I'd like us to start affiliating with corporations. However, I'm
  unsure of the point where we should consider a company for
  affiliation. Do they need to provide code resources and a link
  back to us for consideration, or just a link back to us? Examples: *
  Echogent: fwlog.pl cgi-script, Echowall, ftp white paper, Scott Best
  is a project member.
  * SeSame: Mosquito image, various packages, Webadmin, and
  reciprocal link.
  * Bits Over Atoms: Reciprocal link to us.

 If they're gleaning LEAF GPL'ed code and charging for it, it would seem
 fair (fill in the blank).  :-(

Packages in http://www.s-me.co.jp/mosquito/mos3_4/packages/  are
GPL lisence.(and Other open source license decided by Auther.)

WebAdmin is GPL. ( only japanese. a part is english)
but,  since we assert license, the user interface code of WebAdmin
 for [, such as VPN, ] a specific package is unacquirable in online.
WebAdmin has the menu form which can be added.
# And If not related to me, WebAdmin is used also for
# firewall distribution of Japan in time.

config.lrp is also my code. it is GPL.This can gather configuration file
written .conf. I think that it is useful.

Webadmin.lrp,config.lrp,rc.lrp ,etc.lrp and root.lrp can not use other leaf
distribution ,since they are  imcompatible.
But other packages may be compatible with little modify,I think.
A part of them includes code for Webadmin and rc.( but they are gpl.)

But when webadmin is upgraded, a license may change.

# I'm developing kernel 2.4. It is going to use the linuxrc code of Bering.
# I am thankful to many developers.


 Paying for Consulting and site setup is fine with me (I do a little of
 this), but sale of the software (and in particular closing of code) is
 quite another, IMHO.

  Consultant List proposal:
  I'd like us to create a web page with links or contact
  information of consultants willing to contract for LEAF
  installations. Should we use the linuxports.com site for listings, or
  something else?

 This sounds good to me. I really don't know how consultants could be
 qualified by the project though. It could be rather easy to get over
 your head in a short-term project.



  These proposals may not be good ideas, but I thought they should be
  discussed.
 Discussion is a good idea!  :-)
 --

 ~Lynn Avants
 aka Guitarlynn

 guitarlynn at users.sourceforge.net
 http://leaf.sourceforge.net

 If linux isn't the answer, you've probably got the wrong question!


 ---
 This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
 Oh, it's good to be a geek.
 http://thinkgeek.com/sf

 ___
 Leaf-devel mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel




---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Oh, it's good to be a geek.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

___
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel


RE: [Leaf-devel] Affiliates

2002-07-08 Thread Mike Noyes

On Mon, 2002-07-08 at 17:26, kitakura wrote:
  On Monday 08 July 2002 08:55, Mike Noyes wrote:
   Mosquito
   From what I was able to glean from babelfish

Kitakura,
It is nice to hear from you again. :-)
 
 Mosquito   changed the name to IPnuts 3.4.

Then it was just a name change not a buyout by another company.

 But when webadmin is upgraded, a license may change.

I'm sorry to hear this, but those that write the code usually get to
choose the license.

 # I'm developing kernel 2.4. It is going to use the linuxrc code of Bering.

Great. Is there an announcement list I can use to keep up to date with
the developments of IPnuts? Also, should I change the name on our
affiliates page to IPnuts? If so, will you have a new topic icon for
IPnuts available in the near future?

 # I am thankful to many developers.

Thank you for taking the time to update us on IPnuts (a.k.a. Mosquito).

-- 
Mike Noyes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/
http://leaf-project.org/



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Oh, it's good to be a geek.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

___
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel