[leaf-devel] Buc 5.x Beta ?
Hi all, i think buc 5 is enough stable so a beta can be released ? What do you think about releasing a 5.0-beta1 ? Regards, Yves -- Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct ___ leaf-devel mailing list leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
Re: [leaf-devel] Buc 5.x Beta ?
Hi. Before we decided to announce 5.0-alpha (because there is active development process, and before release we may decide to upgrade kernel/uClibc/toolchain, + we still not have working cross-compiled image for non-x86 arch - for ex., some SOHO MIPS router). 24.10.2012 11:12, Yves Blusseau пишет: > Hi all, > > i think buc 5 is enough stable so a beta can be released ? > What do you think about releasing a 5.0-beta1 ? > > Regards, > Yves > > -- > Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. > Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics > Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: > http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct > > ___ > leaf-devel mailing list > leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel -- Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct ___ leaf-devel mailing list leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
Re: [leaf-devel] Buc 5.x Beta ?
Am 24.10.2012 10:59, schrieb Andrew:
> Hi.
> Before we decided to announce 5.0-alpha (because there is active
> development process, and before release we may decide to upgrade
> kernel/uClibc/toolchain, + we still not have working cross-compiled
> image for non-x86 arch - for ex., some SOHO MIPS router).
>
> 24.10.2012 11:12, Yves Blusseau пишет:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> i think buc 5 is enough stable so a beta can be released ?
>> What do you think about releasing a 5.0-beta1 ?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Yves
Hi;
I don't mind if it's called alpha or beta, but I agree with Yves, that
at least the 32-bit X86 images are in a good shape (sometimes even a bit
better than 4.x) and worth a release.
We also almost reached our major goals for 5.x, a toolchain that is
capable to generate kernel and packages for other architectures
("arm-versatile"), although we have no image ready yet. But this is IMHO
no showstopper - it can be added anytime during alpha/beta cycle.
I assume that working on a bootable ARM/MIPS image may require to patch
the kernel, or adding a replacement for syslinux - so we may call it
alpha...
BTW: What's the status of the 64bit branch? Are there plans to merge it?
kp
--
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct
___
leaf-devel mailing list
leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
Re: [leaf-devel] Buc 5.x Beta ?
Le 24/10/2012 15:22, KP Kirchdoerfer a écrit :
> Am 24.10.2012 10:59, schrieb Andrew:
>> Hi.
>> Before we decided to announce 5.0-alpha (because there is active
>> development process, and before release we may decide to upgrade
>> kernel/uClibc/toolchain, + we still not have working cross-compiled
>> image for non-x86 arch - for ex., some SOHO MIPS router).
>>
>> 24.10.2012 11:12, Yves Blusseau пишет:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> i think buc 5 is enough stable so a beta can be released ?
>>> What do you think about releasing a 5.0-beta1 ?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Yves
> Hi;
>
> I don't mind if it's called alpha or beta, but I agree with Yves, that
> at least the 32-bit X86 images are in a good shape (sometimes even a bit
> better than 4.x) and worth a release.
>
> We also almost reached our major goals for 5.x, a toolchain that is
> capable to generate kernel and packages for other architectures
> ("arm-versatile"), although we have no image ready yet. But this is IMHO
> no showstopper - it can be added anytime during alpha/beta cycle.
>
> I assume that working on a bootable ARM/MIPS image may require to patch
> the kernel, or adding a replacement for syslinux - so we may call it
> alpha...
>
> BTW: What's the status of the 64bit branch? Are there plans to merge it?
Hi KP,
all compile fine except oprofile package.
You can use the buc5-x86_64-toolchain branch and the
x86_64-unknown-linux-uclibc toolchain to test.
Regards,
Yves
--
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct
___
leaf-devel mailing list
leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
Re: [leaf-devel] Buc 5.x Beta ?
Am 24.10.2012 16:25, schrieb Yves Blusseau:
> Le 24/10/2012 15:22, KP Kirchdoerfer a écrit :
>> Am 24.10.2012 10:59, schrieb Andrew:
>>> Hi.
>>> Before we decided to announce 5.0-alpha (because there is active
>>> development process, and before release we may decide to upgrade
>>> kernel/uClibc/toolchain, + we still not have working cross-compiled
>>> image for non-x86 arch - for ex., some SOHO MIPS router).
>>>
>>> 24.10.2012 11:12, Yves Blusseau пишет:
Hi all,
i think buc 5 is enough stable so a beta can be released ?
What do you think about releasing a 5.0-beta1 ?
Regards,
Yves
>> Hi;
>>
>> I don't mind if it's called alpha or beta, but I agree with Yves, that
>> at least the 32-bit X86 images are in a good shape (sometimes even a bit
>> better than 4.x) and worth a release.
>>
>> We also almost reached our major goals for 5.x, a toolchain that is
>> capable to generate kernel and packages for other architectures
>> ("arm-versatile"), although we have no image ready yet. But this is IMHO
>> no showstopper - it can be added anytime during alpha/beta cycle.
>>
>> I assume that working on a bootable ARM/MIPS image may require to patch
>> the kernel, or adding a replacement for syslinux - so we may call it
>> alpha...
>>
>> BTW: What's the status of the 64bit branch? Are there plans to merge it?
> Hi KP,
> all compile fine except oprofile package.
> You can use the buc5-x86_64-toolchain branch and the
> x86_64-unknown-linux-uclibc toolchain to test.
Hi Yves;
Fine, oprofile is always a pb...
But what are the plans, shall it be merged into maint as third
toolchain, and if so, it might be good idea to do before an alpha release...
kp
--
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct
___
leaf-devel mailing list
leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
[leaf-devel] leaf hubs
Hi Mike; looks like the "hubs" of the php application doesn't work. http://leaf.sourceforge.net/ - works http://leaf.sourceforge.net/bering-uclibc/ -fails to load without error message. kp -- Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct ___ leaf-devel mailing list leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
Re: [leaf-devel] leaf hubs
On 10/24/2012 09:21 AM, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: > Hi Mike; > > looks like the "hubs" of the php application doesn't work. > > http://leaf.sourceforge.net/ - works > > http://leaf.sourceforge.net/bering-uclibc/ -fails to load without error > message. KP, Thanks for letting me know. I'll look into the issue. SF updated the web farm environment and OS. Ticket 1183 opened. https://sourceforge.net/p/forge/site-support/1183/ -- Mike Noyes http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes https://plus.google.com/u/0/113364780158082152468 -- Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct ___ leaf-devel mailing list leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
Re: [leaf-devel] leaf hubs
Am 24.10.2012 18:49, schrieb Mike Noyes: > On 10/24/2012 09:21 AM, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: >> Hi Mike; >> >> looks like the "hubs" of the php application doesn't work. >> >> http://leaf.sourceforge.net/ - works >> >> http://leaf.sourceforge.net/bering-uclibc/ -fails to load without error >> message. > > KP, > Thanks for letting me know. I'll look into the issue. > > SF updated the web farm environment and OS. Ticket 1183 opened. > > https://sourceforge.net/p/forge/site-support/1183/ > Thx Mike; btw: what about the plans upgrading to SF2? While I have no exact release schedule right now, it will be good to know. kp -- Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct ___ leaf-devel mailing list leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
Re: [leaf-devel] Buc 5.x Beta ?
24.10.2012 17:25, Yves Blusseau пишет:
> Le 24/10/2012 15:22, KP Kirchdoerfer a écrit :
>> Am 24.10.2012 10:59, schrieb Andrew:
>>> Hi.
>>> Before we decided to announce 5.0-alpha (because there is active
>>> development process, and before release we may decide to upgrade
>>> kernel/uClibc/toolchain, + we still not have working cross-compiled
>>> image for non-x86 arch - for ex., some SOHO MIPS router).
>>>
>>> 24.10.2012 11:12, Yves Blusseau пишет:
Hi all,
i think buc 5 is enough stable so a beta can be released ?
What do you think about releasing a 5.0-beta1 ?
Regards,
Yves
>> Hi;
>>
>> I don't mind if it's called alpha or beta, but I agree with Yves, that
>> at least the 32-bit X86 images are in a good shape (sometimes even a bit
>> better than 4.x) and worth a release.
>>
>> We also almost reached our major goals for 5.x, a toolchain that is
>> capable to generate kernel and packages for other architectures
>> ("arm-versatile"), although we have no image ready yet. But this is IMHO
>> no showstopper - it can be added anytime during alpha/beta cycle.
>>
>> I assume that working on a bootable ARM/MIPS image may require to patch
>> the kernel, or adding a replacement for syslinux - so we may call it
>> alpha...
>>
>> BTW: What's the status of the 64bit branch? Are there plans to merge it?
> Hi KP,
> all compile fine except oprofile package.
> You can use the buc5-x86_64-toolchain branch and the
> x86_64-unknown-linux-uclibc toolchain to test.
>
> Regards,
> Yves
>
oprofile just requires libbfd assembled with -fPIC - I committed
changes, it seems like now it's assembled correctly.
P.S. For some reasons gcc stack protector was disabled (maybe something
fails to compile with it); I'll try to enable it.
--
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct
___
leaf-devel mailing list
leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
