Re: [Leaf-devel] trying to install UML

2002-09-04 Thread Erich Titl

Salut Jacques

Jacques Nilo wrote the following at 14:41 04.09.2002:
>On Tuesday 03 September 2002 21:27, Erich Titl wrote:
> > Hi all
> >
> > I am trying to build a UML environment according to Jacques/Eric's info.
> >
> > applying the uml patch works fine, but the bering patches are not all
> > appliccable.
> >
> > Should I step back to 2.4.18 or just ignore the Patch diagnostics for the
> > rejected hunks.
> >
> From the above I understand that you are trying do use a 2.4.19 kernel?

This is so, following the instructions which specify the latest kernel from 
the source.


>If so I confirm that 2.4.18 Bering patches won't apply cleanly and need some
>tweaking. The only serious pb is with the newnat13-and-helpers patch which
>just cannot be applied. You need the update from
>http://www.roeder.goe.net/~koepi/newnat.html
>But this is untested. You will also need to move to iptables-1.2.7a :-)

No trouble, for what I have in mind (dhclient) a 2.4.18 will be ok.


>Moving to 2.4.19 is not in the priority list.
>Bering V1.0-rc4 and/or final will be 2.4.18 based.

So I am in good company


>But if you are using UML my guess is that you probably do not need any of
>Bering patches which are optionnals unless you are trying to do something
>very specific.
>Also note that you should not apply grsecurity patch on a UML kernel

I noted that from the web page although the instructions before say so.


>Alt this stage I guess I need more info about what you are trying to achieve.
>
>2.4.18 Bering patched UML kernel are available on the LEAF download area

Jacques, I just have 2.2 kernel on my desktop but would like to compile 
dhclient and/or possibly network drivers for my bering laptop which is 
unable to get a dhcp lease due to the 4 byte bug. If by chance you have 
read leaf-user there is a little unresolved thread.

Thanks

Erich

THINK
Püntenstrasse 39
8143 Stallikon
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Fingerprint: BC9A 25BC 3954 3BC8 C024  8D8A B7D4 FF9D 05B8 0A16



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone?  Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390

___
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel



Re: [Leaf-devel] trying to install UML

2002-09-04 Thread Jacques Nilo

On Tuesday 03 September 2002 21:27, Erich Titl wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I am trying to build a UML environment according to Jacques/Eric's info.
>
> applying the uml patch works fine, but the bering patches are not all
> appliccable.
>
> Should I step back to 2.4.18 or just ignore the Patch diagnostics for the
> rejected hunks.
>
>From the above I understand that you are trying do use a 2.4.19 kernel?

If so I confirm that 2.4.18 Bering patches won't apply cleanly and need some 
tweaking. The only serious pb is with the newnat13-and-helpers patch which 
just cannot be applied. You need the update from
http://www.roeder.goe.net/~koepi/newnat.html
But this is untested. You will also need to move to iptables-1.2.7a :-)

Moving to 2.4.19 is not in the priority list. 
Bering V1.0-rc4 and/or final will be 2.4.18 based. 

But if you are using UML my guess is that you probably do not need any of 
Bering patches which are optionnals unless you are trying to do something 
very specific.
Also note that you should not apply grsecurity patch on a UML kernel

Alt this stage I guess I need more info about what you are trying to achieve.

2.4.18 Bering patched UML kernel are available on the LEAF download area

Jacques


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone?  Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390

___
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel



[Leaf-devel] trying to install UML

2002-09-03 Thread Erich Titl

Hi all

I am trying to build a UML environment according to Jacques/Eric's info.

applying the uml patch works fine, but the bering patches are not all 
appliccable.

Should I step back to 2.4.18 or just ignore the Patch diagnostics for the 
rejected hunks.

Thanks

Erich

THINK
Püntenstrasse 39
8143 Stallikon
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Fingerprint: BC9A 25BC 3954 3BC8 C024  8D8A B7D4 FF9D 05B8 0A16



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone?  Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390

___
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel